Skip to main content

A healthy approach to physician compensation

Attracting, compensating, and retaining health care providers

Aging populations. Labor shortages. Increasing US health care costs. Against the backdrop of these industry pressures, the value of physicians—and specifically primary care—has never been higher. Our report examines the evolving complexities of physician compensation and offers actionable physician retention strategies.

Understanding the drivers of change

What’s the current state of physician compensation?

We surveyed primary care physicians who currently work for managed care organizations to analyze physician compensation and evaluate industry benchmarks utilizing 2023 data. Based on the results, several important findings emerged:

  • Physicians’ annual compensation in value-based care (VBC) models varies from $190,000 to $500,000 or more.
  • The traditional talent model for primary care physicians is a cash-based salary of about $250,000 (median), which increases as work evolves to become more administrative in nature.
  • As of 2022, about 22% of physicians are employed by nonprovider corporate entities such as health plans, managed care organizations, private equity, or traditional technology companies.

Want more findings and provider equity compensation details? Download the full report.

Talent model considerations

While financial compensation is likely the most important component to attraction and retention, it’s not a ubiquitous solution to employment satisfaction. Employers should consider three other factors in physician talent models:

  1. A VBC talent model can reduce stress by allowing physicians to manage smaller patient panels. Some organizations in the marketplace today utilize panels of 400–500 patients, which is a roughly 75% reduction compared to average US panel size of 2,300—and is possible in a VBC structured organization.
  2. Physicians surveyed consistently indicated that the more time spent on tech-based administrative work, the greater their job dissatisfaction. Physicians are drawn to organizations with technology platforms that reduce administrative time and “screen time.”
  3. While there are a number of creative compensation options open to all organizations, Stark Law and other regulations such as the Friendly Professional Corporation (PC) practice of medicine need to be considered prior to implementing.

Physicians are becoming increasingly sophisticated financially and will look to the promise of growth in stock-based compensation. We believe organizations looking to attract and retain physician talent need to consider new, equity-based compensation models and talent strategies.

1. Create compensation structures that align with the continued transition to VBC.The longer a patient is cared for in a longitudinal model of care, the better the outcome. Undeniably, the tenure of the physician’s association allows them to diagnose better, build rapport to enable the patients to share sensitive information readily, and increase the physician’s ability to influence and direct care. Stock compensation that vests over time is a good retention measure that financially incentivizes the physician to stay in the role longer and organically extends the connection between patient and physician.

2. Incentivize holistic medicine and move beyond relative value units.Primary care physicians are asked to do more than patient consultation, and the job description is changing beyond traditional volume-based medicine to promote value-based outcomes. Physician compensation should reflect these essential activities, rather than conventional fee-for-service structures, and establish career paths that contemplate extending skills with compensated structures calibrated to reflect the new reality

3. Consider the impacts of M&A on physician compensation. Many care organizations have an exit strategy involving a transaction or an outright acquisition/buyout. Organizations should carefully consider how a transaction event can affect legacy compensation plans and consider creative temporary employment structures to make a transition more satisfactory, such as an employee lease agreement.

While our findings suggest that incorporating equity into provider compensation is critical to satisfaction and retention, providing equity is only sometimes an option—due to the corporate practice of medicine or similar regulatory considerations.

1. Devise creative compensation structures that can mirror stock-based compensation. Cash-based compensation plans that mirror or are tied to an organization’s stock performance are viable options. If not, it may make sense to compensate providers with cash premiums and/or increased deferred compensation plans.

2. Ensure compensation strategies are compliant with state regulations. Depending on the location of care, physicians may need to be employed in a separate entity from which they deliver care. Compensation plans should consider these structures (and/or related benefits, such as loans), particularly in states where friendly physician practice of medicine is required.

3. Be aware of options that can and cannot be provided as a for-profit vs. not-for-profit organization. The ability to incorporate equity options into an overall compensation package is a valuable lever that for-profit organizations can and should utilize for health care providers. That said, not-for-profit organizations have other options, ranging from deferred, tax-exempt programs to creating partnership models with physicians.

Did you find this useful?

Thanks for your feedback