Across financial services organizations globally, is gender parity in the C-suite within reach? It could be—if many organizations prioritize advancement of women in leadership now.
Since 2019, the Deloitte Center for Financial Services has researched women’s progress in reaching financial services leadership in real terms: numbers and actions. Last year, we expanded our research to uncover what was happening in financial services organizations around the world. This year, our global study includes more than 68,000 financial services institutions (FSIs) across sectors in nearly 200 countries and territories.
This update focuses on the top jobs: How are women faring in ascending to the highest levels of leadership? How was this tracking with the share of women on FSI boards? And are organizations focusing enough on nurturing talent in the pipeline, talented women who could move into these leadership roles in the next few years?
Results are mixed. There has been progress across regions, but in most, it has been incremental. What’s more, if organizations continue to devote the current level of effort toward achieving gender equity among their leadership team, progress will likely slow or stagnate by 2031. Many organizations may need to take steps now to attract, develop, and retain women for top roles—and focus on their pipeline of senior leadership and next-generation leaders (manager or equivalent titles below senior leadership) to create tangible advancement paths within their organizations.
The number of women in financial services who reach to the highest levels of leadership—the C-suite and the board—is rising. Over the past decade, more women have been added to FSI C-suites than men. Women now account for 18% of C-suite positions globally (figure 1). Without a more concerted effort, global growth in the share of women financial leaders may not even reach 25% by 2031.
This growth mirrors progress in board gender diversity over the same time period, suggesting a synergistic relationship may exist between the two (figure 2). More women in the C-suite may help attract more women in the boardroom, and vice versa.1
The share of women in the C-suite has grown across regions, and this growth will likely continue (figure 3). The most progress among regions has been made in Oceania. In particular, Australia’s implementation of gender-equity measures at the government and employer levels continues to produce results. Many organizations in Australia have been making active efforts to place more women in the C-suite.2
In Europe, however, growth in women’s share of C-suite positions is expected to slow. In fact, there doesn’t appear to be much of a correlation between women on the board and women in the C-suite. Despite a high share of board seats (at 32%, the highest among all regions), women are relatively underrepresented at the C-suite (17%).3 Perhaps the European Union’s Women on Boards Directive will drive measurable gains in women in leadership roles and at board level by the June 2026 implementation target date.4
Our Within reach research also explores women’s share of traditional versus nontraditional roles among the C-suite. While actual role titles vary across institutions and geographies, traditional roles are those that typically report to the CEO or to the board, such as chief executive officer, chief financial officer, chief marketing officer, or chief operating officer. Roles classified as nontraditional or emerging are those that typically report to another C-level role or have been created over the last two decades, such as chief digital officer, chief diversity and inclusion officer, and chief sustainability officer.
Although still comparatively low, women occupying nontraditional C-suite positions are growing at a faster pace than those in traditional C-suite positions (figure 4). Over the last decade, the number of women in nontraditional C-suite roles grew twice as fast as those in traditional C-suite roles. In the past five years, this growth rate tripled.
Our Within reach research continues to explore if and when there is a multiplier effect in play: For each woman added to the C-suite, there’s a positive, quantifiable impact on the number of women in senior- leadership levels just below the C-suite. The multiplier effect continues to be observed on the organizational level in select countries.
The multiplier effect can be extremely powerful. Take Germany’s example (figure 5). An analysis of European countries revealed that Germany lags its regional counterparts on women’s representation across role categories. However, at the organizational level, it showcases the highest multiplier effect. Every woman added to the C-suite results in nearly four additional women among the senior-leadership ranks, suggesting that even one additional woman in a C-suite role can make a significant difference, especially when there’s a dearth of women role models.
But for the multiplier effect to be able to work, organizations should determine if they have enough talented women in senior-leadership and next-generation roles to benefit from it. Just below the C-suite are the women who could ascend to it: an organization’s talent pipeline. Women who are in senior- leadership roles are executives, such as line of business leaders, EVPs, SVPs, or regional leaders, that are one to three levels below the C-suite. Next- generation leaders are those just below them, typically those holding a title of manager or the equivalent.
Here, there is more cause for concern: At a global level, women’s representation in senior-leadership and next-generation roles has grown at a much slower pace than C-suite roles (figure 6). If the status quo continues, the share of women in senior-leadership roles could stagnate while that of next- generation roles is likely to fall by almost 2 percentage points by 2031. This should highlight the importance of gender-equity efforts and building a sustainable talent pipeline across organizations and geographies.
Regionally, South America is the only continent expected to witness growth, albeit off a low base, in women’s share of senior-leadership and next-generation roles.
Forecasts suggest Oceania, followed by Africa, will bear the biggest losses to women’s share of senior- leadership and next-generation roles by 2031, despite having the highest proportion of women in the C-suite (figure 7).
The needle of progress on gender equity continues to move incrementally. Years of small gains are at risk if meaningful action isn’t taken. We’ve developed a Within Reach framework of actions, CARE – Collect, Assess, Report, and Engage, that outlines a series of steps FSI leaders should consider to help enact change (figure 8).
Having a complete data picture can help organizations make informed decisions. But many organizations are only scratching the surface of what they could know: 23% of organizations surveyed in Deloitte’s 2023 Global Human Capital Trends “measure progress regarding diversity commitments through adherence to compliance standards—which may focus on activities instead of the impact of those activities.”5
Comprehensive data collection is an important step in achieving gender equity. However, some European countries prohibit diversity monitoring.6 Gathering diversity data and employee feedback through regular pulse checks can highlight blind spots and help identify programs and how they’re working, allowing organizations to concentrate their resources and efforts on where it matters most. Garnering employee trust is often crucial to the data-gathering process. To gain that trust, leaders can focus on being transparent about how the data will be used. This could also garner greater participation.
Assessing diversity data can help set measurable goals and create accountability. Only 32% of the largest US public companies conduct a gender pay-gap analysis. And only 14% of companies report the results, mostly when they are near or at parity.7
Here are three ways to help assess data:
Reporting diversity information—both internally and publicly—can help boost transparency and enhance trust.9 Yet, 24% of organizations surveyed in Deloitte’s 2023 Global Human Capital Trends study “are not establishing accountability or measuring progress in their equity commitments.”10 And a recent Harvard Business Review study showed that just 28% of companies hold C-suite executives accountable for progress against the organization’s DEI strategy.11
The majority of small- and medium-sized regulated US FSIs have little to no publicly available information on diversity and inclusion. In 2022, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) conducted an analysis of diversity and inclusion within financial services, where it found that 68% of 270 regulated FSIs have made little to no diversity and inclusion information available to the public.12When reporting, here are some practices financial services firm leaders can consider:
FSIs should engage within and outside the organization to achieve and show commitment to gender diversity. Ninety-two percent of respondents from Deloitte’s Women @ Work 2023: A Global Outlook believe their organization is not taking concrete steps to fulfill its commitment to gender diversity.13
Leaders can foster engagement, improve their reach of the desired talent pool, and help showcase organizational commitment by:
FSI leaders have an opportunity to play a pivotal role in helping create a more equitable world. Taking these actions now, at the organizational level, could collectively change the trajectory of women’s share in financial services firm leadership around the world. It could even make achieving gender equity a goal that’s truly within reach.
We studied historical data from 1998–2022 and forecast growth by region and roles through 2031. This research includes more than 68,000 financial services institutions (FSIs) across nearly 200 countries and territories representing: