Skip to main content

Accelerate sustainability in process manufacturing

Get to net-zero faster with smart manufacturing

Despite a reputation as “hard to abate,” process manufacturing companies are actively crafting sustainability strategies to reach their net-zero decarbonization goals. Discover how smart manufacturing technology is helping them accelerate the path toward sustainability through better emissions reduction, energy efficiency, and waste minimization.

How process manufacturing industries can accelerate sustainability transformation

For companies in the energy, downstream refining, chemicals, and materials industries, decarbonization and emissions reduction are critical for the path to net-zero. Due to their position in the value chain, reductions in their scope 1 (direct energy and process emissions) and scope 2 (indirect purchased energy and steam) emissions have impacts on the scope 3 emissions of various other industries, such as consumer goods, transportation, and construction, to name a few.1 Many important reduction levers involve technologies and supply chains that are still evolving (e.g., carbon capture and storage, clean hydrogen).2 There are, however, critical steps companies can take now to reduce their scope 1 and 2 emissions from existing assets and brownfield operations that will set them up for greater success when they can implement the larger transition levers that will achieve critical reductions.

 

3 key areas where smart manufacturing accelerates decarbonization and sustainability

In the full report, we explore three key areas in which smart manufacturing capabilities accelerate the decarbonization and sustainability transformation of energy and chemical companies. These capabilities and technology solutions address many sources of carbon—emissions, energy, and waste (figure 1).

Please click on the below sections to expand and explore the details of how smart manufacturing can accelerate decarbonization and sustainability in these key areas.

Emissions monitoring and management can be applied to various emissions sources. Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions can come from the fuel that is burned to heat the process, the process itself (e.g., CO2 exiting a wet gas scrubber or leaking equipment), or from the feedstocks used. Organizations must first determine which of these emissions sources will be addressed by the relevant technologies and then select the suitable available solution that can integrate with existing infrastructure. There are multiple technology providers using Internet of Things (IoT), drones, first principles, and digital twins, among other capabilities, to measure emissions and provide comprehensive emissions monitoring and management.

One prevalent capability combines leak detection via sensors with artificial intelligence (AI) and analytics to enable quick detection, isolation, and mitigation of the leak. This technology is applicable to a wide array of use cases, including fenceline and tank farms monitoring for Leak Detection and Repair (LDAR), providing early warning of leaks using gas sensors, wireless and IoT capabilities, and AI/machine learning (ML)-based analytics. Previously, leaks could go undetected for a long time, until a routine manual inspection was scheduled. As stated in one account of a refinery implementation, identifying the leaks and their sources and responding quickly to mitigate them could potentially reduce emissions by as much as 70 metric tons per year for a typical refinery or chemical facility.3 These solutions also support streamlined reporting for regulatory compliance.

Another capability is end-to-end emissions monitoring, control, and optimization. These solutions go beyond reactive leak detection and monitoring to allow for process visualization and optimization of emissions, including feedstock, energy source choices, and operational efficiency. A leading global cement manufacturer utilized plant data management and analytics capabilities to monitor, optimize, and control emissions and energy usage to reduce nearly 140,000 tons of CO2 in a year.4 Some emissions management platforms even allow facilities to accurately report carbon emissions with a mass-balance carbon accounting approach as well as accurately predict emissions and carbon intensity.

Currently, process operations implement and adhere to safety and operability limit envelopes, alarms, and alerts for critical process variables. With the addition of smart emissions monitoring and reporting technologies, these operability constraints can be further enhanced to incorporate sustainability limits for emissions and energy usage in manufacturing operations. Based on these limits, alerts and alarms can be generated to identify emissions and leaks carrying environmental consequences with associated recommended mitigation actions to reduce the scope 1 emissions from operations.

Proactive emissions reduction

Beyond emissions monitoring using Industrial IoT (IIoT) sensors, drones, and reactive responses to incidents, organizations can utilize existing advanced process control and optimization solutions to proactively reduce emissions by defining the environmental, social, and governance (ESG) “costs” of GHG emissions. This can be achieved by incorporating the costs and the constraint limits for emissions from manufacturing operations into the objective functions of the advanced process control and plant automation solutions so that the sustainability criteria are considered along with the economic optimization. Ideally, the plant would have emissions targets and limits, as well as a plan for advanced control solutions to be implemented during manufacturing execution along with the production targets so that the operating conditions are within those limits.

In addition, by mining historical plant data and process operations knowledge, AI/ML models can identify the operating conditions and patterns correlated with emissions and incident data from the past. Using insights learned from the data, plants can develop intelligent advisory models to determine and recommend the optimal operations parameter setpoints to run the process units with reduced emissions. Once trained and tested, such AI-based emissions reduction models can be integrated with existing process control solutions to enable autonomous operations.

For hard-to-abate chemicals and materials industries that burn fuels to achieve high-temperature operations, energy requirements are intrinsically linked to emissions. Multiple technologies and applications have arisen from the need to find energy efficiencies to achieve net-zero emissions from manufacturing operations and achieve decarbonization targets.

