November 6, 2026
The Minister of Finance and National Revenue, the Honourable François-Philippe Champagne, presented Budget 2026 entitled “Masters of our Destiny” in the House of Commons on November 5, 2026.
A summary of the tax highlights contained in the budget is provided below.
For those hoping to see more pro-growth-oriented tax reforms or an announcement of a broader tax reform process, Budget 2026 delivered a narrower focus on administrative simplification. In this regard, Deloitte and other organizations have been calling for a reduction in the reliance on income tax and an increase in consumption taxes, as outlined in our perspective on meaningful tax reform in December 2025. Aside from the Productivity Mega Deduction (PMD), this government has shown little interest in pursuing broad-based pro-growth tax reforms of this nature. In fact, the term “Productivity Mega Deduction” occurs over 70 times in the Budget, highlighting its importance as a centrepiece of the government’s tax policy. As a reminder, the PMD increased the type of depreciable assets eligible for immediate expensing from approximately 15% to more than 65% of assets—with buildings (other than manufacturing) and certain intangible assets being the notable exclusions.
The Liberals’ 2025 election platform had promised an expert led corporate tax review, which many in the tax community were waiting to see unfold. It appears that this platform commitment is underway, albeit in a different form than many had expected. The initial results can be seen as a theme throughout this Budget which the government is highlighting as a series of simplification measures.
The first package of tax simplification measures is described in the Budget as the “most ambitious tax simplification effort in decades,” which are generally intended to simplify the tax measures affecting individuals and businesses. The description may be accurate in a historical sense but reflects as much the limited simplification undertaken over previous decades by successive governments as the stated ambition of these reforms. These measures do not have a significant revenue impact but are intended to modernize tax administration. A second tranche of measures is promised for the Spring Economic Update.
In addition to administrative simplification, the government has launched several focused consultations on topics such as corporate loss transfers and the potential for broader modernization of the taxable preferred share regime. Consultations are scheduled to close in early January 2027, suggesting that the government intends to continue to move at a brisk pace to complete its promised tax review, albeit through an informal process. The corporate loss transfer regime could be particularly meaningful, although efforts have been attempted before in 1985 and 2010 without success. We are optimistic that this time will be different.
The government continues to focus its productivity and growth agenda through scaling up existing businesses. To that end, a new capital gains exemption was announced for investments by individuals in certain Canadian businesses of up to $15 million per qualifying individual in respect of each business. This measure is as an alternative to (but not a replacement of) the existing lifetime capital gains exemption regime for qualifying small business corporations (QSBCs). The expansion is significant, at an estimated cost of $565 million over five years, and will provide significant tax relief to successful investors, employees, and founders of Canadian grown businesses.
Complementing this incentive is an expanded small business rollover regime, where individuals will have three years to reinvest capital in small businesses and be eligible for a tax deferral, along with fewer restrictions on the nature of the investments. These measures are welcome and are broadly aligned with what many had called for to encourage continued investment in growing Canadian businesses.
Scientific Research and Experimental Development (SR&ED) tax incentive program expansion continues with a further $930 million over five years which will allow companies to include commercialization costs as eligible for the investment tax credits (ITCs). At $235 million annually once fully implemented, the expansion is approximately 5% of the current annual fiscal cost of the SR&ED program.
In addition to encouraging capital investment for growing businesses and commercialization, the government is providing greater certainty on clean technology investments and expanding the refundable tax credit program first announced in the 2022 Fall Economic Statement. The Clean Technology and Clean Electricity ITCs, scheduled to phase out in 2033 and expire in 2034, are now extended for a further six years until the end of 2040 and are aligned with the Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage ITC. We were pleased to see this, which is consistent with a recommendation we had called for in our consultation submission earlier this year. A domestic content bonus was also proposed, subject to consultation, while there was no mention of labour requirements. No mention of extension for the other Clean Economy ITCs such as Clean Technology Manufacturing or Clean Hydrogen ITCs, which remain scheduled to expire in 2034. The Mineral Exploration Tax Credit and the Critical Mineral Exploration Tax Credit were also extended to March 31, 2032.
The PMD is the primary tax incentive favouring business investment. The government continues to focus almost exclusively on the marginal effective tax rate (METR) as the metric that best captures the competitiveness of Canada’s business tax environment. Although the METR is indeed an important measure of overall competitiveness and an incentive to invest in a broad range of productivity enabling capital properties, we do not consider it a sufficient response to the competitiveness pressures facing the country. We describe the METR metric in our Spring Economic Update 2026 tax alert.
