This page outlines country-level details about the onboarding process when hiring employees, and touches upon the applicable rules when terminating employment contracts.
The employer must present an employee with written information on the principal terms of work, unless the terms are laid down in a written employment contract. The information must include at least:
The information referred to in points 1 to 8 of the list above shall be provided no later than seven days after the commencement of work. The information referred to in paragraphs 9 to 15 shall be provided no later than one month after the commencement of work. The information referred to in point 16 shall be provided before the employee leaves abroad.
The employer is also required to notify the employee of any changes in the principal terms of work as soon as possible and in any case, no later than upon the change coming into force, unless the change is due to changes in law or the applicable collective bargaining agreement.
When hiring employees in Finland, employers also have various registration (e.g., tax and employer registration) and insurance-related obligations (e.g., obligation to take out mandatory pension and accident insurance) as well as health and safety related obligations (e.g., duty to organize occupational health care).
It is not required to establish a legal entity in Finland to hire someone.
The employer and the employee may agree on a probation period of a maximum of six months starting from the beginning of the work. If the employee has been absent during the probation period due to incapacity for work or family leave, the employer is entitled to extend the probation period by one month for every 30 calendar days included in the periods of incapacity for work or family leave. In a fixed-term employment relationship, the probation period and any extensions to it, may comprise no more than half of the duration of the employment contract, and in any event may not exceed six months. If an employee is hired by the client company after the end of a temporary agency employment relationship to the same or similar duties, the length of the probationary period shall be reduced by the time the employee was rented to the client company.
If a collective bargaining agreement applicable to the employer contains a provision on a probation period, the employer must inform the employee of the application of this provision at the time the contract is concluded.
During the probation period, the employment contract may be terminated with immediate effect by either party. The employment contract may not, however, be terminated on discriminatory or otherwise inappropriate grounds with regard to the purpose of the probation period.
Medical examination
An employee may not refuse to attend a medical examination without a good cause, if at the start or at a later stage of the employment the examination is necessary for:
The medical examination is performed by mutual agreement with the employee.
Criminal background check
Criminal background checks are permissible only for specific functions (e.g. positions involving working with children) and as specifically determined by law. Obtaining a criminal record extract mainly requires active initiation from an individual (i.e. the employee). The Finnish Security and Intelligence Service carries out security clearances (a wider check than criminal background check) for companies and authorities. A security clearance is only permissible when authorized by law and made with the written consent of the person subject to the clearance.
Reference and education checks
Reference and education checks are permissible with consent from the individual and provided that such information is necessary for the employment relationship.
According to Finnish law, an employer must treat all employees equally, unless deviating from this is justified in view of the duties and position of the employees. There are also provisions on equality and on the prohibition of discrimination (on several grounds, such as gender).
The two main categories of employment relationships in Finland are:
An employment contract is open-ended (permanent employment relationship) unless it has, for a justified reason, been made for a specific fixed term (fixed-term employment relationship). An example of a valid legal reason for a fixed-term employment relationship is the temporary nature of the work concerned. However, employment contracts made for a fixed term on the employer's initiative without a justified reason are considered open-ended. It is also prohibited to use consecutive fixed-term contracts when the number or total duration of the fixed-term contracts, or the totality of such contracts, indicate a permanent need of labor.
Entering into a fixed-term employment contract does not require a justified reason, if the person to be employed has, according to the notification of the employment authorities, been continuously unemployed and registered as a jobseeker for the previous 12 months. A period of employment lasting up to two weeks does not, however, interrupt the continuity of unemployment. The maximum duration of a fixed-term employment contract with a long-term unemployed person is one year. The contract may be renewed up to twice within one year from the start of the first fixed-term employment contract. However, the total combined duration of the contracts must not exceed one year.
It is to be noted that changes to the possibilities to enter into a fixed-term employment contracts are expected to enter into force on 1 January 2026. Under the draft proposal, the employer would be able to offer fixed-term contracts up to one year without a justified reason for first-time hires or if five years have passed since the last employment. Contracts could be renewed twice within that year, but total duration cannot exceed one year.
An employment contract (both open-ended and fixed-term contracts) may be oral, written or electronic. However, in case no written employment contract is available, certain information on the principal terms of work still has to be provided in writing (please see section A 1. above).