Utilities optimization with opportunity identification is one such technology focused on optimizing plant processes, allowing operators to manage and optimize balancing energy across the production site. This capability is currently being used by a leading multinational chemical manufacturing company and has enabled it to reduce carbon emissions by 60,000 tons per year, as well as to minimize steam losses and reduce GHG emissions.5

Another capability is more suited toward management of the energy system rather than optimization of plant processes. Energy management and information systems (EMIS) monitor, schedule, and optimize in real time to provide insight into emissions, cost-effective energy production, distribution, scheduling, and trading. This type of technology has been implemented by the largest Latin American petrochemical company.6 By incorporating EMIS into its processing unit operations, it was able to automatically select the most appropriate energy source for its equipment, thus increasing efficiencies and stability.

Depending on regional availability of support, it may be beneficial to implement different fit-for-purpose vendor EMIS at various global facilities. A metals manufacturer was experiencing rapid growth and needed to implement a solution to contend with stricter emissions regulations, increased gas costs, and improved energy intensity. To meet these goals, the manufacturer looked to implement a solution to dynamically reoptimize inputs based on real-time data and optimize energy usage through a control system. Further, the manufacturer wanted to increase the transparency of the operations by increasing visibility into energy usage at each step.

Working with the manufacturer, Deloitte identified opportunities to improve sustainability, efficiency, and energy usage through a combination of process improvements and software solutions. Within these opportunities, Deloitte provided multiple options for EMIS that would allow the company to choose from selected EMIS that fit each site’s needs. The Deloitte team also provided physical process improvements to reduce downtime and energy losses that coincided with EMIS to achieve sustainability and energy savings goals. The implementation was rolled out utilizing multiple EMIS, driving 10% reduction in energy intensity for each plant. This, in turn, reduced emissions by lowering the amount of energy input needed throughout each step.

Energy and utilities optimization

Beyond energy monitoring and reactive management, two factors largely enable proactive energy optimization to transform energy efficiency: the amount of energy and utilities data a plant can collect and the degree to which it can leverage predictive insights from that data for optimal operations recommendations. While data collection can be highly reliant on hardware and networks, optimization depends on software utilizing AI, machine learning, and advanced analytics platforms to achieve improved efficiencies. Typical key steps in this journey are to define the energy management strategy and road map for operations, develop improved processes and operating procedures to minimize energy usage and loss, and build a business case for advanced energy and utilities optimization solutions for dynamic energy supply/demand balancing.

Smart manufacturing capabilities present a significant opportunity to improve industry energy efficiency. By analyzing historical energy and utilities usage data against associated process data and events, AI models can learn operations patterns and provide insights. These models can determine the optimal operating conditions and process parameter settings to balance energy demand and supply, and to minimize energy usage and losses, leading to cost savings and reduced emissions. The optimization and balancing of planned energy consumption with energy supply from diverse sources, including renewables, can be performed while minimizing energy losses. End-to-end energy optimization starts with energy demand and supply planning. It then entails real-time monitoring and control to balance utilities and energy sources and sinks. Organizations can integrate these advanced energy optimization capabilities with existing EMIS.

As the manufacturing sector advances, the focus on sustainability is diversifying. While monitoring emissions and optimizing energy use remain central, there’s a growing emphasis on proactive quality management and waste reduction. This comprehensive approach to sustainability extends beyond just traditional quality management and overall asset efficiency, encompassing every aspect of the manufacturing process, from design and sourcing to delivery and service. The transition toward a more environmentally conscious future is closely linked with these diverse efforts, ensuring that each stage in the production process is eco-friendly.

The data on waste generation in the United States underscores the importance of quality control and waste minimization in manufacturing processes. In 2018, the United States generated approximately 292.4 million short tons of municipal solid waste.7 Concurrently, research from MIT indicates that the generation rates of non-hazardous industrial waste (NHIW) were on the same order of magnitude, with estimates ranging from 246 million to 316 million US tons annually.8 The Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) Program, which tracks specific chemicals for their potential health and environmental implications, reported that, in 2021, the United States managed 29.3 billion pounds of production-related, TRI-listed chemical waste.9 Of this, approximately 3.22 billion pounds were disposed of or released into the environment. These figures highlight the imperative for industries to adopt rigorous quality compliance and waste minimization approaches.

In the dynamic world of plant operations, Deloitte’s Smart Manufacturing capabilities are pioneering the integration of predictive quality and smart statistical process control (SPC) to optimize production. Deloitte’s approach to smart SPC standardizes data, visualizes performance trends, and dynamically adjusts control limits. In an implementation for a manufacturing company, Deloitte’s Predictor & Solver solution used advanced analytics to optimize machine settings to enhance material flow and reduce waste. This intervention led to an impressive annual EBITDA improvement of $1.3 million, with primary value drivers being reduced waste, increased profitability, and heightened operational efficiency.