While the METR places Canada as first in the G7 for overall tax competitiveness, as indicated in the government’s own analysis, the benefits of the PMD on the METR are not distributed evenly across all sectors of the economy. In addition, the METR ignores the impact of statutory rates on planning decisions by medium and large businesses with respect to the location of investment. In short, faced with higher tax rates in Canada than other competing jurisdictions, these organizations tend to earn higher economic returns, including those related to the development and commercialization of intellectual property (IP), outside of Canada.
The government appears to believe that the PMD is an adequate response to the competitiveness pressures arising from corporate tax reforms recently enacted in the US. Canada had a sustained corporate tax rate advantage compared to the US 10 years ago; however, that has since become a sustained disadvantage. For medium and large businesses, the situation is even more challenging because of favourable regimes introduced by the US with respect to the taxation of international income. In addition, large Canadian-headquartered businesses now must contend with increased tax costs under the new global minimum tax whereas the burden of this system on US firms is significantly less.
The impact of tax and trade pressures is having an adverse impact on business investment (and the tax base) in Canada. In many cases, the deleterious impacts of these pressures will only reveal themselves in time. While we commend the government’s ambitious efforts to create interest and confidence in business investment in Canada and we encourage measures enabling infrastructure investments that distribute benefits widely, we observe that these various support programs tend to benefit selected industries. That leaves many Canadian medium and large businesses—employing half of private sector workers—having to compete against businesses established elsewhere and operating in significantly more competitive tax environments.
Canada’s personal income tax (PIT) rates are also high and top marginal rates apply at far lower thresholds than in the US, making Canada’s PIT rates an impediment to attracting and retaining top talent. Canada has much to offer entrepreneurial risk-takers who will make the investments that will drive productivity growth. In addition, the Canada Growth Incentive (CGI) and other targeted measures will assist in the effort to attract and retain certain individuals. However, PIT policy must also be responsive to the realities of the competing options available to a broader profile of talented individuals.
We recognize that Canada’s fiscal room is limited. That is why, for example, we see the benefits of an increase in the Goods and Services Tax/Harmonized Services Tax (GST/HST) rate (with relief to fully protect low-income families) to help pay for broad-based income tax relief. Notwithstanding the political aversions to increasing consumption taxes—even in a progressive manner—we consider this a necessary part of an ambitious tax reform agenda. Given the significant budgetary pressures, we’d also, for example, consider limiting the use of the government’s balance sheet to finance or backstop new investments or business subsidies in favour of more reliance on the private sector capital formation. This too could help finance broad-based income tax relief.
Our perspective is that the current economic situation demands a more ambitious tax reform agenda. The risk of a quiet, ongoing migration of business investment out of Canada is significant. To avoid a situation in the future requiring costly remedial policy action, we urge the government to make tax reform a priority now.
A new $15 million capital gains exemption has been proposed as part of a two-part Canada Growth Incentive (CGI). Applicable to Canadian-resident individuals, the new measure allows for an exemption of $15 million on capital gains realized on the disposition of qualifying shares of a qualifying corporation issued on or after November 5, 2026 and before 2037. The exemption is not a lifetime limit but may be multiplied over investments in qualifying shares in multiple businesses.
A three-prong test:
The current rules allow for deferral of taxation on the disposition of qualifying shares of an eligible small business corporation (ESBC) provided replacement ESBC shares are acquired in a prescribed time frame. Budget 2026 proposed to amend the rollover rule for shares disposed of on or after January 1, 2027, as follows:
Budget 2026 modernizes GST/HST import-relief provisions to align with current customs rules and classifications. While many changes preserve existing relief, substantive changes include extending relief for qualifying temporary imports from 12 to 18 months and expanding relief in certain other circumstances.
Budget 2026 proposes to allow qualifying financial institutions to obtain CRA pre-approval of their GST/HST input tax credit allocation methodologies for three fiscal years, rather than requiring annual approval. While the change should reduce the administrative burden associated with annual applications and provide greater certainty, the proposed rules do not expressly provide a mechanism to modify an approved methodology for the second or third year, which may limit flexibility where an institution’s business, activities or allocation methodology changes during the approval period.
In Budget 2026, the government has confirmed its intent to proceed with a number of the proposed and previously introduced measures after having taken into account consultations and deliberations since their release. Of note, the following measures were included: