Skip to main content

Laura Bryce

United States

Derek Pankratz

United States

David R. Novak

United States

An organization is only as resilient as its people. As weather shifts grow more frequent and severe,1 companies should be attuned to how those events impact all aspects of their business, including facilities, infrastructure, supply chains, and what’s often their most valuable asset—employees.2 And those impacts aren’t confined to when an employee is on the clock. Workforce resilience is a core operational concern for nearly every company. Absenteeism during extreme events, degraded performance during heat waves, and uneven recovery after disruptions can undermine continuity plans that are built around assets and suppliers alone.

Deloitte’s survey of individuals’ sustainability-related experiences across nearly 20 countries indicates that direct experience with a variety of weather events is pervasive and, in some regions and among some cohorts, becoming increasingly common.3 Globally, 66% of respondents said they had experienced one or more extreme weather events in the last six months. More than half of the respondents reported living through extreme heat. Weather-related disruption is often a frequent condition shaping day-to-day workforce and household dynamics.

Weather events are disruptive for many workers

For many respondents, significant weather events are more than just mild inconveniences, disrupting their daily lives and creating a variety of hardships that in turn impact companies. Of those who experienced extreme weather recently, 22% said it caused them to miss work or school, jumping to 35% among those ages 18 to 34. Among all respondents, 31% said extreme weather had disrupted transportation, 30% said it had caused health issues, and 29% said it had created financial hardship. An additional 18% experienced damage to their property or vehicle, and 14% had to evacuate or shelter-in-place. For employers, these impacts extend beyond missed shifts: Health issues and financial stress can impact productivity4 and work quality.5

Many respondents are taking steps to shore up their resilience

Fifty-four percent of people across 17 countries now report taking steps to increase their personal and household resilience in the face of weather and challenging environmental conditions. Lower-cost steps to increase general preparedness were the most common: Twenty-nine percent of respondents globally said they’d stocked non-perishable food and other supplies in the past six months, and 25% reported purchasing other emergency supplies like flashlights or first aid kits. In the wake of the third-hottest summer on record in the Northern Hemisphere,6 more than 1 in 5 respondents said they’d recently invested in heating, ventilation, and air conditioning upgrades. Working-age respondents (those over the age of 18) were significantly more likely to say they had taken steps to bolster their personal resilience compared to participants from other age groups (figure 4).

That respondents are making these investments independently is instructive, suggesting heightened risk perception and an implicit transfer of adaptation costs from systems and institutions to individuals. For companies, this raises a strategic question: To what extent should workforce resilience be part of a company’s enterprise risk management and human capital strategy?

Implications for business resilience

As weather events increase in frequency and volatility, organizations that fail to account for household-level impacts on workers may systematically underestimate their exposure. To begin integrating workforce considerations into operational resilience planning, leaders can start by asking questions such as:

  • Where are we vulnerable to business continuity interruptions? Which roles, sites, and teams are most vulnerable to weather-related impacts and absenteeism due to transportation, caregiving, or infrastructure disruption? How effective are contingency plans when multiple employees or groups are affected simultaneously?
  • Where could we offer specific support? What measures are in place to help workers cope with heat stress, poor air quality, and other environmental stressors? Where could modest interventions—such as flexible scheduling, cooling support, backup power stipends, emergency leave, or transit assistance—meaningfully reduce productivity loss and employee strain during peak events?
  • How are we managing exposure and retention across the organization? How do impacts intersect with income, age, and role, and what does that mean for retention, engagement, and long-term talent risk?

The frequency and severity of extreme weather are likely to increase in the years ahead.7 By recognizing it as a workforce issue impacting personal and operational resilience, organizations can better align investments with the realities that employees and the business face. In doing so, organizations not only protect operational performance, but also build a more adaptive, loyal, and resilient workforce in the face of growing climatic uncertainty.

Methodology

Twice a year, Deloitte surveys roughly 20,000 respondents in approximately 20 countries to explore how environmental awareness and related behaviors are evolving worldwide. The Sustainability Signals survey—which is part of a broader survey on consumers’ intentions and behaviors—includes three focus areas: sustainability attitudes and beliefs, personal choices, and workplace engagement. The results can help leaders track how attitudes about the environment and sustainability are affecting daily lives, yielding important signals about how consumers, employees, and communities are changing over time.

Continue the conversation

Meet the industry leader

Laura Bryce

Managing Director, Deloitte Consulting LLP

By

Laura Bryce

United States

Derek Pankratz

United States

David R. Novak

United States

Endnotes

  1. Climate Central, “2025 in review: U.S. billion-dollar disasters,” Jan. 8, 2026.

  2. Talia Varley, “The hidden costs of climate change on the workforce,” Harvard Business Review, July 29, 2024.

  3. Deloitte surveyed nationally representative samples of 1,000 respondents each in 17 countries in September 2025.

  4. Todd Hollingshead, “Poor employee health means slacking on the job, business losses,” Brigham Young University College of Public Health, Feb. 6, 2018

  5. Babak Mammadov and Avishek Bhandari, “Stressed about money: The effect of employee financial pressure on financial reporting outcomes,” Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 42, no. 1 (2020): pp. 155–181.

  6. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Centers for Environmental Information, “Global climate report: August 2025,” September 2025.

  7. National Aeronautics and Space Administration, “Extreme weather and climate change,” accessed March 10, 2026.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Aditi Vashishtha for her contributions to the data analysis and development of this article.

Editorial (including production and copyediting): Elizabeth Ryan, Prodyut Borah, Sayanika Bordoloi, Pubali Dey

Design: Molly Piersol and Harry Wedel

Cover image by: Meena Sonar

Knowledge Services: Agni Wagh

Copyright