Towards greater alignment: Income Computation and Disclosure Standards and Indian Accounting Standards

Simplifying tax compliance through greater alignment between accounting and tax frameworks

Our report examines the differences between the two frameworks and identifies opportunities to simplify compliance, improve consistency and provide greater tax certainty.

Download the report

Towards a more consistent accounting and tax framework

ICDS was introduced to bring uniformity and certainty to the computation of taxable income, regardless of the accounting standards followed for financial reporting. However, differences between ICDS and Ind AS can require businesses to adjust accounting profits, maintain separate tax computations and reconcile differences in the treatment of income, expenses, assets and liabilities.

The proposed integration offers an opportunity to address these challenges. The report examines the gaps between the frameworks, their implications for taxpayers and where alignment is practical, while considering areas where distinct tax principles remain necessary.

Identifying opportunities for alignment

The report examines specific differences between ICDS and Ind AS

Recognition of gains

Differences in recognising unrealised mark-to-market gains and losses, and provisions for onerous contracts, can create gaps between accounting and taxable profits. The report explores the potential use of other comprehensive income (OCI) and appropriate tax disclosures to address these differences.

Find out more

Revenue recognition

ICDS and Ind AS differ in recognising revenue from construction contracts and the sale of goods. The report considers alignment with Ind AS 115, including its performance-obligation and transfer-of-control principles, with transitional provisions to prevent double taxation or omissions.

Find out more

Valuation of inventories

Differences in the treatment of duties and taxes under ICDS II and Ind AS 2 can result in variations in inventory valuation. Aligning the treatment of these costs, supported by suitable transition provisions, could improve consistency between accounting and tax reporting.

Find out more

Recognition of provisions

ICDS X requires a provision to be recognised when an obligation is “reasonably certain”, while Ind AS 37 uses a “probable” threshold. Aligning the recognition criteria, along with appropriate transition provisions, could reduce differences between accounting and tax treatment.

Find out more

Retaining clarity where tax treatment differs

Some differences stem from specific provisions of the Income-tax Act

Capitalization of borrowing costs

ICDS IX and Ind AS 23 prescribe different approaches to capitalising borrowing costs. Retaining the distinct tax treatment can help preserve consistency in tax computation while recognising the differences between accounting and tax requirements.

Find out more

Government grants

ICDS and Ind AS differ in the timing and measurement of government grants, particularly those received before recognition conditions are met and those relating to depreciable assets. The report identifies where existing tax provisions address these differences and where further clarification may be needed.

Find out more

Financial leases

The report identifies opportunities to improve tax certainty through explicit provisions or closer alignment with Ind AS, particularly for financial leases and deductions relating to employee stock option plans.

Find out more

Disclosures

Where accounting and tax treatments cannot be aligned, clear disclosures can help explain the resulting differences. The report includes illustrative disclosures for mark-to-market gains and losses, major inspection costs and provisions for onerous contracts.

Find out more