Distinguishing liabilities from equity has implications for how a financial instrument is reflected in your income statement. So it’s important that the classification of liabilities is done in a thorough, thoughtful way. Let’s break down ASC 480 and the three key questions you need to consider when identifying liabilities versus equity.
Under US GAAP, securities issued as part of an entity’s capital structure are classified within one of the following three categories on an entity’s balance sheet:
*For SEC registrants and non-SEC registrants that choose to apply the SEC’s rules and guidance.
An instrument’s classification on the balance sheet will affect how returns on the instrument are reflected in an entity’s income statement. Returns on liability-classified instruments are reflected in net income (e.g., interest expense or mark-to-market adjustments), whereas returns on equity-classified instruments are generally reflected in equity, without affecting net income. However, dividends and remeasurement adjustments on equity securities that are classified as temporary equity may reduce an entity’s reported earnings per share (EPS).
In addition to the effect on net income and EPS, entities often seek to avoid classifying capital securities as liabilities or within temporary equity for other reasons, including:
ASC 480 is the starting point for determining whether an instrument must be classified as a liability. SEC registrants and non-SEC registrants that elect to apply the SEC’s guidance on redeemable equity securities must also consider the classification within equity (i.e., permanent vs. temporary equity). ASC 505 addresses the accounting for certain transactions involving financial instruments classified within equity (e.g., dividends and share repurchases) and also provides general guidance related to equity instruments. The relevant accounting guidance has existed for a number of years without substantial recent changes. In addition, we are not aware of any plans of the FASB or SEC to significantly change the guidance in the near future.
Securities issued in the legal form of debt must be classified as liabilities. In addition, ASC 480 requires liability classification for three types of freestanding financial instruments that are not debt in legal form:
In evaluating whether an instrument must be classified as a liability under ASC 480, entities must consider three key questions:
SEC registrants are required to apply the SEC’s guidance on redeemable equity securities. An entity that has filed a registration statement with the SEC is considered an SEC registrant. Other entities, such as companies that anticipate an IPO in the future, may elect to apply this guidance.
Equity-classified securities that contain any obligation outside the issuer’s control (whether conditional or unconditional) that may require the issuer to redeem the security must be classified as temporary equity. Equity securities that are classified as temporary equity are subject to the recognition, measurement, and EPS guidance in ASC 480-10-S99-3A, which is often complex to apply. The remeasurement guidance in ASC 480-10-S99-3A may negatively affect an entity’s reported EPS because adjustments to the redemption amount are often treated as dividends that reduce the numerator in EPS calculations.
An entity must apply the SEC’s guidance on the classification of redeemable equity securities in its SEC filings made in contemplation of an IPO or a merger with a SPAC.
In addition to issuing equity instruments, entities engage in other transactions involving financial instruments that are classified in equity, which include paying dividends, repurchasing shares, and modifying shares. ASC 505 addresses the accounting for certain distributions on equity shares as well as the accounting for treasury stock transactions. ASC 260 addresses the accounting implications for certain modifications and extinguishments of equity instruments. The accounting for other transactions involving financial instruments classified in equity is addressed by either practice that has developed over time or guidance provided by the SEC.
ASC 260 addresses the calculation, presentation, and disclosure of EPS. In addition, ASC 480-10-45-4 requires entities to make certain adjustments to the EPS calculation performed under ASC 260 for (1) mandatorily redeemable financial instruments and (2) forward contracts that require physical settlement by repurchase of a fixed number of equity shares of common stock in exchange for cash. For contracts that may be settled in stock or cash, whether at the option of the issuer or the holder, share settlement is presumed; therefore, the calculation of diluted EPS must include the potential shares under such contracts.
Deloitte’s Roadmap Distinguishing Liabilities From Equity provides a comprehensive discussion of the classification, recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure, and EPS guidance in ASC 480, ASC 505, and ASC 480-10-S99-3A. Entities should also consider Deloitte’s Roadmap Contracts on an Entity’s Own Equity for guidance on equity-linked instruments that are not outstanding shares as well as Deloitte’s Roadmap Earnings per Share for guidance on the calculation of basic and diluted EPS.