In addition to the above, the tax qualification rules for a mutual fund (Fonds voor Gemene Rekening, “FGR”) will also be amended as of 1 January 2025. Under the new qualification rules, the definition of a mutual fund will be aligned with the concepts of investment fund and fund for collective investment in transferable securities under the Dutch Financial Supervision Act (Wet financieel toezicht, “WFT”). Based on guidance provided by the Dutch Ministry of Finance, this means that a mutual fund will only be considered tax-non transparent from a Dutch perspective if it qualifies as a regulated collective investment fund under the WFT and the participations are freely transferable, i.e. transferable other than by way of repurchase by the mutual fund itself. For non-Dutch EU funds the Dutch Tax Authorities appear to take the position that they should not qualify under the Dutch WFT, but as AIF or UCITS under the local implementation of the AIFMD or UCITSD. Still more guidance from the Dutch Ministry of Finance and/or the Dutch Tax Authorities on the qualification of foreign funds under these new rules is expected before the end of 2024.
Priority rule
With the new legislative framework, partnerships will generally be considered transparent. However, this does not apply if they qualify as a mutual fund. This is because the legislative change introduces a priority rule, meaning that if a foreign entity qualifies both as a mutual fund and as a partnership, it will be treated as a mutual fund. This rule ensures that mutual funds qualification takes precedence over the qualification of the legal form. In general, and as mentioned above, a partnership will be considered a mutual fund if the entity is a collective investment fund as defined in the WFT. In addition, the rights of participation must be tradable (which is not the case when transfer is only allowed back to the mutual fund itself, the so-called inkoopvariant).
Because of the new legislation, foreign partnerships that qualify as a mutual fund will be treated as such, irrespective of the qualification of their legal form. This means that such foreign partnerships may possibly remain non-transparent for Dutch tax purposes from 1 January 2025 onwards. Alternatively, it is also possible that a foreign legal form that is transparent in 2024, because it is comparable to a tax transparent Dutch limited partnership, may become non-transparent in 2025 if it qualifies as a Dutch mutual fund (FGR) under the new set of rules.
We recommend to review the current structure of entities that may be affected by these changes and to assess the impact of the new rules. Specific attention should be given to whether those entities meet the Dutch mutual fund criteria and how the priority rule will affect them. In this context we note the introduction of a transitional rule. This, in short, entails that a mutual fund is deemed to be a fund with a redemption mechanism (the earlier mentioned “inkoopvariant”) with effect from 1 January 2025, if there was already an intention to restructure before that date and the fund meets the condition for being a redemption fund by 31 December 2025.