In today’s data-driven world, government organizations generate vast amounts of data and increasingly rely on it to create information products—such as reports, dashboards, and data visualizations—that enable them to better compete, innovate, and improve operations. However, without the right direction, guidance, policies, processes, standards, and structure in place, these information products can quickly overwhelm an organization and become a source of confusion, inefficiency, lost potential, and risk, ultimately undermining their value.
To avoid such a scenario and unlock the true value of organizational data, a coordinated effort led by chief data officers (CDOs) is essential. CDOs must advocate for appropriate authority, organizational structures, and budgets that position them to effectively manage data as a strategic asset, maximizing its usage and mission value. When empowered, CDOs can establish and enforce an accountability framework of policies, standards, and procedures to promote data quality, accuracy, availability, and security—a process known as data governance.
In Deloitte’s 2023 Federal CDO Survey, 85% of respondents identified data governance as a top mission priority, and it remains one of the top three focus areas in a recent follow-up survey.1 Despite this prioritization, 57% of respondents reported that they are still struggling to mature data governance within their organizations.
Implementing an agencywide data standard is not an easy feat, nor is it something a CDO can do alone. Data governance requires a collaborative, cross-functional approach that engages the entire organization. This creates the need to establish a data governance body—a formal group empowered to develop, oversee, and improve data management practices throughout the organization—thereby supporting its strategic priorities.
As directed in Title II of the 2018 Evidence Act,2 and further emphasized in the 2025 Phase 2 Implementation of the Evidence Act,3 US federal departments and agencies are required to establish data governance bodies to improve data management practices.
Effective data governance bodies provide a coordinated structure to oversee the management of data throughout its lifecycle. These groups are established by the CDO, with active participation from data stewards, data owners, and business leaders responsible for specific data domains such as policy, finance, human resources, information technology, and cybersecurity (figure 1).
The work of a data governance body spans three key levels:
When aligned with strategic priorities, governance bodies can empower agencies to advance their unique mission objectives. These objectives may include enhancing public safety and national security, safeguarding public health, or supporting safe and efficient transportation systems.
A data governance body brings together executive, tactical, and operational teams to ensure accurate data is readily available. With a shared goal of responsible data management aligned with mission and strategic business priorities, organizations can make data-driven decisions that deliver value quickly and improve mission success.
A well-supported data governance body is characterized by early and ongoing stakeholder engagement, strong executive advocacy, and clear alignment with business priorities. Such bodies foster a data-driven culture in which members’ voices are heard and their work is actively supported. CDOs and governance leaders set the vision, establish formal charters, and champion efficient data management as a shared enterprise responsibility, maximizing value, credibility, and return on investment.
Establishing a data governance body is a critical step in managing organizational data, but it often encounters resistance because it involves cultural and operational changes that are not always welcomed.
In the 2024 Federal CDO Survey, CDOs emphasized the need for data governance that extends beyond the scope of their own offices, frequently citing this as a barrier to achieving the goal of establishing a data-informed organization.
Data governance necessitates cooperation and participation across departments that often have distinct priorities, cultures, and established processes. As a result, implementing data governance can be seen as burdensome or even threatening if its value is not immediately clear to all participants and stakeholders, or if it lacks active endorsement and support from executive sponsors.
Senior leaders who are part of the committee or council often do not fully understand their role in data governance, nor why their involvement is necessary given their already limited bandwidth. Furthermore, they may showcase resistance due to perceived increased oversight and loss of autonomy. Leadership may also be concerned about losing ownership of work or data as roles and responsibilities become more defined and standardized through data governance.
A hurdle that CDOs face when establishing a data governance body is one that has persisted for many years: Historically, data leaders have had limited access to resources, a problem especially pronounced for federal CDOs.
Limited resources—be it budget, personnel, time, or technology—can significantly hinder the effectiveness and sustainability of data governance. Without sufficient funding or staff, launching data governance and establishing the necessary frameworks, policies, and tools can be slow, incomplete, or inconsistent.
If a CDO does manage to successfully set up a governing body, limited resources will likely restrict the scope of work the committee or council can tackle. They may be forced to direct resources toward “keeping the lights on” or focus solely on compliance and the most critical data assets. This leaves other data and important areas of work unmanaged, increases risk, and ultimately limits the governing body’s ability to achieve organizational goals and deliver on its mission.
Additionally, insufficient funding affects data leaders’ ability to hire the experienced talent needed to manage the growing workload associated with data management and modernization. As a result, data governance leaders are often compelled to be hands-on in daily data operations rather than providing strategic direction, leading to a reactive committee rather than a proactive one.
Data governance is the foundation of efficient data use, and establishing a supported governance body is essential for unlocking sustained business value.
Stakeholder engagement, strong leadership, and a well-defined strategy provide organizations with the structure and direction needed to transform ordinary data into a powerful driver of enterprise success.
As data volumes continue to grow and resources become increasingly limited, organizations need to embrace automation and AI to strengthen governance efforts. Although people remain central—championing culture, setting priorities, and upholding team accountability—AI-enabled data management can help overcome resource constraints, improve data quality, and increase user productivity, allowing participating members to focus their efforts on high-priority strategic initiatives where they can deliver greater mission impact.
Data governance bodies play a crucial role in providing leadership, accountability, and coordination. Data governance has evolved beyond a set of policies to become active and effective practices that deliver value throughout the organization. By uniting strong leadership, clear strategies, and AI-enabled tools, organizations can future-proof their data governance, consistently deliver value, and accelerate mission success.