Impacts of Critical Entities Directive (CER) and Strategies for Effective Preparedness
The CER aims to improve and harmonize Member States’ and organizations’ resilience strategies and plans. Unlike certain regulations that impose direct obligations on individual entities, CER serves as a foundational framework that EU Member States must adapt into their national laws, thereby tailoring specific enforceable requirements to their context.
CER Directive Core Priorities
The CER serves as a framework of recommendations and measures designed to strengthen the resilience of identified critical entities, safeguarding essential services across the EU, and improving the functioning of the internal market. Adhering to the guidelines set forth by the European institutions is essential for enhancing security, building trust, ensuring regulatory compliance, and maintaining a strong reputation and competitiveness. The CER directive emphasizes three principal focus areas:
To meet these objectives, EU Member States must develop and implement a national strategy to enhance the resilience of critical entities. Entities covered by the strategy will be required to conduct risk assessments at least once every four years, identify risks that could significantly disrupt service delivery, implement appropriate measures to strengthen their resilience, and report incidents that impact their resilience to the relevant authorities.
Critical Organizations and Infrastructures Across Essential Sectors in EU Member States
The CER directive concerns entities identified as critical within the Member States of the European Union. These are organizations and infrastructures that provide essential services crucial to the functioning of society and the economy. Each Member State is tasked with the responsibility to define and compile a list of such critical entities by July 2026. The directive encompasses various sectors that underpin the operational framework of the EU's internal market, including but not limited to:
Organizations likely to be deemed a ‘critical entity’ should take action proactively to anticipate the requirements.
Comparison with NIS2 and DORA requirements
Both the NIS2 directive and the DORA regulation share several common objectives with CER, particularly in terms of enhancing resilience and improving the security of critical sectors. While CER covers a broad range of industries, NIS2 also applies to many of these sectors, such as transport, energy, healthcare, and public administration. NIS2's focus is on strengthening the cybersecurity of network and information systems, emphasizing national cybersecurity strategies, risk assessments, incident response, and the protection of digital infrastructures. Both CER and NIS2 promote resilience strategies and national frameworks, but NIS2 places a distinct emphasis on cybersecurity risk management, providing more detailed provisions for IT security, including encryption, vulnerability management, and cyber crisis frameworks.
DORA, in comparison, is a directly applicable and sector-specific regulation, targeting banking, financial market infrastructures, and digital infrastructure. While CER and NIS2 are broader in scope, DORA concentrates on ICT risk management in the financial sector, with specific requirements for incident reporting, third-party risk management, and digital operational resilience testing. DORA aligns with CER in its goal to enhance resilience, particularly in the context of operational and business continuity, but it is more focused on the technological and digital aspects of resilience in the financial industry.
Our team of experienced professionals is ready to provide a comprehensive range of services to address your needs, from initial gap analysis to strategic advisory and implementation support.