Skip to main content
Welcome to Deloitte
If we have selected the wrong experience for you, please change it above.

Navigating the Labyrinth: How to Get HR Due Diligence Right in M&A

When M&A transactions falter, the root cause often lies within people-related issues. HR due diligence (HR DD) is therefore not merely a procedural step but a critical workstream that offers people leaders a unique opportunity to make a significant commercial impact. People-related costs, liabilities, and opportunities can materially influence the decision to acquire a company and its valuation. It is no surprise, then, that HR DD is receiving ever-increasing focus from M&A decision-makers.

This article, drawing insights from our recent webinar, delves into key considerations for optimising HR DD, addressing emerging hot topics, and outlining the critical success factors for navigating this complex landscape.

What is HR Due Diligence?

HR DD is the process of identifying, assessing, and quantifying people-related risks and opportunities in transactions. Its purpose is to link HR findings directly to valuation, deal execution, and post-deal planning.

The recent best-practice guideline for HR DD, co-authored by Deloitte and the ICAEW, marks a pivotal moment, establishing HR DD as a key workstream for successful transactions. It provides a comprehensive framework to ensure all aspects of people-related risks are considered, covering:

Understanding the composition, location, and contractual arrangements of the workforce.

Delving into employee turnover, engagement levels, and their underlying drivers.

Assessing compensation, retention arrangements, and contractual positions of key individuals.

Examining salary structures, incentive plans, and their alignment with strategic direction.

Scrutinising pension plans, retiree medical, and the overall generosity of benefit packages.

Evaluating the maturity of HR policies, processes, and systems.

Reviewing collective bargaining agreements, ongoing litigation, and contractual compliance.

Crucially, HR DD is not a one-size-fits-all exercise. It must be meticulously tailored to the target's specific context, considering its size, location, and industry. A small, founder-led start-up with developing HR processes presents different challenges to a large, long-established business with complex reward structures and entrenched labour relations. Similarly, geographical nuances, such as statutory end-of-service payments or varying litigation landscapes, demand specific attention.

What hot topics should HR DD pay particular attention to?

The regulatory and operational environment for HR is in constant flux, introducing new complexities that require careful navigation during due diligence. Here we consider four recent hot topics:

1. Contingent workforce

The rise of the contingent workforce i.e. individuals engaged directly, via personal service companies, or through labour supply chains (e.g., umbrellas, agencies, MSPs) introduces significant complexities.

Key risks include:

Incorrectly classifying individuals as contingent workers when they should be employees can lead to unforeseen liabilities for minimum wage, overtime, pension, holiday, and sick pay. This can significantly increase costs and create practical challenges, as seen in high-profile gig economy cases.

Increased scrutiny from local authorities, high-profile court cases, and potential reputational damage underscore the need for robust compliance.

Complex off-payroll working rules (e.g., IR35 in the UK) can lead to payroll tax liabilities and financial penalties for non-compliance.

During HR DD, it is crucial to review the target's engagement processes, identify gaps in risk management, and assess worker classification. The geographic spread of contingent workers also needs analysis, as this could result in the need to consider differing labour laws, tax rules, and cultural factors.

Buyers should also evaluate how contingent roles fit the new structure and consider integration options, including costs, key person risks, and the legal complexities of novating contracts.

2. Employment Rights Act 2025

The Employment Rights Act 2025 introduces wide-ranging reforms that will significantly reshape the UK employment law landscape, bringing greater cost and reduced flexibility for employers. Purchasers must stress-test these changes during diligence:

From January 2027, unfair dismissal rights will commence at six months' service, significantly reducing employer flexibility. The statutory cap on compensation for unfair dismissal will also be removed, increasing the financial risk of dismissals, particularly for senior executives. The time limit for bringing most employment tribunal claims will be extended to six months, prolonging litigation exposure.

Proposed changes in this area will make it much more difficult to push through certain changes to terms and conditions without employee consent. There are also changes to the thresholds and penalties related to collective redundancies. This puts more onus on buyers to understand current terms and conditions and factor in the increased risk and cost of making any changes, such as harmonising terms post-acquisition.

Established in April 2026, this agency is tasked with enforcing worker rights, including National Minimum Wage, modern slavery, and holiday pay. This represents a significant shift, particularly for holiday pay compliance, as the risk of detection for non-compliance will significantly increase, as will the consequences. Employers will also be required to maintain records documenting holiday pay compliance for six years.

These changes collectively mean less flexibility, greater administration, and increased risk in reshaping businesses, making robust HR DD more critical than ever to assess how these changes affect future business plans.

3. Pensions - Automatic Enrolment Compliance

Automatic Enrolment compliance is complex, and inadvertent material errors frequently arise.

Common scenarios for material inadvertent non-compliance and/or underpaid contribution risks include:

Misapplication of contribution rates for example through pensionable earnings definition or from the interaction with salary sacrifice schemes.

Incorrect assumptions that certain staff (e.g., temporary workers) are not eligible for automatic enrolment.

System and process gaps leading to contribution errors and/or compliance breaches particularly following changes of payroll and/or benefits platform providers.

During HR DD, the full range of pension plans in place and the processes for ensuring compliance should be understood to avoid future significant rectification costs. Protections may be sought in the transaction documents where doubt about historical compliance has been uncovered.

4. Global workforce

The increasing globalisation of work, and the increasing remoteness of workers from workplaces introduces further complexities, particularly for mobile employees and international remote working:

The EU Pay Transparency Directive introduces, amongst other pay transparency measures, expanded gender pay gap reporting, requiring country by country reporting of pay gaps by categories of workers. Where pay differences are present and cannot be objectively justified, employers are required to engage with employee representatives and undertake joint pay assessments. The Directive also enhances individual employee rights related to pay transparency and prohibits salary history inquiries during recruitment.

Diligence processes should include an understanding of employee number and composition (gender and job architecture), readiness to report, and the quantum of existing pay gaps, on a country-by-country basis.  Employees who operate across borders present unique challenges for reporting, as they may distort local reporting and require careful consideration of cross-border pay items, benefits, and allowances.

Many businesses allow employees to work remotely, with appropriate guardrails in place, e.g. a cap on the number of days allowable per annum, the employee must already have the right to work in the location etc., as part of their Employee Value Proposition. Businesses also increasingly utilise long term or permanent remote working to facilitate key international hires, or to retain key talent. Employers of Record (EoRs) are often engaged to support businesses where there is a disconnect between employee location and corporate presence. Diligence should assess whether individuals accessed via EoRs are included in the employee perimeter and consider possible outcomes like local employment, exit, or relocation.

It is important to understand the prevalence or remote working of any form, and where there may be reliance on EoRs to access talent. When planning for the future, HR DD might consider the approach taken to managing remote working risks within a target business to identify any misalignment in culture, policy and process, and to assess incremental or aggregate risk for the combined global workforce post transaction. This includes potential exposure to other local labour laws and tax rules in locations where the business may not have an existing corporate presence.

Setting M&A up for success

To navigate these complex HR landscapes and ensure a successful M&A process, it is critical to keep abreast of the latest regulatory, tax, and employment developments and factor these into HR DD. In light of the issues explored in this article, a HR DD exercise undertaken today should consider asking questions such as:

By adopting an analytical approach, coordinating effectively with other workstreams, and focusing on materiality, it is possible to get a good view of the risks across these topics in the short time available during a diligence process. For a planned integration, it is also important for HR DD to bring in that context and maintain a forward-looking perspective to identify and quantify risks relevant to the buyer and lay the groundwork for value creation post-acquisition.