Skip to main content

Managing the complexities of intercompany tax operations

Challenges and opportunities for intercompany accounting

Intercompany tax is rising in complexity. As global tax rules evolve and digitalization accelerates across finance functions, managing tax within intercompany operations has become increasingly complex—and increasingly important. To help manage this new landscape, we explore some common intercompany tax challenges, leading practices, and how technology can enable intercompany tax transformation.

A blog post by Derek BradfieldRussel FincherSue Du and Katie Glynn

Intercompany tax is rising in complexity. As global tax rules evolve and digitalization accelerates across finance functions, managing tax within intercompany operations has become increasingly complex—and increasingly important. Today’s controllership teams are expected not only to ensure accurate accounting, but to anticipate tax implications, align with emerging global requirements, and collaborate seamlessly with tax functions.

To navigate this increasingly complex landscape effectively, organizations should understand the challenges inherent in intercompany tax, establish a strong process and governance framework, and embrace new technologies that can reduce risk while boosting efficiency.

To help manage this new landscape, we take a look at some common intercompany tax challenges in the current environment, leading practices from industry experience, and how technology can enable the transformation of both intercompany and tax operations.

Why intercompany tax matters

Intercompany activity touches nearly every corner of a multinational organization. Whether it’s cross-border services, inventory flows, IP charges, or financing transactions, these exchanges give rise to tax exposures across jurisdictions. Today, major regulatory shifts are reshaping how intercompany transactions are designed, governed, and reported. The growing influence of Pillar Two, the resurgence of transfer pricing scrutiny, and the expansion of e-invoicing mandates mean organizations may want to proactively think about planning considerations. 

Tax rules increasingly shape financial statements, systems design, and operational processes—making tax-competent intercompany management, with tax embedded across the intercompany process, essential for both tax and controllership. 

Understanding the Intercompany Accounting Framework

A well-designed intercompany framework can help organizations manage their global operations with clarity, consistency, and compliance. Tax and transfer pricing considerations are critical components embedded throughout the framework. When tax requirements are not embedded across these components, organizations may risk misstatements, compliance issues, and inefficiencies throughout the business.

At a glance -> The Intercompany Accounting Framework

  • Transaction management – Defining and recording intercompany transactions appropriately
  • Data management – Promoting accuracy, completeness, and tax-ready data
  • Netting and settlement – Executing timely settlement while managing cross-border tax implications
  • Intercompany pricing – Applying arm’s-length transfer pricing and monitoring compliance
  • Reconciliation and elimination – Addressing differences and avoiding consolidation challenges
  • Governance and policies – Establishing clear documentation and controls

Types of intercompany tax to consider

Intercompany transactions touch multiple forms of tax—each with its own rules, documentation requirements, and potential financial implications. Understanding these tax types is essential for organizations looking to design compliant and scalable processes.

Key tax types affecting intercompany activity:

  • Corporate income tax – Transfer pricing directly influences profit allocation across jurisdictions and remains a focus for tax authorities.
  • Pillar Two (global minimum tax) – The new 15% global minimum tax adds significant complexity: Calculations are tightly integrated with financial statement presentation, requiring detailed disclosures, deferred tax considerations, and alignment with US GAAP or IFRS®.
  • Withholding tax – Intercompany payments—royalties, interest, services—may trigger withholding obligations, often requiring treaty analysis and documentation.
  • Consumption tax (VAT/GST) – Intercompany sales may be taxable, especially in cross-border or multi-jurisdictional settlements.
  • Digital services tax (DST) – Intercompany digital interactions, including the use of centralized platforms or data monetization, can fall under DST rules in some jurisdictions.
  • Customs duties – Authorities may challenge declared transfer prices on intercompany imports if values are not at arm’s length or properly documented.
  • Transfer tax – Intercompany asset or IP transfers may trigger these or other transactional taxes.

The mix of different considerations and obligations with these tax types reveals the complexity and risk involved in intercompany operations—especially for cross-border relationships when entities span multiple tax regimes.

Common challenges across organizations and leading practices for intercompany tax excellence

Many organizations struggle with intercompany tax due to a mix of process gaps, organizational silos, and manual workarounds. Some common issues include:

  • Processes that are not tax-sensitized across all tax types.
  • Limited monitoring of tax implications throughout the year.
  • The misconception that “it all nets out in consolidation.”
  • Weak collaboration between accounting and tax teams.
  • Year-end challenges requiring material adjustments.
  • Heavy reliance on manual processes with inconsistent documentation.
  • Lack of clarity around transaction components.
  • Misalignment with transfer pricing policies.
  • Inconsistent reconciliation between customs values and accounting.
  • Missing or invalid VAT/GST invoices.

These challenges can create compliance exposure, increase audit scrutiny, and cause significant operational inefficiencies. They highlight the need for integrated, upstream solutions.

Organizations are addressing these challenges through a combination of governance, collaboration, and technology. Companies that successfully address intercompany tax complexities may apply leading practices that include:

  • Strengthening cross-functional collaboration between accounting, tax, and transfer pricing teams.
  • Implementing centralized governance, supported by clear policies and standardized processes.
  • Leveraging technology-driven automation to reduce manual effort and improve auditability.
  • Standardizing intercompany entries with tax-sensitive templates.
  • Ensuring accurate consumption tax determination at the point of transaction.
  • Integrating intercompany activity into e-invoicing and e-reporting systems.
  • Using tools that monitor transfer pricing, customs declarations, and indirect taxes in a connected way.

These practices can not only help reduce risk but also accelerate close cycles and improve visibility across the organization.

In a recent Dbriefs webcast, Managing intercompany: Navigating new challenges and tax complexities, 4,114 participants were polled from jobs across the finance, accounting, and tax landscape to explore the challenges and complexities in today’s intercompany tax environment.

When asked about the most challenging areas of intercompany tax management, nearly 60% of participants responded that data quality and reconciliation and transfer pricing documentation present the greatest challenges for their organization.

Controllership and tax: A strategic partnership

Historically, controllership and tax teams have often worked in silos—each with different priorities, data needs, and timelines. However, today’s regulatory environment demands a more connected approach. The relationship between controllership and tax teams can unlock value through collaboration and transform intercompany outcomes.

At a glance

  • Siloed teams – May struggle with inconsistent requirements and mismatched policies, miss critical elements in process design, require frequent reconciliations and adjustments, and overlook key transactions.
  • Connected tax and controllership teams – A strong partnership between tax and controllership teams supports the seamless integration of tax requirements into finance and accounting processes, resulting in the improved accuracy of intercompany design and streamlined compliance and reporting.

Stronger collaboration unlocks significant value and leads to fewer surprises; better audit outcomes; and a more resilient, compliant, and efficient intercompany accounting environment.

There is a need for more collaboration across teams. While 40% of poll respondents felt there is some collaboration (with a few silos) across functions, 70% believe their organization’s tax and controllership teams can collaborate more to drive more value and efficiency for the organization.

How to strengthen collaboration

  • Involve both tax and accounting early when designing new intercompany transactions.
  • Encourage joint assessments between tax advisers and accounting advisers.
  • Establish shared key performance indicators and accountability across both teams.

Transforming intercompany tax and building a future-ready model with automation and technology

The next frontier in managing intercompany tax lies in advanced technology and automation—a critical enabler for modern intercompany and tax operations. As organizations accelerate digital transformation and modernize their finance systems, there is a significant opportunity to unlock enterprise value and transform intercompany tax operations with a connected, tech-enabled intercompany ecosystem.

Potential automation opportunities

  • Apply transfer pricing rules consistently across the enterprise.
  • Monitor transfer pricing on a continuous basis.
  • Evaluate indirect tax implications automatically.
  • Integrate intercompany transactions with e-invoicing and e-reporting tools.
  • Support timely Pillar Two calculations and impact assessments.

Potential innovative technology solutions

Organizations are increasingly using advanced tools to transform intercompany tax, including:

  • Automated preparation of local transfer pricing documentation.
  • Artificial intelligence (AI)-driven forecasting to model policy, rate, or regulatory changes.
  • Near real-time recommendations for transfer pricing adjustments.
  • Integrated platforms that connect accounting, tax, customs, and statutory reporting.

Automation, real-time monitoring, and AI insights enable accuracy and agility, and with the appropriate technology, organizations can shift intercompany tax from a reactive task to a strategic capability.

According to our Dbriefs webcast poll, 70% of participants responded that AI/machine learning (ML) as well as data analytics and dashboards are the most promising for addressing intercompany tax complexity. While some industries identified data analytics as the most critical tool for addressing complexities, AI and ML were perceived as the most promising tools for the future of intercompany tax by the majority of respondents across industries.

Intercompany tax management may no longer be a control requirement—it can be a value opportunity. By strengthening collaboration between controllership and tax, establishing a robust intercompany framework, and leveraging automation and emerging technologies, organizations can navigate rising complexity with confidence. For finance and accounting leaders, the goal is often to transform intercompany from a compliance challenge into a source of operational clarity, efficiency, and strategic insight.

To explore additional considerations and leading practices from industry guests for managing the increasing complexities with intercompany tax, listen to our Dbriefs webcast on demand: Managing intercompany: Navigating new challenges and tax complexities

Stay ahead—explore the latest in controllership now!