Predictive quality and process control to prevent quality deviations

A key challenge for the process industry is that performing quality test analyses of collected samples and receiving results takes a significant amount of time, during which deviations from product quality and wastage can occur. Predictive quality capability enables sustainable and safe production practices by proactively controlling production quality within specifications and minimizing waste. By leveraging AI/ML models, predictive quality can recommend adjustments of process variable parameters and equipment settings based on process data inputs. These predictive quality models can be developed using historical process and events data aligned with quality test results data from laboratory information management systems (LIMS). The models can be trained to predict key quality characteristics properties in real time based on process data and to provide the process control setpoint changes needed to keep the product quality within specifications.

For a plastics products manufacturer, Deloitte developed a model predicting process anomalies well in advance, with troubleshooting and interventions leading to a potential value of $10 million across the plant network and an additional 40,000 pounds of production annually per line. The primary benefits were a significant reduction in waste and downtime and a streamlined root-cause analysis and quality review process. The above-described innovative capabilities in Deloitte’s Smart Manufacturing offerings signify a transformative shift in quality and waste management. They emphasize not just the integration of smart technologies but a holistic approach to quality, efficiency, and sustainability, providing manufacturers a competitive edge in today’s market.

How to get started on smart manufacturing-enabled decarbonization and sustainability

Similar to the safety and health transformation journeys of the previous decades, the transition to sustainable manufacturing is both an imperative and a challenge. Industries today face several complexities, from technological shifts to evolving regulatory landscapes. Traditional processes, reliant on fossil fuels for high temperatures, pose significant hurdles in the shift to sustainable alternatives. 

Yet, amid these challenges lies the opportunity to redefine manufacturing for a greener future. Recognizing these intricacies is the first step in crafting effective solutions.

The future of sustainable manufacturing starts with the seamless utilization and integration of advanced technologies to achieve both sustainability and efficiency. Global decarbonization challenges need to be addressed from the perspectives of people, process, and technology. The role of organizational culture and change management in embracing these sustainability priorities and enabling new technologies cannot be understated. To achieve the ambitious decarbonization targets set for the coming years, sustainability should be truly embedded into operations and business culture, driving behaviors from key performance indicators to incentives.

It is imperative that the industry transform to a “sustainability culture,” in which employees are empowered to advocate and ensure sustainable operations as a priority, enabling the success of the decarbonization journey toward net-zero. 

Companies also need to consider their unique operational challenges in achieving their sustainability goals. Beyond developing an overall corporate sustainability and decarbonization strategy, they should develop a multiyear plan and road map to achieve those targets along with the operating model and organizational change management to enable the transformation. Defining and prioritizing the initiatives for transforming existing brownfield plants and operations utilizing smart manufacturing technologies such as AI/ML, IIoT, and advanced analytics should be a key part of these efforts.

In addition, the capabilities of the workforce of the future—including skills, talent, and training—should be defined for the roles, responsibilities, and requirements of key stakeholders. Then companies should develop business processes for how these personas interact and collaborate to resolve adverse events in a closed-loop fashion, utilizing these advanced technologies and solutions to their fullest potential.

Choosing fit-for-purpose technologies to achieve your goals

The synergy of technology, decarbonization, and sustainability is reshaping manufacturing. As industries embrace these state-of-the-art technologies, they not only reinforce their commitment to sustainability but also carve out a distinct market niche. Emissions reduction, energy efficiency, predictive quality, and waste reduction technologies are all beneficial goals for any company, but how do they contribute toward overall decarbonization goals? Subsequently, how can these technologies be layered into an existing operational excellence program? The technologies reviewed here have differing emissions reduction potentials, as well as differing software, hardware, and organizational needs. For instance, in emissions reduction, leak detection tackles a very discrete set of emissions, requires sensors, and needs software that is likely net new to the operational excellence program. On the other hand, EMIS reduces a different source of emissions but also requires hardware and software. In the case of the emissions control and dynamic optimization, some of the sensors, monitoring, and process models may already be in place, but software capabilities bring a more advanced approach and integrations to end-to-end emissions management. The matrix in figure 2 depicts the relative decarbonization potential (compared to the current status quo) versus the effort for implementation of these technologies (based on the solution type) for consideration.

The future of sustainable manufacturing starts with the seamless utilization and integration of advanced technologies.

Learn more in the full report, Accelerate decarbonization and sustainability transformation with smart manufacturing.

Endnotes

1International Energy Agency (IEA), Net zero by 2050: A roadmap for the global energy sector, rev. 4, October 2021.

2Ibid.

3Sophia Guild, “Flint Hills Resources’ Dillon: Safety, stewardship remains a priority,” BIC Magazine, September/October 2023, p. 9.

4Berkan Fidan, “Digitalization & AI in cement manufacturing,” AVEVA, 2021.

5AspenTech, “SABIC continuously optimizes its utility system to reduce emissions and increase plant energy efficiencies,” 2021.

6IndústriaNews, “Braskem optimizes energy consumption and reduces CO2 emissions,” (English), April 29, 2023.

7US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), “National overview: Facts and figures on materials, wastes and recycling,” last updated November 22, 2023.

8Jonathan Seth Krones, “Accounting for non-hazardous industrial waste in the United States,” MIT Libraries, June 2016.

9EPA, “Introduction to the 2021 TRI national analysis,” last updated May 15, 2023.

Did you find this useful?

Thanks for your feedback