Skip to main content
Welcome to Deloitte
If we have selected the wrong experience for you, please change it above.

Unlock the AI advantage in commodity trading: Why AI matters

Commodity trading has always operated in complex, fast-moving environments shaped by geopolitics, weather, infrastructure constraints, regulation, and market sentiment. What has changed is the scale and speed of information, alongside growing pressure to improve operational efficiency while managing risk and protecting margins. Traders and operations teams alike are expected to do more, faster, and with greater accuracy.

In this context, Artificial Intelligence (AI), Machine Learning (ML), Generative AI (GenAI), and AI agents are increasingly seen as practical tools to support better decisions and leaner operations across the trade lifecycle. Used well, they can help traders and operators process information faster, spot patterns earlier, process information at scale, identify patterns earlier, and embed stronger governance across workflows. Yet while interest is high, tangible returns remain mixed. The gap is rarely about ambition or technology; it is about readiness.

This article explores what firms need in place to move beyond AI experimentation and translate investment into measurable business outcomes. Recent research from MIT, suggests that while organisations continue to increase the AI investment, relatively few have achieved significant business impact, highlighting the importance of readiness, integration and execution.

Why AI matters now

AI is increasingly applied across the trade lifecycle to improve how firms process information, make decisions, and operate at scale.

While use cases vary across organisation, most fall into four broad areas:

AI models can analyse vast datasets for prices, weather, shipping flows, outages, geopolitical events, and real-time news, to identify patterns and correlations that are difficult to detect consistently using traditional analysis.

AI-driven analytics and agents can support algorithmic and semi-automated trading strategies, as well as optimise decision-making across deal structuring, scheduling, and logistics.

AI can help surface and prioritise risks across market, credit, operational, and emerging ESG dimensions, supporting a more continuous and forward-looking risk view.

AI and GenAI can automate repetitive, low-value activities such as trade validation, reconciliations, document processing, contract readiness, and logistics coordination - freeing teams to focus on judgement-led decisions.

These capabilities translate into measurable outcomes, explored in the next article.

AI adoption in commodity trading is not linear

AI adoption is rarely linear. Progress is shaped by data availability, business priorities, and existing technology foundations. As a result, firms often operate at multiple levels of maturity simultaneously: some processes remain manual and heavily reliant on human expertise, while others already use advance analytics, machine learning, or GenAI.

The organisations achieving the strongest results are not focused on where they sit on AI maturity spectrum. Instead, they focus on three practical questions:

  1. Where is manual effort constraining scale or efficiency?
  2. Where is decision quality limited by data, speed, or visibility?
  3. Where can AI augment human judgement or strengthen control?

Firms that realise tangible returns focus on these pressure points, applying AI selectively where it delivers measurable impact, rather than progressing through predefined stages.

The foundation first: getting ready for AI

The three questions above help organisations identify where AI can help create value. However, answering those questions is only the starting point. To translate opportunities into measurable results, firms need the right foundation in place. The organisations seeing the greatest success typically focus on five areas:

A common early challenge is identifying which parts of the trade lifecycle genuinely benefit from automation or AI-driven insight, and which do not. Firms need clarity on where automation, AI agents, or GenAI can remove process bottlenecks and improve throughput, improve decision quality, or enhance control across front, middle, and back-office processes.

Many non-differentiating activities across the trade lifecycle can often be addressed with off-the-shelf solutions, delivering faster ROI (return on investment). Custom builds should be reserved for areas that provide competitive differentiation or rely on proprietary data and trading logic. Equally important is selecting the right AI model of each use case. Not every task requires the largest or the most capable model. Matching the model to the complexity of the problem helps organisations manage token consumption, improve response time, reduce cost, strengthen security, and minimise the risk of hallucinations – particularly as AI agents become embedded within operational workflows.

AI models are only as effective as the data supporting them. In many commodity trading organisations, critical data remains fragmented across ETRMs, market data providers, spreadsheets, emails, and third-party platforms. AI readiness requires breaking down data silos across the trade lifecycle, establishing strong data governance, and adopting scalable data architecture capable of supporting both real-time and batch-driven use cases. Rather than creating separate AI governance structures, organisations should build on existing data, technology, security, and risk governance frameworks, embedding AI oversight into established processes to maintain control without creating additional delivery bottlenecks.

Successful AI adoption is rarely a big-bang transformation. The most effective starting points are where human effort reaches natural limits of speed, volume, or complexity - particularly across trade execution, validation, and optimisation.

Technology alone does not deliver value - people do. AI initiatives must be business-led, with traders, operations, and risk professionals actively shaping and validating use cases. Firms also benefit from engaging with teams who understand what good looks like across the market and can help avoid common pitfalls.

Partnering for practical AI adoption

Moving from experimentation to production requires more than technology. Firms need a clear understanding of where value exists, which foundations require strengthening, and how AI can be embedded within existing operating models.

The organisations seeing the strongest results take a pragmatic approach-prioritising business outcomes, scaling successful use cases, and maintaining strong governance throughout adoption. In a market where speed, judgement, and control increasingly define competitive advantage, AI readiness is becoming less of a technology question and more of a strategic one.

Did you find this useful?

Thanks for your feedback