Skip to main content

No Business without Nature

“Why do we need to expand our focus from climate to include water and biodiversity?”

“Are my investors and regulators looking into nature at all?”

“Which part of my supply chain is dependent on nature and how can I understand my related risks?”

“TNFD, SBTN, LEAP… What can I practically do now to navigate the acronym jungle for nature?”

These and similar concerns are weighing heavily on the minds of sustainability and business leaders, and increasingly, they are the questions that C-suite executives must be prepared to answer. Our article explores why nature and biodiversity are relevant for businesses, how the evolving policy landscape is shaping action for nature, and what companies can do now to mitigate growing nature-related risks. After all, there is no business without nature.

The crisis is real, and it is affecting your bottom line

The numbers are staggering. Since 1970, global wildlife populations have declined by an average of 73% (WWF, 2024). But it is not just an environmental tragedy, it is also a business crisis. 85% of the world’s largest companies have notable dependencies on natural resources and ecosystem services (S&P, 2023). Consider the essential services nature provides that your business relies on daily. For example, textile manufacturers depend on freshwater supply for production and dyeing processes, while food companies depend on soil formation and pollination to secure crop yield and ensure volume and pricestability.

Ecosystem services are not luxuries; they are operational necessities. The World Economic Forum’s 2026 Global Risks Report ranked biodiversity loss and ecosystem collapse as the second most severe risk for the economy over the next decade. These risks manifest in various forms, including:

  • Physical risks: acute risks such as wildfires or oil spills and chronic risks such as pollinator loss or freshwater scarcity
  • Transition risks: policy shifts and evolving consumer expectations towards nature-positive products and services

A major food company sources ingredients from agricultural regions facing severe soil degradation and pollinator decline. The company’s risk assessment revealed that 40% of its key crop suppliers operate in areas where soil health is deteriorating due to intensive farming practices and biodiversity loss– creating exposure to declining yields and rising commodity prices that could significantly increase input costs for the business.

The solution? The company partnered with suppliers to implement regenerative agriculture practices that restore soil health and support pollinator populations.

The result: Improved crop resilience, reduced input costs, and a supply chain less vulnerable to future ecosystem collapse. Additionally, the company’s sustainability credentials strengthened its brand positioning with environmentally conscious consumers and investors.

A major pharmaceutical company relies on horseshoe crab blood to produce Limulus Amebocyte Lysate (LAL), a critical component used to test vaccines and injectable drugs for bacterial contamination. Horseshoe crabs are harvested from coastal ecosystems, and populations are declining due to habitat loss and overharvesting.

This creates a dual risk: (1) supply scarcity driving up costs and limiting production capacity, and (2) regulatory pressure to transition away from wild-harvested resources. The company is investing in synthetic alternatives to LAL, reducing dependence on wild populations while securing long-term supply chain resilience. This proactive move also positions the company as an innovation leader and demonstrates commitment to sustainable sourcing - a key differentiator for investors increasingly focused on nature-related risks.

The growing global momentum that shapes the policy and regulatory landscape

Nature and biodiversity are gaining significant global momentum, following a trajectory similar to how climate has risen on the corporate priority agenda over the past 5 to 10 years.

Comparable to the Paris Agreement for climate, a similar agreement for biodiversity was adopted by 196 countries in December 2022: The Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework. Often referred to as the Global Biodiversity Framework (GBF), its primary objective is to halt and reverse nature loss by 2030. Target 15 of the GBF outlines the role of businesses and financial institutions in tackling nature loss. This requires large companies to assess, monitor, and disclose their impacts and dependencies on nature, with the 196 governments implementing and reinforcing the required local frameworks by 2030.

Since this landmark agreement, a number of mandatory and voluntary frameworks have emerged to support organisations in structuring their nature-related assessments:

The Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive includes ESRS E4 on Biodiversity and Ecosystems, covering both companies’ own operations and their value chain. Companies subject to the CSRD must develop transition plans on biodiversity and ecosystems.

The Taskforce on Nature-related Financial Disclosures is a voluntary framework designed to help companies assess their nature-related risks and opportunities. Over 700 organisations are already committed to TNFD-aligned reporting (TNFD, 2025). Furthermore, TNFD is set to be integrated into the global reporting standards of the International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB) – announced at COP30. This signals that nature-related financial disclosures are becoming standardised similar to climate reporting.

The Science Based Targets Network developed guidance for companies to set science-based targets for nature (freshwater, land, biodiversity and ocean), leveraging the momentum from the adoption of the SBTi climate targets.

Just as the Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Protocol standardised carbon accounting, a Nature Measurement Protocol is currently being developed to standardise how companies measure and report nature-related impacts – as announced at COP30.

The climate-nature nexus: a dual opportunity

Climate and nature loss are not isolated crises; they are interconnected challenges that demand synergistic solutions.

Natural Climate Solutions (NCS),  such as reforestation, wetland restoration, and regenerative agriculture, can provide up to one-third of the cost-effective climate mitigation required by 2030 to meet Paris Agreement goals. Yet, their value extends far beyond carbon reduction:

  • Strengthened food security through more resilient agricultural systems
  • Better water quality from restored ecosystems
  • Cleaner air from healthy forests and wetlands
  • Enhanced community resilience in vulnerable regions

Moreover, NCS currently cost less than many technological alternatives, such as carbon capture and storage. Incoporating these solutions into your company’s decarbonisation pathway is not only environmentally responsible but also makes a strong business case.

 

What it means for your business – actionable first steps for nature

How can your business begin its journey towards integrating nature into its strategy? We recommend the following steps: 

Conduct a high-level nature dependency assessment to understand why biodiversity or water could be material for your business. Start by raising internal awareness about your organisation’s specific nature dependencies and build a quantified business case for senior leadership to address it.

Analyse the ecosystem services critical to your operations (e.g., water supply, pollination, specific raw materials, etc.). Follow guidance from the TNFD across the “Locate” and “Assess” phases of its LEAP approach.

Understand how your nature dependencies and impacts translate into financial risks and opportunities for your company, following the“Evaluate” phase of TNFD’s LEAP approach. Where possible, quantify these risks financially. 

Develop a clear nature strategy informed by your assessments. Follow SBTN’s AR3T Mitigation Hierarchy (avoid > reduce > restore & regenerate > transform) to systematically reduce your negative impact on nature.

Embed nature-related risks and opportunities within your enterprise risk management framework. Align these with climate risk assessments to capture climate-nature nexus, and embed nature-related metrics into corporate strategy.

Throughout all the steps, ensure continuous internal stakeholder engagement with C-suite and relevant corporate functions (e.g., procurement, risk) and externally with suppliers, investors and local communities, where appropriate.

Various technology solutions are available to support your nature assessment

One of the biggest challenges companies face when developing robust nature assessments is the lack of supply chain transparency. However, this should not be a reason to delay action. You can begin the assessment related to your own sites and tier 1 suppliers, where you have geolocation data available. Below is a non-exhaustive list of useful tools to support your nature-related assessments. Refer to the TNFD Tools Catalogue for further nature-related data tools available on the market. 

For further assessments beyond tier-1 suppliers, you can also leverage AI-enabled technological solutions to enhance supply chain visibility. Examples include Deloitte’s SupplyHorizon and EXIOBASE tools.

If you would like to explore this topic more, whether you are just beginning to understand nature-related risks or already have a defined nature program in place, we are here to help you navigate this transition.

Did you find this useful?

Thanks for your feedback

Our thinking