Recently, we shared a regulatory update about Chapter 3 of the Financial Institutions Rulebook (known as FIR/03) issued by the Malta Financial Services Authority (MFSA). In this article, the first in our series on FIR/03, focuses on one of the regulation's key aspects - Safeguarding.
Financial institutions (FIs) must ringfence client funds received for payments or in exchange for e-money by holding them in segregated, safeguarded accounts. The objective of this measure is to ensure that clients can retrieve their funds from the institution in a timely manner in the event of a failure. Effective safeguarding minimises the risk of shortfalls, delays in identifying consumer entitlements, and costs incurred during insolvency.
Insolvency risk in the payments industry is not negligible. Between Q1 2018 and Q2 2023, 12 payment firms subject to safeguarding practices became insolvent in the UK alone, resulting in significant shortfalls of client funds. This underscores the reason regulators have identified safeguarding of client funds as a priority area in their supervision plans.
The safeguarding section of the regulation has been significantly bolstered, raising the compliance bar and detailing regulator expectations. This includes requirements related to reconciliations, policies, transfers, audit and notification requirements, responsible persons, and credit institutions.
FIs should ensure compliance with the new requirements immediately, as the full extent of the new rule came into force on 15 December 2024. For some institutions, achieving compliance may necessitate changes in systems, processes and operations and this may also impact the level of human resources or automation required. Here are the most critical aspects:
FIs must safeguard client funds in EU credit institutions or branches of third-country credit institutions in Malta. This may be challenging for organisations based outside Europe (e.g., UK) using non-EU credit institutions. FIs should review their arrangements to ensure compliance and notify the MFSA of any changes.
The regulator mandates that financial institutions (FIs) regularly perform reconciliations between the balance of clients' funds recorded in their internal systems and the actual balance held in safeguarding accounts with third parties.
In determining the frequency of these reconciliations Fis should consider several factors. This includes the risks faced by the FI, the size and complexity of its business, and the outcomes of periodic reviews performed on the credit institutions used for safeguarding purposes. Risks are generally considered to be greater, where the FIs invest client funds and/or permit merchants to transact in multiple currencies.
Additionally, the regulation mandates that any reconciliation discrepancies (shortfall/surplus) are corrected as soon as practicable and by no later than the same business day.
In meeting the above regulatory expectations, we have noted that the FIs are facing certain challenges as follows:
FIs must demonstrate they have adequate internal control mechanisms to minimise the risk of loss of relevant funds through fraud, misuse, or negligence. This includes a well-documented and Board-approved safeguarding policy detailing the safeguarding methodology, governance arrangements, critical systems, third-party assessments, and reconciliation methodology.
Additionally, FIs should have a dedicated reconciliation procedure that is detailed and clear, covering data sources, the controls to ensure the accuracy, completeness and integrity of the data used in the reconciliation, actions for reconciliation breaks, and rationale for reconciliation frequencies. FIs must ensure that their policies and procedures accurately reflect current practices.
The regulator has introduced several mechanisms for ongoing monitoring of FIs safeguarding arrangements:
Our FinTech team, comprising industry specialists, can help you understand and navigate through the new regulatory expectations. We can support you with:
Please reach out to our team to discuss how we can assist you.