There is mainly one official category of executives under Finnish law whose rights deviate from the labor law rules applied to employees—managing directors (in Finnish: toimitusjohtaja). Managing directors are not regarded as employees (but company organs) in Finland and are thus not protected by the provisions of the Employment Contracts Act or other employment regulations, unless otherwise agreed. Therefore, it is common to draft a specific agreement to confirm the terms and conditions applicable to the position of the managing director. There are also some special provisions concerning executives relating to e.g. post-employment non-competition obligations and the applicability of the Working Hours Act.
There are no mandatory provisions on the language in which HR-related documents (such as employment contracts) must be drawn up in Finland. Finnish employment-related documents are normally drafted in an official language—Finnish or Swedish. However, other languages are also valid , but when determining which language to use, the decisive factor should be that the employee understands the content of the document(s) concerned.
Except for the general rules under the Act on Equality between Women and Men, Finland has no specific equal pay legislation enacted at the moment.
As a member of the European Union, Finland is, however, obliged to implement the EU Pay Transparency Directive by June 2026. In Finland, a working group preparing for the implementation of the Directive was established in May 2024. The working group’s draft proposal for amending the Act on Equality between Women and Men and certain other laws has been published on 16 May 2025 and is intended to be presented to the Parliament by week 51 of 2025. The proposed regulation will implement the Pay Transparency Directive. The proposed changes concern mainly information to be provided during recruitment, employees’ right to access information, the reporting obligation on pay disparities through the Incomes Register and the obligation to conduct joint pay assessments. The draft proposal is currently being circulated for comments. The new legislation is intended to enter into force on 18 May 2026.
There is no separate legislation on remote working, and for this reason, remote working is subject to employment legislation that is otherwise applicable to the employment relationship.
The employer may determine where remote work can be done. Remote work can be done either at the initiative of the employer or the employee, but neither party is obliged to agree to remote work (unless the employer´s decision is based on legal termination grounds, i.e. if the only alternative to remote work would be termination (e.g. in case the employer decides to give up his work premises all together)). As a rule, remote working does not change the rights and obligations of the employer and the employee, and thus, for example, the right to direct the work remains with the employer as in local work. The introduction and initiation of remote work does not necessarily require a separate agreement with an individual employee or the entire staff. The employer can also enable remote work with one-sided instructions, and in most cases this is the most appropriate way to enable remote work.
The employer is not obliged to purchase separate work equipment and furniture for remote working, at least in situations where the place of work specified in the employee's employment contract is the so-called work place (i.e. employer’s premises). It is sufficient that the employer provides the necessary tools and furniture, such as a desk and chair, for the place of work. There is no obligation to acquire these separately for the remote work place.
The instructions/policy on remote working should always be reviewed together with the personnel, and if the company regularly employs at least 20 employees, implementing remote work policy or changes to it may trigger obligations related to regular dialogue with the personnel and/or change consultations.
An open-ended employment contract can be terminated by the employer either on the basis of:
In both cases, the employer may not terminate an open-ended employment contract without proper and weighty reason.
Dismissal for reasons related to the individual requires a serious breach or neglect of obligations arising from the employment contract or law having material impact on the employment relationship. In addition, material changes in the employee’s capabilities necessary for working, resulting in the employee no longer being able to fulfil the work duties, can be considered a proper and weighty reason for dismissal. However, the number of employees employed by the employer as well as the employer's and the employee's overall circumstances must be taken into account when assessing the validity of the reason.
Dismissal for reasons related to the individual can take place either with a notice period (i.e., so-called ordinary dismissal) or with an immediate effect (i.e., so-called dismissal for serious cause− in Finnish: työsopimuksen purkaminen). A serious cause is such a grave breach related to the employment relationship that it would be regarded unreasonable to require the employer to continue the contractual relationship.
It is to be noted that changes to the grounds for dismissal on individual grounds are expected to enter into force on 1 January 2026. Under the draft proposal, if the dismissal is based on a breach or neglect of obligations arising from the employment contract or law that affect the employment relationship, the grounds for dismissal would be required to be proper as at present. However, the requirement for the grounds to be weighty would no longer apply. In addition, the warning procedure would be clarified by requiring that the employee must be informed of the substance of the warning when it is given, and that if the employee continues the conduct that led to issuance of the warning, this may affect the continuation of his or her employment. The government proposal is to be presented to the Parliament during the week 42.
A fixed-term employment contract ends automatically when the agreed term expires, without notice period. An employment contract for a definite period cannot be terminated during its term, unless the parties have specifically agreed so, or if there is an serious cause entitling the employer to terminate the contract with immediate effect, as referred to above. If the employer and employee continue to execute the employment relationship beyond its expiry date, the rules relating to an open-ended relationship will apply. Furthermore, a fixed-term employment contract for longer than five years may, after five years, be terminated on the same grounds and using the same procedure as an open-ended employment contract.
