Skip to main content

EU ETS: Potential tax implications for Dutch shipping companies

National and International tax alerts

The European Union Emissions Trading System (EU ETS) has been a cornerstone of the EU's strategy to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. As of January 2024, the EU ETS was extended to include the maritime sector, requiring shipping companies operating in European waters to comply with new CO2 emissions regulations. This expansion presents significant challenges for the industry, particularly regarding compliance and potential tax implications within the Dutch fiscal framework.

This tax alert provides an overview of the EU ETS, explains the conditions under which shipping companies will fall within its scope, and outlines the potential tax implications, with a focus on the Dutch tax system. Additionally, in this tax alert we will examine the potential effects of employing various procurement strategies, such as hedging, on a company's tax position.

Understanding the EU emissions trading system (EU ETS)

 

The EU ETS is a "cap-and-trade" mechanism that establishes a cap on the total amount of greenhouse gases that entities within its scope can emit. Companies can receive or purchase emission allowances, granting the right to emit one tonne of CO2 or an equivalent amount of other greenhouse gases. These emission allowances can be traded on the open market, providing financial incentives for companies to reduce their emissions.


The inclusion of the maritime sector in the EU ETS means that shipping companies are required to purchase and surrender allowances to cover their CO2 emissions for voyages within the European Economic Area (EEA). This represents a significant regulatory change, as shipping has traditionally been excluded from the EU ETS.


The first allowance surrender deadline: Shipping companies will need to surrender their first batch of EU allowances by April 30, 2025, to cover 40% of their verified CO2 emissions for the year 2024. This marks a crucial milestone for compliance and requires companies to prepare well in advance to manage their allowances and ensure they meet this deadline.


Which shipping companies are affected?


Shipping companies will be subject to the EU ETS if they meet the following criteria:

  • Vessel size and type: The regulations apply to ships of 5,000 gross tonnage or more that transport goods or passengers for commercial purposes, such as tankers, bulk carriers, container ships, and cruise ships.
  • Geographical scope: Emissions from voyages between ports within the EEA, as well as voyages departing from or arriving at an EEA port, are covered. For voyages between EEA ports, 100% of emissions are covered, for voyages departing an EEA port for a port outside the EEA or arriving from a port outside the EEA, only 50% of emissions are covered.
  • Compliance timelines: The obligation to purchase and surrender allowances will be phased in starting 2024, with an initial requirement to cover 40% of emissions from voyages under the EU ETS in 2024, rising to 70% in 2025 and 100% by 2026.

Potential tax implications for Dutch shipping companies


The inclusion of the shipping sector in the EU ETS brings several potential tax implications, particularly in the context of Dutch tax law. Here are the key considerations, along with examples to illustrate potential impacts:

Under Dutch law, transactions involving the purchase and sale of emission allowances are generally considered to be a taxable supply for VAT purposes. The VAT Directive offers Member States the possibility to subject supplies of emission allowances to the VAT reverse charged mechanism, in which case the VAT is due by the buyer of the emission allowances. This option has been implemented in the Netherlands.


For shipping companies operating within and outside the Netherlands, potential VAT implications and VAT reporting obligations should be reviewed carefully. For instance, a (foreign branch of a) Dutch shipping company purchasing emission allowances on the EU market may face VAT obligations depending on the seller's location and the transaction's structure, and it may vary by country whether the VAT reverse charge mechanism is applicable. Proper VAT registration, documentation, and compliance measures are required to ensure that the shipping company is considered compliant with these rules.
 

In the Netherlands, the costs associated with purchasing emission allowances may affect the corporate tax base. Typically, these costs can be deducted as business expenses, reducing the taxable profit of the company. However, the deductibility of these costs could depend on the nature of the expense and the specific facts and circumstances.


For example, a Dutch shipping company that purchases allowances to cover its emissions for EEA voyages can generally deduct these costs from its taxable income. However, if the allowances are bought for speculative purposes or held as investments, the deductibility may be restricted or subject to different rules. Companies should carefully evaluate the nature of their allowance transactions to determine the appropriate tax treatment.


