After almost a year of tough negotiations, heated debates, and hard-fought compromises within the governing coalition, the new tax regime for capital gains on financial assets has finally been adopted by the Belgian Parliament (Dutch | French). The new framework is set to reshape how investment income is taxed in Belgium. Here is a clear overview of its key features—and what they mean in practice. The overview features detailed clarifications provided by the Minister of Finance during the parliamentary discussions.
The new regime applies to individuals (personal income tax) and non-profit entities (legal entities tax), such as non-profit organisations (vzw’s/asbl) and foundations. However, there is an exclusion for legal persons that can receive donations eligible for a tax reduction.
The new capital gains tax applies to capital gains realised outside professional activities upon the transfer for consideration of financial assets falling under normal management of private assets.
In addition, two events are subject to the new capital gains tax, even though they are not realised for consideration:
A transfer for no consideration of financial assets to a non-resident taxpayer (e.g. via donation) is not in scope of the new capital gains tax, unless the general anti-abuse clause can be applied.
The following transfers are not in scope because they do not take place for consideration:
Financial assets comprise 4 categories:
The regime applies to three categories of transfers:
The following capital gains are exempt from the new regime:
Only capital gains realised within the normal management of private assets are subject to the new capital gains tax. The existing rules and rates regarding speculation and abnormal management of private assets remain unchanged.
The taxable base is the positive difference between the sale price and the ‘acquisition value’. If the financial assets were held by the taxpayer or his legal predecessor on 31 December 2025, a ‘step-up’ applies: historical capital gains built up before 1 January 2026 are exempt; only capital gains built up from 2026 are taxable. This also applies to shares received historically under a ‘roll over’ regime (merges, demergers, ‘fusion à l’anglaise’ operations) following (the revised) Article 95 ITC92.
The FIFO principle (first in, first out) applies to staggered purchases of identical financial assets from 2026. If you invest via a fund savings plan with monthly contributions in a fund, or buy the same share at different times, then it is important to know which purchase price applies when selling part of these shares. The capital gain is calculated on the basis of the purchase price of these first purchased shares.
The following rules determine the value of the financial assets on 31 December 2025:
Upon sale of shares acquired following the exercise of stock options qualifying under the stock option law, the actual market value of the share at exercise is taken as the purchase price instead of the exercise price. For example: if you can buy shares for EUR 20 while the market value is EUR 35 at exercise, the purchase price for capital gains tax is set at EUR 35. The same rule applies for non-qualifying stock options taxable at exercise.
For shares acquired following the exercise of ordinary options not taxed as professional income, the exercise price is taken as the acquisition value. This means that if you have the right to buy shares for EUR 20 while the market value is EUR 35, the purchase price for capital gains tax is EUR 20.
For tradeable options, the acquisition value can be determined as the higher of the actual value when the options become tradeable or the taxable value under the stock option law. For example: if you receive a tradeable bank warrant from your employer at EUR 10, which is worth EUR 10.5 when it becomes tradeable and you sell the option for EUR 11, capital gains tax will be due on EUR 0.5.
For persons moving to Belgium after 1 January 2026, a special regime applies. They receive a step-up at the time they enter Belgium. As a result, only the capital gain built up during the Belgian period will be taxable. However, this regime does not apply if one returns to Belgium within two years after leaving Belgium. In that case, the acquisition value of the original entry will be taken into account, to be increased with the amount which has been subject to the foreign tax of a similar nature to the capital gains tax (if any).
Realised losses can be deducted from realised capital gains. This is only possible if the loss was realised by the same person, in the same year and in the same category of taxable financial assets (i.e. in one of the three categories mentioned).
For assets acquired before 1 January 2026, the loss is calculated as the negative difference between the price received and the value on 31 December 2025.
In principle, no account is taken of historical losses. However, an exception applies to transfers taking place until 31 December 2030. For realised capital gains during the first five years after the entry into force, the taxpayer may prove the historical acquisition value (if higher than the value on 31 December 2025). However, if it concerns staggered purchases of identical financial assets, the purchase price will be calculated as the weighted average of all purchases made before 31 December 2025.
Following rates apply when realising (non-professional) capital gains on financial assets within the normal management of private assets:
The full amount of the exemption (<EUR 1,000,000) can only be used once every five years. The sale of a substantial interest to a non-EEA company continues to be taxed at 16.5%, but also with application of the EUR 1,000,000 exemption.
Under the general regime, the capital gains tax is in principle levied via a movable withholding tax of 10%, withheld by the intermediary established in Belgium. This withholding tax is final (no additional taxation). The movable withholding obligation applies exclusively to capital gains on financial instruments and certain insurance contracts.
