By: Nicole Luft | Andreas Tsalikis | Jeff Pober
Midmarket banks are on the verge of an AI revolution. As AI moves from pilots to day-to-day banking, access is quickly expanding: 60% of professionals now have generative AI (GenAI) and agentic AI tools, up 50% from last year, according to Deloitte’s State of AI in the Enterprise survey.1 AI use cases are spreading rapidly across midmarket banks, from modernizing back-office systems to enhancing customer service, sales, and marketing.
These AI banking applications have delivered efficiency and productivity gains. But, while cost reduction matters, efficiency is becoming table stakes. The bigger opportunity is differentiation—using AI to drive growth, improve customer experience, and strengthen competitiveness.2 Yet those prospects will remain limited and risky without AI governance. Ahead, we’ll explore AI and regulatory compliance for midmarket banks and how governance and controls can unlock AI’s potential.
Let’s start with the elephant in the room: AI governance has fallen behind AI deployment.3 As with earlier innovation waves, AI adoption is moving faster than the guardrails around it. Our AI survey found that only 21% of organizations have a mature governance model for autonomous AI agents.4
Fortunately, that’s beginning to change. New AI governance frameworks, including COSO, ISO/IEC 42001, and the NIST AI Risk Management Framework, are emerging to help organizations build controls equal to AI’s speed, autonomy, and complexity. We’re also seeing more banks establish AI governance committees.
Banks have strong risk management and model governance capabilities, but those frameworks were designed for technologies that are easier to monitor than AI. AI introduces risks that these traditional control environments weren’t built to address: model drift, bias accumulation, confident but inaccurate outputs, and always-on systems that change rapidly.
The good news: Banks do not need to start from scratch. Existing governance and enterprise risk management structures can provide the foundation, but they must evolve to support continuous monitoring, faster escalation, and AI-specific controls.
AI governance is more than an AI use policy. It demands clear standards for validation, monitoring, residual risk assessment, and alignment to the bank’s risk appetite and control environment. It also requires clear roles and collaboration across the business, risk and compliance, technology, legal, and internal audit functions.
When those groups align, governance is more likely to enable innovation than slow it down. The goal is not to create a parallel bureaucracy around AI, but to embed oversight into how use cases are designed, approved, deployed, and monitored.
Most banks rely on third-party AI and adapt it to their environments. But even when the technology comes from a vendor, accountability does not. Third-party AI risk management is still evolving, so vendor controls alone are not enough to manage reputational, regulatory, operational, and customer risk. AI risk remains the bank’s risk. The business should own use and outcomes, risk and compliance should provide oversight, and internal audit should deliver independent assurance.
Most banks rely on third-party AI and adapt it to their environments. But even when the technology comes from a vendor, accountability does not. Third-party AI risk management is still evolving, so vendor controls alone are not enough to manage reputational, regulatory, operational, and customer risk. AI risk remains the bank’s risk.
Many banks are focused on AI’s efficiency. But its greater potential may lie in enabling stronger customer experiences, differentiation, and growth. Examples from the Deloitte AI Institute’s Financial Services AI Dossier illustrate the point:5
What do these use cases have in common? They are customer-facing, data-intensive, and high risk. To scale them safely, banks need strong governance, controls, and accountability—especially around compliance, model behavior, and data security. Organizations that treat governance as a strategic capability will be better positioned to move AI from pilot to production and capture value.
Drawing on Deloitte’s governance experience and methodology, these practical steps can help midmarket banks strengthen their AI governance models:
Deloitte delivers responsible, tested, human-led, AI-powered innovation, turning bold ideas into practical, trusted solutions. Deloitte’s AI-enabled offerings, combined with extensive industry, domain, and regulatory experience, can transform financial complexity into strategic clarity. Our approach is grounded in quality, integrity, and transparency.
Deloitte can advise midmarket banks on navigating the challenges of fast-moving AI. We offer a wide range of AI-related services, from education and workforce upskilling in our AI academies to AI risk management, governance, control design, monitoring, and testing. To learn more, download our State of AI in the Enterprise report, visit our services page, contact your Deloitte representative, or reach out to us directly.
1. Jim Rowan et al., State of AI in the Enterprise: The untapped edge, Deloitte, January 2026.
2. Ibid.
3. Ibid.
4. Ibid.
5. Deloitte, The Financial Services AI Dossier, Deloitte AI Institute™, December 2025.
The services described herein are illustrative in nature and are intended to demonstrate our experience and capabilities in these areas; however, due to independence restrictions that may apply to audit clients (including affiliates) of Deloitte & Touche LLP, we may be unable to provide certain services based on individual facts and circumstances.
This publication contains general information only and Deloitte is not, by means of this publication, rendering accounting, business, financial, investment, legal, tax, or other professional advice or services. This publication is not a substitute for such professional advice or services, nor should it be used as a basis for any decision or action that may affect your business. Before making any decision or taking any action that may affect your business, you should consult a qualified professional advisor. Deloitte shall not be responsible for any loss sustained by any person who relies on this publication.
As used in this document, “Deloitte” means Deloitte & Touche LLP, a subsidiary of Deloitte LLP. Please see www.deloitte.com/us/about for a detailed description of our legal structure. Certain services may not be available to attest clients under the rules and regulations of public accounting.
Copyright © 2026 Deloitte Development LLC. All rights reserved.