We’re entering an age of AI agent proliferation.1 Soon, many enterprises won’t just run a few experimental AI agents (see the “What is an AI agent?” sidebar); they’ll likely have thousands working across their organizations, interacting with data, tools, systems, and even each other. Some, probably, will be tightly specialized, others more general-purpose. Many could be reusable across different departments. And all of them together—if not properly managed—could invite disarray, inefficiency, and cybersecurity threats.
So, how can you scale agentic AI without losing control? One solution may be to allow your teams to only access agents that have been pre-vetted and thoroughly tested in an enterprise AI agent marketplace—one you build yourself or access via a third party.
In artificial intelligence, an intelligent agent is an entity that perceives its environment, takes actions autonomously to achieve goals, and may improve its performance through machine learning or by acquiring knowledge.2
Deloitte has predicted that 25% of companies that use generative AI will likely launch agentic AI proofs of concept in 2025, potentially growing to 50% in the next two years.3 Growing adoption could be proof that the performance of these agentic systems is significantly improving, as businesses tend to adopt technologies more readily when they observe improvements in effectiveness.4 As the trustworthiness of AI outputs continues to increase, agents will likely be systematically integrated into more and more solutions.
Right now, many teams across many organizations are building their own agents in silos. 5 One team might work with an existing agentic framework (used by developers to build and deploy agents), another with a different reputable framework, and yet another with a tool from a promising startup.
This is normal with emerging tech, but it’s not sustainable. As more AI agents start interacting with business systems, data, and even each other, risks increase: Agents might duplicate each other’s work and operate from different governance models, potentially causing misalignment between objectives. They could also mistake malicious software for customers, accidentally reveal sensitive information to clients, or pass need-to-know information (such as salary details) to one another that can easily fall into the wrong hands internally.
For these agents to work in harmony—and for organizations to ensure security—AI agents will need to exist within some form of controlled ecosystem. Prominent hyperscalers and agentic companies seem to agree. CrewAI,6 Google Cloud Platform,7 Amazon Web Services,8 Microsoft Azure,9 and LangChain or LangGraph10 all appear to be placing bets on agentic AI marketplaces.
Think of a marketplace as the enterprise equivalent of an app store, where users can subscribe to deployable AI agents. It’s more than a place to publish and reuse AI agents across teams.11 A well-designed marketplace gives you:
Agent marketplaces can be built internally by enterprises or run by a third party (external marketplaces). Enterprises can use internal marketplaces to release and manage customized AI solutions that address specific objectives. External marketplaces provide complementary AI agents that can seamlessly integrate with internal solutions, enriching their capabilities and extending their effectiveness to meet broader business needs.
Just as mobile apps saw rapid proliferation after open-source app stores arrived, external marketplaces are showing signs of early growth as developers rush to create reusable agents for them.15 Many enterprises likely will soon source agents from trusted third parties—but only if they can run them securely within their own governed environment.
External marketplaces are starting to emerge as the open, go-to platforms for discovering, publishing, and subscribing to AI agents that can automate workflows, analyze data, and interact with customers.16 These marketplaces make it easier for companies to tap into innovation from third-party developers—whether by buying prebuilt agents, subscribing to specialized tools, or sharing internally developed ones with the broader ecosystem.17 As AI agents become more heterogeneous and are hosted in different environments (internal and external), they also need to become more interconnected through standard protocols. Adopting a marketplace approach could achieve this while also helping to reduce risks, which could in turn help to promote industry growth for AI agents. As these platforms grow, they’ll likely play a big role in how enterprises source and scale AI capabilities—but only if integrated into a secure, governed internal environment.
Internal marketplaces are either built from scratch specifically for an organization or purchased from external vendors and put through a rigorous vetting process before being released to employees internally. They’re curated environments where teams can publish, discover, reuse, and govern AI agents with full control. This concept is similar to a data products marketplace, which can enable organizations to exchange, share, and trade pre-vetted data to drive digital transformation and enhance algorithm training.18
With an effective internal marketplace, agents are vetted for compliance, tagged with metadata, version-controlled, and monitored through their life cycle. Teams can see what’s already available before building from scratch, which can help reduce duplication and speed up deployment. Internal marketplaces also provide a centralized approach to managing, monitoring, and optimizing AI agents, ensuring that performance, security, and accountability are built in from day one.
In short, the internal marketplace isn’t just a repository—it becomes the backbone of safe, efficient, and trusted AI agent adoption across the enterprise. For instance, when the compliance team seeks to automate regulatory reporting, they can access this marketplace to find pre-approved AI agents that can be easily integrated into their workflow. Each AI agent in the marketplace will already have been vetted for security and compliance, ensuring that risk is minimized while operational efficiency is maximized.
Here are a few lessons we’ve learned by working with large organizations:
If you want to scale AI agents safely and reliably, you’ll need a marketplace to manage them—just like organizations manage the data and apps their teams use. This will provide the foundation for making AI agents work at scale, with the right mix of control, flexibility, and visibility. Enterprises that take the time to get this right could be the ones that benefit from the AI agent wave—without drowning in it.