In the aftermath of a disaster, tax is the last thing anyone wants to be dealing with. Inland Revenue recognises this and has a range of tax relief measures for emergency events to ease the burden of filing and payments. This is great in the immediate aftermath of a disaster while everyone is transitioning from response to recovery. However, this only touches on the tip of the tax iceberg for businesses affected by significant adverse events, especially once an insurance claim is in the mix.
At a broad level, the tax principles for insurance receipts (or similar compensation) are relatively straightforward and should generally follow matching principles:
However, as we saw in the aftermath of the Canterbury Earthquakes when claims are broad-ranging and significant in size, and both the claim and recovery processes stretch over years, a number of issues can arise including:
Insurers often prefer their settlement agreements to be “global” and generally only document against the two main types of policies: Business Interruption and Material Damage (the broader the settlement scope, the less likely additional claims can be made). Often a material damage settlement will only state “for loss and damages at XYZ Street”. However, as highlighted above, for tax purposes we need to consider more discrete matters – often down to individual assets and activities – and where insurers and claimants have negotiated settlement values, excluded certain items, or applied claim excess deductions, the tax process becomes even more complicated.
To get to the correct tax answers, ultimately, we have to look into claim documents and correspondence, including reports from loss adjustors, assessors and engineers.