Some shipping companies may also employ specific procurement strategies, such as hedging, to manage the financial risk associated with fluctuating prices of emission allowances. Hedging involves entering into financial contracts to lock in prices for future purchases, which can stabilize costs but also introduce additional tax complexities. For example, gains or losses from hedging transactions may be subject to different tax rules than the underlying allowance transactions. If these hedging contracts are managed centrally by a Dutch entity for other group entities, further transfer pricing implications may arise.

If a shipping company establishes a central entity within the group, such as a Dutch entity, to handle the purchase of all emission allowances, significant transfer pricing considerations may arise.


For instance, if a Dutch entity is designated as the central purchasing hub for all allowances for the group, and it subsequently sells these allowances to other group entities (e.g., operating companies in Greece, Spain, or Germany), it would be necessary to determine the appropriate remuneration for the Dutch entity based upon its functions performed, risks assumed, and assets utilized. This may result in concluding that the activities of the Dutch entity can be characterized as a service (central purchasing hub with no risk), or alternatively as a party to the sale of the emission allowances (where the Dutch entity also manages and controls certain risks). Furthermore, as mentioned above, if the group manages its financial risk resulting from the fluctuating prices of the emission allowances through hedging activities, it would be necessary to ensure that such hedging activities are appropriately remunerated from a transfer pricing perspective. It is therefore crucial to understand the functions performed, risks assumed, and assets utilized by the Dutch entity, as well as the other parties involved in the transactions, to ensure an appropriate transfer pricing policy is implemented. The group should also maintain adequate transfer pricing documentation to justify the arm’s length nature of the pricing of the transactions between the parties.

Shipping companies that benefit from the Dutch tonnage tax regime should assess whether the costs associated with emission allowances affect their eligibility or the calculation of their taxable base. The Dutch tonnage tax regime allows companies to calculate their taxable profit based on the net tonnage of their fleet, typically resulting in a lower tax base compared to the standard corporate tax regime.


For instance, if a company under the Dutch tonnage tax regime incurs significant costs related to emission allowances, it must determine whether these costs are deductible within the tonnage tax framework. Given the complexities of how the Dutch tax authorities may interpret these rules, aligning with them early can help avoid unexpected tax assessments and ensure compliance.

How Deloitte can assist


Navigating the complexities of the EU ETS and understanding its potential tax implications under Dutch law requires specialized knowledge and a strategic approach. Our dedicated offshore and shipping team offers a range of services to help shipping companies manage these new requirements:

  • Compliance support: Assistance with setting up internal processes for monitoring, reporting, and verifying CO2 emissions in compliance with EU ETS and Dutch tax requirements.
  • Tax advisory services: Guidance on the VAT, corporate tax, and transfer pricing implications of emission allowance transactions. This includes support for aligning with the Dutch tax authorities to address potential tax issues and optimize tax positions.
  • Tonnage tax review: Evaluation of the impact of the EU ETS on eligibility and calculations under the Dutch tonnage tax regime and advice on mitigating any adverse effects.
  • Strategic planning: Development of strategies for purchasing allowances, hedging, financial planning, and exploring potential offsetting opportunities to minimize compliance costs and manage financial impact.
  • Tax rulings: Support in engaging with the Dutch tax authorities to clarify and tax treatments and secure agreements on VAT, transfer pricing methodologies, and other complex issues. Early engagement can help mitigate risks and provide greater certainty for tax strategies.

Contact

 

The extension of the EU ETS to the shipping sector introduces new regulatory and tax challenges, particularly within the Dutch fiscal framework. Early preparation, a clear understanding of the potential tax implications, and proactive alignment with the Dutch tax authorities are crucial steps in ensuring tax compliance. For tailored advice and assistance, we invite you to contact Deloitte’s experts below.

Register for Tax newsletters