INDIA ECONOMIC OUTLOOK, JULY 2026
India’s macroeconomic outlook seemed relatively favorable at the start of 2026: Inflation had moderated to 2.1%, its lowest level in years; the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) was contemplating further monetary easing; relief from higher US tariffs and supply-chain uncertainties had boosted investor confidence; and robust domestic demand and resilient growth prompted the RBI governor to describe India’s economic position as a “Goldilocks” phase.
The geopolitical arena has since become more complicated, with the Middle East conflict serving as the latest reminder that geopolitical tensions pose a key risk to global economic stability.
The hostilities underscored the fragility of the RBI’s macroeconomic assumptions, leading it to downgrade its growth projections and raise its inflation expectations, as higher energy prices and trade disruptions due to the blockade of the Strait of Hormuz trickle into the economy.
While the memorandum of understanding signed by the United States and Iran did reduce immediate concerns, structural vulnerabilities associated with an increasingly uncertain geopolitical environment persist. Despite entering the 2026 from a position of relative macroeconomic resilience, India now faces major global headwinds. Deloitte now expects a modest growth rate of 6.5% to 6.8% this fiscal.
But crises often present opportunities:
But these must be complemented by conducive industrial policy and an enabling ecosystem that can drive domestic value addition and progressively reduce India’s import dependence, given many of India’s strategic manufacturing sectors continue to rely heavily on imported inputs. The right industrial policy reforms can help the economy to integrate more effectively into global value chains while lowering its vulnerability to geopolitical and supply-chain disruptions.
In the last fiscal,1 real gross domestic product growth stood at 7.7% year over year (figure 1), beating the government’s first advance estimate (7.4%).2 Growth remained robust in the final quarter (7.8%), indicating resilient domestic demand amid a challenging global backdrop. Real gross value added (GVA) expanded even faster (7.9%), pointing to strength on both demand and supply sides.
The expenditure side of GDP was largely driven by domestic demand.
India’s merchandise trade deficit widened to US$776 billion, but services exports of US$421 billion and remittances worth US$143 billion helped cushion the overall external balance. India also retained its position as the world’s eighth largest services exporter in 2025.3
On the production side, growth was driven by strong performances in both manufacturing and services.
Inflation fell to a multiyear low as food and fuel prices eased, aiding consumer spending. This also resulted in a subdued GDP deflator, keeping nominal GDP growth at 8.9%.
While India ended the last fiscal with strong momentum, vulnerabilities like capital outflows and currency depreciation persisted. Toward the end of the fiscal, these headwinds intensified due to the Middle East conflict.
Entering the new fiscal, India’s growth outlook is increasingly exposed to external headwinds and macro financial risks. Performance in fiscal 2026 to 2027 will likely be shaped by several key risks.
5. Potential delays in the US-India trade deal: The US-India trade deal is in its final phase and will likely help to bring down tariffs on Indian exports to 10%. However, till it is concluded, uncertainty will likely persist. Besides, implementing the arrangement will take time, and it may not come into full effect until the next fiscal.
6. Elevated global inflation and tight monetary policy: Tensions in the Middle East and intermittent disruptions to key trade corridors will likely keep input costs high. Even if freight and insurance markets normalize over the next few quarters, global prices are likely to remain elevated, leading to higher policy rates set by central banks in the West. For example, the European Central Bank announced a rate hike at its June meeting.
7. The RBI’s monetary policy trade-offs: The RBI faces a tough balancing act between promoting growth, maintaining price stability, and keeping currency steady. In June, the RBI kept policy rates unchanged to support credit growth, which has lately improved by 17.7%, the highest level since May 2024, providing a buffer at a time when access to external financing is constrained.
At the same time, the RBI announced five measures to encourage capital inflows, including incentives to attract FCNR(B) deposits11 and exemptions from capital gains tax on government securities. According to a study by the State Bank of India, these measures could bring in US$40 billion to US$45 billion over the next few months and support additional bank deposits of around INR4.5 trillion, thereby boosting banks’ willingness to lend.12
In fact, overseas investors invested a record US$4.2 billion in Indian government bonds in June, marking the strongest inflow into debt instruments since August 2024.
However, if inflation rises due to El Niño effects, the RBI may have to tighten its policy stance. Besides, measures to attract foreign capital will affect the balance sheet, adding risks to liquidity management and long-term financial stability.
Hence, in fiscal 2026 to 2027, economic performance will largely depend on how Indian policymakers navigate an increasingly uncertain external environment without compromising on domestic growth momentum.
We expect economic growth to remain modest in the first half of the year and pick up in the second half, driven by a demand surge during the festival season (October to December) and the gradual easing of geopolitical uncertainties. Trade deals with the United States, United Kingdom, and the European Union are expected to usher in trade and private investments from 2027 onward.
