Deloitte: Can you describe what smart factory is for you?
Daniel Meier: Smart factory concepts usually involve a combination of humans and machines, of process knowledge and new manufacturing technologies. Since the picture is changing all the time “smart” means finding the best combination, at any given point in time, for manufacturing processes. At Burckhardt Compression we do not have a high repetition of processes and are therefore not doing a lot of data simulation or machine learning, by way of example. Despite this, we will still need to master a broad range of technologies and processes to optimise our manufacturing capability.
Deloitte: What is your smart factory strategy and vision?
Daniel Meier: We recently launched a new five-year initiative at our Swiss manufacturing location, which is driven by two elements, i.e., high productivity and high flexibility. Smart factory initiatives have the potential to promote the manufacturing location Switzerland despite it being a high-cost location. This is made possible by easy access to experts from diverse areas who can help you to make great productivity gains. Our slogan/vision “Machining 3020” speaks of achieving 30% lead time and 20% cost reduction within the current manufacturing process.
Deloitte: Do you have any best practices to share with regard to the smart factory implementation process?
Daniel Meier: "It is important to be close to the shop floor, start with pilots and enable the organization to realize the transformation on their own."
We have a bottom-up project that has a cell logic and focuses on key value creation areas. Across our 5-6 chosen cells we focus on optimization and lean concepts. There is no one-size-fits-all approach and the depth of automation within each of the cells will be different. We have also initiated a “Digital Innovation Unit” that, together with IT, identifies and optimises customer and business process opportunities across all areas.
Our smart factory project has gone very well so far, confirming that our decision to start and invest in such a journey in the manufacturing location Switzerland, was a good one.
The basic transformation is planned for a period of three years, at the end of which we will be able to observe the physical and optical changes and confirm the use case. This will serve as a basis for the next steps. It will also be important to define and integrate a new culture of work in the smart factory environment, as we did whenever we implemented lean concepts.
Deloitte: What do you see as the biggest challenges of a smart factory implementation process?
Daniel Meier: Currently, the biggest challenge is the consistency of data for an accurate end-to-end view. Good data communication from engineering through to manufacturing or other areas can be tricky in a legacy set-up.
In deciding where it makes sense to make the first changes, it is best to first develop an overall map but then to follow an incremental approach for implementation.
Another challenge is how to deal with the “accordion effect” – the great initial enthusiasm, followed by a decline in momentum when realising how holistic and huge the transformation will need to be. This can impact project scope and progress. Such setbacks however are part of, and offer some important lessons during, the transformation journey.
Deloitte: Do you have the right talent in your company to successfully implement your smart factory plans? What skills and mindset will your employees need in the future smart factory?
Daniel Meier: We have skilled and experienced staff. There is a mix of both internal and external experts with application experience who are tasked with implementation.
Job profiles and required skills are continuously changing on the shop floor. In the past, the work preparation – or AVOR, as it is called in Switzerland – included only tools set-up and controls. Nowadays however, AVOR includes production engineering, as well as data integration, capture, simulation and programming amongst others.
Deloitte: What do you see as the key smart manufacturing trends for your industry in the coming years?
Daniel Meier: So far, we have not identified any “must-have” technologies, however, the possibility that diverse data can be transformed and combined to create added value for processes holds huge potential. New technologies like sensors and networks can facilitate this but you can only make everything smarter, once a good base is established and you have key data available in a stable format.
With regards to augmented reality – we have made some tests in the production environment, but we believe that AR/AV is better suited for customer applications. On the shop floor we prefer mobile devices like tablets for their ability to present relevant information such as drawings, designs etc.
We are observing the 3D printing / additive manufacturing space and have done some testing. However, currently our casting is still happening traditionally. The biggest barrier to entry remains the size of the components, for example – the size of 3D printing equipment, as well as cost of materials and process times. We believe that for the next 10-15 years the conventional casting method will prevail, but 3D printing could be a game changer, specifically for metallic and composite materials, in 20-30 years from now. This will have a fundamental impact on spare parts and logistics services.