Skip to main content
Welcome to Deloitte

If we have selected the wrong experience for you, please change it above.

From reactive response to scalable operational intelligence

Helping a leading oil and gas company develop a satellite-enabled remote sensing platform for methane detection

Introduction

Methane detection is no longer only an environmental reporting issue. For oil and gas companies, it sits at the intersection of safety, asset reliability, regulatory confidence, and long-term market access. As a highly flammable greenhouse gas, undetected leaks can drive safety incidents, operational disruption, product loss, and increasing scrutiny from regulators and investors.

For one leading oil and gas company in Southeast Asia, conventional approaches – including fixed-point sensors, handheld detectors, and manual inspections – provided important safeguards but were not designed to deliver continuous, scalable visibility across a large and dispersed operating footprint.

Deloitte worked with the company to develop and test a proof of concept (POC) for an artificial intelligence (AI)-powered remote sensing platform integrating satellite and non-satellite data. The POC demonstrated how combining data sources can expand detection coverage, reduce blind spots, and create a practical pathway from site-level monitoring to scalable emissions and safety intelligence.

The business challenge

The crux of the challenge was the need to not only improve the speed and accuracy of methane leak detection, reduce safety and reputational risks, and strengthen operational efficiency – but also do so without creating a model that would be too costly or complex for the client to scale.

Several dimensions further underpinned this challenge:

  • Coverage and speed: Existing manual inspections and point sensors left blind spots and were inherently reactive, with detection dependent on gas reaching a sensor or inspections occurring after the event
  • Fragmentation: Detection systems, field data, and external inputs operated in silos, limiting integrated and timely decision-making
  • Scalability and cost: Expanding dense sensor coverage across dispersed sites was financially and operationally difficult
  • Measurement and adoption: High emissions uncertainty reduced decision usefulness; to drive real operational impact, the solution must be embedded into workflows

What was needed, therefore, was not just another detection tool, but a scalable operating model for methane visibility – one that would combine remote sensing, ground-based validation, analytics, and workflow integration.

Deloitte's solution

Deloitte developed a methane detection platform POC to leverage and combine satellite data, ground-based sources, AI-enabled analytics, and geospatial visualisation. The objective was to integrate multiple data streams into a scalable platform to enable the identification, quantification, and prioritisation of flammable gas leaks. This POC comprised three core components:

Operational intelligence is not driven by data alone, but also the effective integration of technology, validation, workflows, governance, and site adoption.

Deloitte’s approach

Briefly, Deloitte’s approach to this solution development was grounded in a set of core design principles required to scale methane detection from POC to operational capability:

  • Adopt a hybrid detection model: Satellite data provides wide-area visibility, but constraints such as cloud cover, sun angle, and revisit cycles require complementary ground-based detection to ensure continuity and reliability
  • Design for integration from the outset: Combining multiple satellite sources with existing detection systems demands deliberate calibration, cross-validation, and a unified data architecture
  • Embed detection into operations: Detection only creates value when translated into action – requiring integration into site workflows, inspection routines, and decision-making processes
  • Prioritise data and infrastructure readiness: Cloud-enabled platforms, access to ground truth data, and evolving infrastructure are critical to improving detection accuracy and scalability over time
  • Operate with probabilistic confidence: Methane detection is inherently influenced by atmospheric complexity, requiring decisions to be based on confidence levels rather than absolute certainty

The solution

Deloitte developed a methane detection platform POC to leverage and combine satellite data, ground-based sources, AI-enabled analytics, and geospatial visualisation. The objective was to integrate multiple data streams into a scalable platform to enable the identification, quantification, and prioritisation of flammable gas leaks.

This POC comprised three core components:

  1. Satellite-powered methane detection: A range of hyperspectral satellite sources was assessed to build a broader detection window. Geospatial and analytical tools were used to process data, supporting methane plume detection, spatial analysis, and anomaly identification, while accounting for constraints such as revisit cycles and weather conditions.
  2. Integrated detection and validation: Recognising the limits of satellite-only monitoring, the solution combined satellite observations with ground-based sources, existing fire and gas detection systems, and site inputs. This complementary model helped address coverage gaps and enabled more operationally relevant detection.
  3. Insights orchestration for decision-making: The platform translated detection into action through visualisation, spatio-temporal analysis, and anomaly trending. Outputs were designed to integrate into operational tools, helping teams prioritise inspections, support maintenance, and manage risk more proactively.

This POC established a scalable methane detection platform that can be continuously extended across assets and new data sources, and embedded into operational workflows.

Outcomes

Ultimately, by combining satellite and ground-based data with AI-enabled analytics, the platform expanded detection coverage, reduced blind spots, and improved the client’s ability to identify and prioritise potential methane leaks.

Specifically, it enabled the following shifts:

  1. From 5-8% spatial coverage per inspection shift to 100% spatial coverage with 24/7 automated monitoring
  2. From reactive detection with 48-96-hour lag to earlier anomaly identification in less than two hours through multi-source data integration
  3. From emissions management with 50-200% uncertainty to less than 30% uncertainty
  4. From fragmented, siloed detection systems to a unified view across satellite, ground-based, and operational data
  5. From manual, labour-intensive inspections to more targeted, insight-led intervention

 

 

Did you find this useful?

Thanks for your feedback