Why does artificial intelligence drive bigger returns in some organizations than in others?
The secret might not always be in the technology itself. Sure, that’s important, but often, there’s another key ingredient: Which C-suite leaders are steering the agenda, and how well do they actually work together?
To explore this question, Deloitte ran a predictive analysis using our proprietary Tech Value data. In a survey of 550 business and technology leaders conducted in April and May 2025, we sought to understand how the degree to which a given C-suite leader owns IT decision-making corresponds with positive AI outcomes. Rather than take a surface-level view, we traced exactly which C-suite roles hold sway over AI investment decisions—zooming in on the degree of participation from chief technology officers, chief financial officers, chief strategy officers, and others. Then, we measured results using a robust set of indicators: perceived improvements in return on investment from technology, movement across 46 operational and financial key performance indicators, and reported earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) gains over the past year.
The findings: It’s not just about technologists at the helm; it’s a partnership game. When the right leaders—think the chief technology officer, chief financial officer, and chief strategy officer—own certain and share other aspects of technology investment decisions, organizations could be far more likely to see outsized results, including above-average EBITDA, greater progress on KPIs, and advances in tech capabilities. Each executive brings a unique value lens: technical capability, financial discipline, strategic alignment, or risk management. When these perspectives combine, they can drive smarter bets and bigger impact.
Deloitte’s 2025 Tech Value Survey found that chief information officers and chief technology officers are still the driving force behind most technology decisions, according to 60% to 80% of respondents, with the two generally co-owning legacy modernization, information automation and business support, and other decisions. This can help organizations build strong technical capabilities, but it also raises a big question: When should other leaders—the chief financial officer, chief strategy officer, and even the chief human resources officer—get more deeply involved in AI investment, given its potential impacts on everything from talent to operations and the bottom line?
However, when CTOs are the primary decision-makers, these companies often invest less aggressively in new data monetization initiatives. This pattern could reflect several factors: CTOs may be operating under more constrained budgets, focusing on maximizing ROI from current assets rather than expanding into new projects, or prioritizing cost savings over growth-oriented investments.
What’s also notable is that CFOs in our survey tend to take a more cautious approach when forecasting AI-driven ROI out for three years, but when they’re hands-on in the process, their confidence in meeting automation program milestones grows. These dynamics seem to highlight the potential benefit of a close partnership between the CTO and CFO for achieving both technical progress and financial discipline.
In practice, this could mean that CSOs are called on either to refocus technology investments that have plateaued or to help clarify and maximize the broader strategic value of digital transformation initiatives.
These findings appear to indicate that who owns technology investment decisions has real business implications across the system of ownership and directly relates to AI automation ROI expectations over the next three years (figure 4).
The predictive analysis, as a system of value drivers and outcomes, suggests:
Taken together, these patterns suggest that AI-driven business outcomes peak when decision rights are distributed among complementary leaders.
AI adoption should be a cross-functional effort. Siloed leadership is unlikely to deliver the versatility, agility, or strategic focus needed to achieve enterprisewide value. Instead, organizations are exploring several new approaches:
AI is creating new markets that call for both depth and breadth of expertise. Collaboration among the CTO or CIO, CFO, and CSO is emerging as a leading practice, balancing technical capability, financial discipline, and strategic alignment. While enterprise strategy can be a guide, as markets and organizations are transforming, leaders should also consider looking across market-sector peers to pulse-check what’s changing and how to forge new paths. A triumvirate of three executive roles has started to emerge as a successful model: the executive tech leader CIO (or CTO, depending on the organizational context), the CFO, and the CSO. Our predictive analysis shows that each of these leaders brings their own unique perspectives and capabilities to balancing the value equation. Success could hinge on these leaders working together on the investment strategy and partnering with transformation, operational, procurement, and human capital leaders to bring the organization forward together.
The path forward is unlikely to look like the past. New roles and responsibilities are emerging. C-suite leaders are being asked to strengthen their “nexus skills,” blending technical fluency, financial literacy, and market awareness. This may call for a willingness to break old models and build new ones, sometimes even merging leadership roles or creating new centers of excellence. It also involves considering industry variation in how leadership mix impacts AI returns. It can further benefit from a shared vision with shared execution.
In short, achieving continuous AI value isn’t just about investing in the right tools; it may also be about ensuring the right mix of C-suite leaders are making decisions together, assessing value holistically, and adapting fast.