In this third article of our four-part series, we report on the views from the participants in the 2022 Global IFRS 17 Insurance Survey on how they will use the new IFRS 17 financial language to communicate to investors. With the focus on building sub-ledgers, introducing new charts of accounts, preparing data, and updating actuarial models, it is also sometimes easy with IFRS 17 to lose sight of the numbers themselves, and the story they tell about the performance of the underlying business.

Yet, IFRS 17 is fundamentally different and therefore difficult to compare against IFRS 4, the previous standard for insurance accounting, which was designed as a mere interim solution. “The numbers” are much more than just a new balance sheet and P&L with additional, detailed disclosures. The survey shows that two aspects really stand out in terms of understanding the new world of IFRS 17:

• The mixture of economic measurement and the smoothed release of profits over a policy’s lifetime and        
• The ongoing resetting each period of the insurance revenue to expected claims and expenses that could make the comparison of revenue and profit margins between lines of business more direct and understandable.

In this second article of a four-part series, the Economist Impact team focuses on the technology considerations of the survey. The effort expended on the technology needed for IFRS 17 compliance was often more than initially estimated, but the expected benefits also appear to be greater. As the survey revealed, a much more transparent and agile finance capability may now be possible because packaged software helps to capture new information and offers new analyses that were previously impossible.

IFRS 17 programs were often reported to be more complex, to take longer than expected, to cost more than planned and to require more broadly skilled resources. And these results did not vary much for different business scenarios. Data capture and analysis was a recurring theme as insurers found that the requirement for additional data granularity and governance was a primary consideration as they integrated and tested packaged solutions. The need to build foundational capabilities to tackle these challenges has created new opportunities to better report and manage financial and operational information.

In this first report of the survey findings, the Economist Impact team has focused on the responses we collected from participants based in the European Union (EU) given the EU-endorsed version of IFRS 17 has a key difference compared with the text originally published by the International

Accounting Standards Board. This difference is the addition of a voluntaryexemption from one key requirement in IFRS 17 that many stakeholders in the EU endorsement process believed should not apply on a mandatory basis to aparticular type of life insurance business commonly found in the EU.

The highlights from the survey are that a large majority of EU-headquartered insurance groups will choose the voluntary adoption of the EU exemption. The overwhelming sentiment indicated that this choice is not expected to significantly dilute the benefit of the level playing field that IFRS 17 could deliver globally. Participants in the survey also noted their plan to provide disclosure on the use of the EU exemption.

Under the sponsorship of Deloitte, the Economist Impact surveyed 360 insurance executives during May and June 2022 to gauge the final views of the global insurance industry on IFRS 17. This survey took place only a few months before the "go-live" date of IFRS 17 on 1 January 2023.

This statistical compendium reproduces the questions to the participants and the summary of the answers collected. The findings from this data are the foundation of the four reports that Deloitte has sponsored on this topic.

In this third article of our four-part series, we report on the views from the participants in the 2022 Global IFRS 17 Insurance Survey on how they will use the new IFRS 17 financial language to communicate to investors. With the focus on building sub-ledgers, introducing new charts of accounts, preparing data, and updating actuarial models, it is also sometimes easy with IFRS 17 to lose sight of the numbers themselves, and the story they tell about the performance of the underlying business.

Yet, IFRS 17 is fundamentally different and therefore difficult to compare against IFRS 4, the previous standard for insurance accounting, which was designed as a mere interim solution. “The numbers” are much more than just a new balance sheet and P&L with additional, detailed disclosures. The survey shows that two aspects really stand out in terms of understanding the new world of IFRS 17:

• The mixture of economic measurement and the smoothed release of profits over a policy’s lifetime and        

• The ongoing resetting each period of the insurance revenue to expected claims and expenses that could make the comparison of revenue and profit margins between lines of business more direct and understandable.