The termination of an employment contract always requires objective and justified (legal) reasons. Termination is subject to notice period (unless termination is executed with immediate effect).
As stated above, dismissal for reasons relating to the individual requires serious breach or negligence of obligations arising from the employment contract or law, having an essential impact on the employment relationship. In addition, material changes in the employee’s capabilities necessary for working may constitute a valid reason for dismissal. Employees who have neglected their duties arising from the employment relationship, or committed a breach thereof, must be warned and given a chance to amend their conduct before notice can be given. As an alternative to the dismissal, the employer must also consider e.g., whether the employee could be transferred to other duties.
Employment Contracts Act contains a list of reasons that cannot be considered as proper and weighty reasons for termination:
If the employee commits such a serious breach related to the employment relationship rendering it unreasonable for the employer to continue the employment relationship, the employment can be terminated without giving a warning or without investigating whether the employee could be transferred to other duties.
However, as mentioned above, changes to the grounds for dismissal on individual grounds are expected to enter into force on 1 January 2026. Under the proposal, in addition to the requirement of the termination reason being considered proper, the employer could terminate an open-ended employment contract on grounds relating to the employee’s person only for a valid reason that renders it unreasonable to expect the employer to continue the contractual relationship beyond the notice period. The proposal also contains a list of reasons that could be considered valid reasons for termination (such reasons include e.g. breach or neglect by the employee of obligations arising from the employment contract or law that affect the employment relationship, such as failure to comply with instructions given within the employer’s managerial rights, neglect of duties, unjustified absence, inappropriate behavior, and carelessness at work).
In addition, the employer´s obligation to investigate whether the dismissal could be avoided by placing the employee in another position would be limited to situations where the employee’s ability to perform their work has changed.
The employer must effect termination of the employment contract within a reasonable period after being informed of the existence of the dismissal grounds related to the employee. In addition, before the employer terminates an employment contract on reasons related to the individual, or terminates it with an immediate effect, the employer must provide the employee with an opportunity to be heard concerning the grounds for termination. While being heard, the employee is entitled to be assisted (e.g., by a shop steward/employee representative).
Dismissal with immediate effect is applicable only with serious cause relating to the individual (i.e., when a breach or negligence is made in such a manner that it is unreasonable to expect the employer to continue the contractual relationship, even for the period of notice). It should be noted that the right to revert to dismissal with immediate effect lapses if the employment contract is not terminated within 14 days from when the contracting party is informed of the existence of the immediate dismissal grounds.
Termination for financial and production-related or re-organizational reasons requires that the work to be offered has diminished substantially and permanently for financial or production-related reasons, or for reasons arising from reorganization of the employer’s operations (Please see section B 9. for further information). Termination for financial and production-related reasons requires a notice period.
The employer must inform the employee of the termination of the employment contract without delay by giving a notice.
The applicable notice periods of employment contracts/relationships are generally determined by law. If the employer is required to observe a collective bargaining agreement, the notice period of the collective bargaining agreement apply. The notice period can also be negotiated between the employer and the employee, unless otherwise regulated by the applicable collective bargaining agreement. However, the maximum length of the notice period is six months and the notice period of an employee may not be longer than the notice period of the employer.
Unless otherwise agreed, the notice periods to be observed by the employer are the following if the employment relationship has continuously lasted for:
|
Seniority |
Notice given by the employer |
|---|---|
|
≤ 1 year |
14 days |
|
1 ≤ 4 years |
1 month |
|
4 ≤ 8 years |
2 months |
|
8 ≤ 12 years |
4 months |
|
Over 12 years |
6 months |
Unless otherwise agreed, the notice periods to be observed by the employee are the following if the employment relationship has continuously lasted for:
|
Seniority |
Notice given by the employer |
|---|---|
|
≤ 5 years |
14 days |
|
Over 5 years |
1 month |
The employment continues throughout the notice period. Thus, the employee is entitled to the salary and other employment benefits during the course of employment until the end of the notice period. Finnish law does not recognize the concept of indemnity in lieu of notice, as an indemnity in lieu of notice is only possible with a separate and specific consent of an employee. Unless such consent exists, the employer pays the salary during the notice period on monthly basis.
There is no mandatory severance pay (eroraha) in Finland to be paid in addition to the notice period salary (and compensation for accrued but unused holidays).
