The most enduring music is often the result of successful iteration: great songwriters know how to start with what’s proven then expose it to new ideas to produce something of lasting quality. The same can be said of the world of financial reporting standards, where the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) strives to improve them through a process of careful refinement.
One of its more recent achievements is International Financial Reporting Standard 9 Financial Instruments (2014) (“IFRS 9 (2014)”) — the culmination of an effort to simplify the accounting of financial instruments to the benefit of those who prepare, audit and use financial statements. This new standard, set to become mandatory for fiscal years beginning on or after January 1, 2018, holds many advantages over its predecessor, IAS 39 Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement. The most notable of these are:
Although we’re still a few years away from the mandatory effective date, organizations should be getting ready to tackle the work needed to make the transition. They should clearly understand the changes in classification and measurement, impairment and hedge accounting requirements, how these changes will impact them and the level of effort needed to make the transition.
Can we adopt early?
Organizations don’t have to wait until 2018 to start using IFRS 9 (2014). They can adopt the standard in its entirety if they’d like to begin taking advantage of it sooner. Whether or not this is worth doing depends on the industry and types of financial instruments the entity holds. Here are some things to consider:
What if I already adopted an earlier version of IFRS 9?
You may have adopted one of the earlier versions (including 2009, 2010 or 2013). You’ll still be required to adopt the full standard, IFRS 9 (2014), on the mandatory effective date, which means you’ll have to revisit any decisions based on sections that have been changed in IFRS 9 (2014) and readjust as necessary as of January 1, 2018.
What do I need to know about restating on adoption?
The transitional provisions are a complex part of the new standard. Entities have some discretion about restating comparatives, and will have to weigh factors such as the overall comparability of financial statements and the perception of stakeholders. These are the key provisions regarding restatement:
Results worth the effort?
The changes introduced by IFRS 9 are much-needed improvements to the reporting of financial instruments. The logical, principle-based approach to classification and measurement, a single forward-looking impairment model and a substantially-reformed approach to hedge accounting will all enhance investor and stakeholder confidence. The challenge for entities adopting IFRS 9 will be in understanding the scoping, planning and execution needed to ensure a successful implementation.