Skip to main content
Welcome to Deloitte

If we have selected the wrong experience for you, please change it above.

Meeting the ‘China speed’ challenge in the US auto market

Four considerations for OEMs

Despite transformational change taking place across the automotive sector, most traditional manufacturers have stuck to a few fundamental principles, such as how a vehicle should be designed and, more importantly, how long it should take. Meanwhile, Chinese automakers are quickly rewriting the rules governing vehicle development, upending the competitive landscape in many global markets. How can traditional original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) respond?

Key Takeaways:

  • Chinese automakers are reshaping global competition through faster product development, platform standardization, and digital-first engineering.
  • Traditional US OEMs may need to act now rather than wait, as Chinese competitors continue gaining share globally and could eventually enter the US market.
  • OEMs can potentially close much of the cost gap by standardizing components, making cost a design constraint, and deploying smart manufacturing.
  • Cross-OEM collaboration on non-differentiating parts could reduce costs and development timelines while allowing brands to focus investment on customer-visible innovation.

New competition for incumbent automakers

In the US, policymakers have adopted various China-related policies intended to protect the US auto industry and, more broadly, national security. These include a 100% tariff on Chinese electric vehicles (EVs) and restrictions on certain China-linked connected vehicle hardware and software, alongside other ongoing efforts to limit Chinese influence in the North American auto market. However, even with these policies, some industry executives believe the introduction of China-based automakers in the US is inevitable. At that point, the competitive advantage that incumbents may currently retain would be put to the test as China-based competitors may have already taken the lead in some areas.

The global automotive landscape

A plethora of Chinese OEMs have been gaining traction within their domestic market, increasing from 50% to 67% light vehicle (LV) market share from 2022 to 2025. But with manufacturing overcapacity and weakening demand at home, some OEMs are pushing an export strategy aimed at several global markets. Outside China, Chinese OEMs’ LV share has risen from 2.1% to 6.2% over the same three-year period, with the biggest regional gain coming from Eastern Europe (4.5% to 22.6%), where local production and dealer networks are expanding to sustain long-term growth. Overall, the speed with which Chinese OEMs are executing their growth expansion strategies has been highly disruptive for manufacturers operating in those target markets.

Most of the improvements that could help address differences in cost and speed aren’t only within incumbent OEMs’ control—they’re likely already being embraced and partially implemented. In addition, industry executives interviewed suggest adopting practices that shorten production cycles from 48 to 24 months could potentially save traditional OEMs around $200 million to $600 million per vehicle program.

Traditional automotive manufacturers may not be able to take a wait-and-see approach to addressing the growing challenges presented by their China-based OEM competitors. Structural and operational change will likely be needed to prioritize digital-first product development, leveraging cost as a design constraint, and end-to-end manufacturing automation while maintaining the quality and value consumers expect.

Traditional OEMs should consider working together to share the costs of product development for interchangeable components and platforms that don’t impact brand differentiation or consumer preferences. If these systems are transformed for greater efficiency and cost savings, traditional OEMs may be better positioned to face market newcomers head-on. 

Stand out in an increasingly crowded field

Some of these changes are already in motion while others, like the commonization of parts across competitors, may be harder to implement. But cross-OEM collaboration may prove to be key to competing in the long run. By leaning into a commonization-first approach—prioritizing non-differentiated components that consumers don’t see—incumbent OEMs can likely cut costs, expedite development, and redirect investments toward innovation.

Did you find this useful?

Thanks for your feedback