Board members, senior executives, Chief Sustainability Officers, and those working on sustainability in financial services firms and corporates.
This summer has seen European Parliament elections and the re-election of Ursula von der Leyen as European Commission President. With the recent publication of von der Leyen’s Mission Letters to Executive Vice-President-designates and Commissioner-designates, we have assessed what these post-election changes are likely to mean for the sustainability agenda in the EU over the course of the next five-year mandate.
This note covers the following topics:
i. Recap on what has happened.
ii. What these changes are likely to mean for the EU sustainability agenda over the next five years.
iii. Key sustainability priorities set out in Ursula von der Leyen’s political guidelines and Mission Letters.
iv. What does this mean for corporates and financial services firms?
1. Pro-European centrist parties will continue to set the agenda on sustainability, but with increasing divergence and influence from parties critical of the Green Deal.
We anticipate that pro-European centrist parties will continue to set the agenda on sustainability. Nevertheless, achieving consensus between these parties will be challenging, with those on the left typically focused more on delivery of the Green Deal and just transition, and those on the right typically focused more on competitiveness and reducing the burden on business.
We expect increasing influence from the right, where the outcome of national elections are likely to have a bearing on EU policy and, within the European Parliament, the newly formed Patriots for Europe party is now the third largest party in the European Parliament. Based on the known views of the party’s members, it is likely to be highly critical of the Green Deal. However, so far, none of its MEPs hold Chair or Vice-Chair positions on European Parliament Committees.
2. We expect the key pillars of the sustainability agenda to remain in place and continued commitment to the European Green Deal.
The EU Climate Law, the Fit for 55 package introducing targets for Member States and certain industries, and other key pieces of legislation under the European Green Deal have already entered into force. In her political guidelines, Ursula von der Leyen has stated that “we must and will stay the course on the goals set out in the European Green Deal”.
Therefore, the goals and overarching sustainability strategy to 2030 and 2050 are established and unlikely to be unpicked. Von der Leyen also plans to press ahead with introducing in law a 90% GHG emissions reduction target for 2040, relative to 1990, expected early 2025. What we don’t know is how much resistance this may receive. Even legislation which has already entered into force, such as the EU Deforestation Regulation, is subject to calls for delay.
3. Continuation in policy, slowdown in the pace of legislation, and focus on implementation.
A significant amount of legislation under the European Green Deal was introduced under the previous European Parliament. Therefore, a slowdown in the pace of level one legislation was always anticipated and already underway prior to the elections.
While there are new sustainability policy proposals in Ursula von der Leyen’s political guidelines and Mission Letters (see below) and there is more legislation still to come under the European Green Deal, Ursula von der Leyen’s political guidelines largely set out a continuation in policy approach and a focus on implementation and investment.
As the practical realities of implementation become more apparent, how Member States and companies do so and the consequences of poor progress against targets or poor compliance, will be a key test of EU ambition on sustainability. It is notable that in von der Leyen’s Mission Letters she tasks each Executive Vice-President-designate and Commissioner-designate with preparing an annual progress report on enforcement and implementation.
Another key test will be whether the required funding will be forthcoming. In the Draghi reports, the investment needs are described as “massive and unprecedented from a historical perspective.” Achieving the energy transition makes up more than half of the 750 to EUR 800 billion minimum annual additional investment needed to meet the objectives in the report (based on Commission estimates).
4. EU competitiveness
EU priorities have shifted since the last elections in 2019. In her speech to the European Parliament, Ursula von der Leyen emphasised competitiveness as her “first priority”. The European Council’s Strategic Agenda has achieving a “prosperous and competitive” EU as a key priority. Security and defence, democracy and social fairness, and the cost of living will also feature highly in the future EU agenda. Sustainability still maintains high importance but is increasingly being seen as a means to support EU competitiveness and energy security, rather than as an end in itself.
Rather than key new sustainability legislation, we will increasingly see sustainability embedded across legislation and responsibilities related to sustainability embedded across the Commission. Each Executive Vice-President-designate and Commissioner-designate has responsibilities in relation to achieving the EU’s climate objectives and delivering the European Green Deal, and 19 out of 26 of them have specific responsibilities related to the sustainability agenda. Ensuring coordination within the Commission will be important for the EU to make progress on its sustainability agenda.
While initiatives on nature and just transition are planned, the focus in the political guidelines is on clean and affordable energy and the finance and investment required to achieve it.
In its expected legislative reviews, level two legislation, and guidance, we may see a reduction in ambition on climate as the EU seeks to pursue its other priorities, such as competitiveness. For example, as part of the review of the 2035 phase-out of Internal Combustion Engines cars or vans, a targeted amendment is expected, aimed at ensuring a technology-neutral approach in which e-fuels have a role to play.
5. Reducing the burden on business
As part of the competitiveness agenda, we expect increasing emphasis on reducing the burden on business and supporting business, particularly SMEs, in the transition.
In her Mission Letters, Ursula von der Leyen has given each Executive Vice-President-Designate and Commissioner-designate a responsibility to “table proposals to eliminate any overlaps and contradictions” in EU legislation, ensure “existing rules are fit-for-purpose and focus on reducing administrative burdens and simplifying legislation”, and “contribute to reducing reporting obligations by at least 25% - and for SMEs at least 35%.”
While the Mission Letters do not specifically refer to sustainability legislation, the Draghi reports referenced the EU’s sustainability reporting and due diligence framework as a “major source of regulatory burden”. Therefore, we anticipate that the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD), EU Taxonomy, and Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD) will be key pieces of legislation where the EU will look to enhance usability.
The International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB) is positioned as the global standard setter on sustainability reporting, taking over various responsibilities in relation to work by the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD), the UK’s Transition Plan Taskforce, and the Taskforce on Nature-related Financial Disclosures (TNFD). As the EU looks to increase interoperability, as it did with its May 2024 ESRS-ISSB interoperability guidance, its future legislation and guidance is likely to be influenced, to some extent, on what the ISSB and other international organisations do.
Overall, we anticipate considerable continuity in policy over the next five years, with continued focus on the European Green Deal and achieving sustainability targets. Firms should use the anticipated slowdown in level one legislation to focus on implementation.
We also anticipate focus on climate and sustainability by European supervisors and other authorities, such as the European Central Bank (ECB), European Supervisory Authorities (ESAs), and European Financial Reporting Advisory Group (EFRAG), to continue, and, in some cases, intensify, especially in the event of increasing transition risks and extreme weather events.
It will be several months before we understand in detail the priorities of the new Commission. As part of regulatory horizon scanning, firms should track expected new legislation, legislative reviews, level two legislation, and guidance. They should understand the impact on their firm’s operations and strategy and where there might be uncertainties.
Firms should identify opportunities that may arise from the EU’s focus on competitiveness, investment, and transition finance. They should also monitor market developments, including in technology necessary for the transition, which we expect will increasingly be driven more by market dynamics and less by regulation.
Ultimately, we believe that sustainability will remain a key priority for corporates and financial services firms and there should be no slowdown in progressing transition planning to meet sustainability targets and enhancing risk management.