Before dismissing an employee on individual grounds or terminating the employment on probation period or with immediate effect, the employer must provide the employee with an opportunity to be heard concerning the reasons for dismissal. While being heard, the employee is entitled to be assisted (e.g., by a shop steward/employee representative). (please also see section B 2. above).
The notice of termination should be delivered to the employee in person. If this is not possible, the notice may be delivered by letter or electronically. The notice in such situations is deemed to have been received by the recipient at the latest on the seventh day after the notice was sent.
The form of the notice is not stipulated by law, but for reasons of proof, a written form is highly recommended. In addition, termination reasons as well as termination date must be notified to the employee in writing at the employee’s request without delay.
Some categories of employees enjoy special statutory protection against dismissal if they are dismissed for reasons linked to their protected status. This concerns for example:
If the employer intentionally, or through negligence, commits a breach of obligations arising from the employment relationship or law, the employer is liable for the loss it caused the employee.
If the employer has terminated an employment contract contrary to the reasons laid down by law, the employer may be ordered to pay compensation for unjustified termination of the employment contract. The exclusive compensation must be equivalent to the pay due for a minimum of three months and a maximum of 24 months (a maximum of 30 months for shop stewards and elected representatives). In case of termination for financial or production related reasons and dismissal on probation period or with immediate effect, the abovementioned provision on minimum compensation shall not apply.
Furthermore, an employer who has deliberately or negligently failed to observe the co-operation provisions (provided the Co-operation Act applies) in connection with termination on financial and production-related reasons, may be ordered to pay each employee affected an indemnification amount of up to EUR 40 160.
There is mainly one official category of executives–managing directors−under Finnish law whose rights deviate from the labor law rules applied to employees.
Managing directors can be terminated at any time without any specific reason and there is no mandatory notice period to be applied by the parties. Therefore, it is common to agree on termination provisions in detail between the parties in the managing director agreement. A fairly common “termination protection package” of a managing director consists of a notice period between one and six months (for both parties) and a separate severance payment amounting to three to 24 months’ salary (payable in case the termination is not caused by any failure or breach of the managing director).
As stated above in section B 2., the employer may terminate the employment contract if the work to be offered has reduced substantially and permanently for financial or production-related reasons or for reasons arising from reorganization of the employer's operations. The reduction is usually considered temporary unless it clearly exceeds a period of 90 days. In addition, it is required that the employees affected cannot, within reason, be placed in or trained for alternative or other duties. No legal termination grounds are deemed to exist if the employer has, either before or after the termination (approximately one year), hired a new employee to similar duties without changes in its operating conditions, or if no actual reduction of work has occurred due to the reorganization.
The obligation to offer alternative work (equaling the employee’s work under the employment contract or, if no such work exists, equaling his/her education, professional skills or experience) covers all departments and offices of the employer entity (and also other entities in which the employer exercises control in personnel matters) and the employer is also required to provide the employee with reasonable training required by the new duties. This obligation is, in general, interpreted broadly and applies throughout the applicable notice period.
The employer has a re-employment obligation if the employer needs new employees to the same or similar duties that the employee made redundant was doing within four months from the termination of employment (six months if the employment has lasted at least for 12 years). It is to be noted, that changes to the re-employment obligation are expected to enter into force on 1 January 2026. Under the draft proposal, the re-employment obligation for employers with fewer than 50 employees would be removed, unless otherwise agreed upon in a collective bargaining agreement.
If the employer regularly employs at least 50 employees, the Co-operation Act applies, and subject to Act, the employer is required to conduct change consultation procedure prior to making any decisions on the terminations, temporary layoffs, making employment part-time, or unilateral changes in essential terms of employment on financial or production related or reorganizational grounds. Employers regularly employing 20-49 employees are required to conduct change consultation procedure if the employer is considering during a time period of 90 days terminating, reducing employments to part-time employments or unilateral changes to essential terms of employment of at least 20 employees or temporarily laying off at least 20 employees on financial or production related grounds. An employer regularly employing 20-49 employees is not required to conduct change consultation procedure if it is considering temporary lay-offs due to temporary diminishing of work to be offered. In case the employer regularly employs less than 20 employees, the consultation obligation is not applicable and the termination procedure is more straightforward.
If the employer is making at least 10 employments redundant, the employer furthermore has an obligation to notify the employment and economic development office. There are also additional obligations relating to making employees aged 55 or more redundant.
Nikolas Sjöberg
Finland
Nikolas.sjoberg@deloitte.fi | +358 44 750 5663