In Deloitte’s optimistic scenario (see “Key assumptions for Deloitte’s projections” for all scenarios), growth in fiscal 2026 and 2027 is likely to range between 6.5% and 6.8% (figure 3), before crossing 7% in the next fiscal year.
The recent US-Iran agreement may likely ease pressure on commodity prices and stabilize investor sentiment, but the conflict has drawn attention to the challenges posed by disruptions in geopolitically sensitive trade corridors.
Building durable external resilience will, therefore, require more than just strong domestic demand—it will also require a stronger trade architecture. In this context, India’s recent FTAs and ongoing trade negotiations assume greater significance.
Over the past two decades, India has signed 22 FTAs, eight of them in the last six years, reflecting a more strategic approach to trade policy. The newer agreements, built on lessons learned from the earlier ones, are not just about market access. They also aim to expand exports, strengthen supply-chain resilience, and diversify trade. But India also needs the right industrial policy reforms to remain competitive as it integrates with global supply chains.
1. Strengthening India’s export footprint strategically: The newer FTAs seek to align India’s competitive strengths with high-demand markets where its export presence remains limited. Successful partnerships with the United Arab Emirates and Mauritius helped secure a larger share of their import demand, suggesting that tariff preferences, policy certainty, and deeper commercial integration can help players expand their presence over time. Trade with Australia has doubled since the FTA was signed, even though cross-sector penetration remains low due to geographical distance and low economic growth.
India is now seeking to replicate this success with countries whose agreements are yet to become operational or have only recently become operational (figure 4). The agreements with the United Kingdom, the United States, and the European Union could create opportunities in electronics, engineering goods, pharmaceuticals, chemicals, textiles, and auto components—sectors where India has growing capabilities but relatively low market penetration.
2. Enabling competitive and resilient value chains through strategic imports: India’s FTAs are often criticized for widening trade deficits (for example, the ASEAN agreement saw imports rise faster than exports over time).13 But these concerns do not fully capture the role imports play in modern manufacturing: Sectors like electronics, machinery, chemicals, and transport equipment depend heavily on imported intermediate inputs and subcomponents and currently have higher import intensity than the manufacturing average (figure 5).
For these, FTAs can help secure diversified access to critical inputs, reduce dependence on concentrated sourcing geographies, and strengthen resilience against geopolitical, trade, and logistical disruptions. These agreements complement industrial initiatives such as the phased manufacturing program. Expanding India’s network of sourcing partners will help enable firms to integrate into—and move up—global manufacturing value chains.
3. Reducing import dependence through complementary industrial policy and a supportive ecosystem: Greater import resilience should not be confused with continued import dependence. Over the long term, India’s competitiveness will increasingly depend on reducing import intensity through higher domestic value addition, stronger supply ecosystems, and tech- and innovation-driven improvements in manufacturing capabilities.
o Industrial policy must complement trade policy: FTAs will help integrate India more deeply into global supply chains and diversify access to critical inputs. At the same time, industrial policies such as production-linked incentives, infrastructure development, and domestic capability creation will enable India to gradually substitute imported intermediates with competitive domestic production.
o A stronger enabling ecosystem to effectively implement FTAs: This would require improving the ease of doing business, easier compliance, awareness of the provisions, and efficient logistics to ensure the FTAs that India signs are implemented and utilized to their full potential.
In short, FTAs can help India sell more to the world and buy more securely from it. But trade agreements must go hand in hand with industrial policy and effective implementation. With preferential market access now spanning 38 countries, India has an unprecedented opportunity to leverage this new trade architecture to create economic advantage.
The Deloitte assumptions used in this analysis can be grouped into two scenario buckets—optimistic and pessimistic—with the former being more likely.
The US-Iran agreement helps improve trade and boosts the global economy. With the Strait of Hormuz open, oil and other essential commodity prices ease to prewar levels by the third quarter of fiscal 2026 to 2027. Trade deals with the European Union and the United States become operational by early 2027. El Niño affects agriculture, but not enough to weaken overall output or drive inflation into a spiral.
The other assumptions are:
The US-Iran agreement improves trade only marginally as the region continues to experience intermittent escalations and supply-chains disruptions. Regions with ongoing conflicts face prolonged economic uncertainty. Global inflation spikes, compelling the United States and the European Union to go ahead with several policy rate hikes.
Trade-related uncertainty continues, and India’s trade deals with Europe and the United States are delayed. As a result, exports decline rapidly, while supply-chain shocks raise costs and disrupt production. Monetary policy remains tight in both the West and India.