The Belgian intermediary does not take into account deductible losses, exemptions or a higher acquisition value, so such kind of corrections must always be made via the income tax return. When no Belgian intermediary is involved (e.g. securities portfolio held with a foreign bank), the taxpayer must declare the income himself in the personal income tax return (or legal entities income tax return).
The taxpayer may opt not to subject the realised capital gains to the movable withholding tax (so-called ‘opt-out’). The taxpayer must explicitly opt for this, together with all other holders. In case of opt-out, the financial institution will provide information about the capital gains to the tax authorities.
For capital gains under the internal capital gains regime or the substantial interest regime, collection always takes place via the income tax return of the taxpayer.
Together with the capital gains tax, a new exit tax is introduced if the tax residence of a qualifying Belgian taxpayer is transferred abroad.
The practical implementation of the exit tax differs depending on the country of destination:
Regarding this payment deferral the minister has explained that transfers for consideration within two years of exit that would not be taxable if the taxpayer had remained resident in Belgium, e.g. an exempt contribution of shares, will not end the payment deferral.
The tax due is waived in both situations if there is no sale or a re-entry into Belgium within 2 years following departure from Belgium.
In case of split ownership, only the bare owner is regarded as the taxpayer. Emigration of the usufructuary abroad therefore does not lead to realisation of a capital gain in the hands of the bare owner.
By analogy with the DAC6 reporting rules for cross-border arrangements, a new reporting obligation is introduced for intermediaries involved in transactions relating to shares falling under the substantial interest regime or the internal capital gains regime.
Exceptions apply for holders of professional secrecy in compliance with the case law of the EU Court of Justice on DAC6.
The new regime applies from 1 January 2026. The withholding of the movable withholding tax as referred to in Article 261, paragraph 1, 5° ITC92 will enter into force on 1 June 2026. As of 1 June 2026, the withholding tax is the default option (opt-in). If taxpayers prefer the opt-out, they should notify their bank no later than 1 June. Otherwise, the default option will apply automatically.
For the period between 1 January 2026 and 1 June 2026 a transitional provision applies. During this period, collection will not automatically take place via withholding by intermediaries, but the taxpayer will have to report the capital gain in his personal income tax return. However, he may choose to have withholding tax withheld at equivalent (i.e. post factum). This transitional regime can only be enjoyed if it is an explicit choice (opt-in). This opt-in must be made before 31 August 2026.
For Belgian insurance companies a transitional regime runs until 31 August 2026 (optional opt-in). After that date the final withholding tax applies (default rule) .
Discretion
Initially, there was fear that the new capital gains tax would lay the foundation for the introduction of a general wealth register. However, some capital gains will in future be able to continue to enjoy discretion by opting for the ‘opt-in’, both during the transitional period (from 1 January until 1 June 2026) and after 1 June 2026. In that case, only the final movable withholding tax applies. Concretely, this means that the tax authorities will not gain insight via the new capital gains tax into the frequency and size of stock exchange transactions.
Impact on wealth planning
Donations
Transfers without consideration (such as donations, inheritances) are not included in the capital gains tax. Since there is no capital gains tax upon inheritance or gift of financial assets, the acquisition value of the donee or heir is equal to the price paid for the asset by the donor or testator (or value determined per 31 December 2025). If the donor or testator also acquired the financial asset free of charge, then the price at which their legal predecessor acquired the financial asset is retained as the acquisition value, and so on.
Impact on undivided ownership (onverdeeldheid/indivision)
The capital gains tax applies to any termination of undivided ownership, unless the termination results within a period of 3 years from a death, divorce or termination of legal or de facto cohabitation.
The minister confirms that this exemption can also apply in case of a voluntary purchase in undivided ownership when one of the co-owners of an existing undivided property passes away and the other co-owners subsequently terminate the undivided ownership. According to the minister, this also applies when a gift occurs in undivided ownership, and the undivided ownership is effectively terminated within three years after the donor’s death.
Impact on ordinary partnerships (maatschap/société simple).
The minister states that entering or terminating an ordinary partnership as such does not lead to an implicit exchange moment, so in principle this is not subject to capital gains tax. However, if there is an implicit exchange moment, there is a partial transfer and thus taxation arises in principle. In the Explanatory Memorandum it has been clarified that the general exemption for the contribution of shares applies to the contribution of shares into the ordinary partnership.
An implicit exchange moment arises, for example when during the lifetime of an ordinary partnership a new partner joins the ordinary partnership or in case of the exit of a partner.
The finance minister also confirms that upon the dissolution of the ordinary partnership, there will be no realization event if the underlying assets are simply allocated to partners in undivided ownership in the same proportions. The minister concludes that transfers within the family via an ordinary partnership remain entirely possible, although he acknowledges that in the future the specific rules of the capital gains tax will need to be taken into account.
The minister also confirms that the calculation (example) of the Explanatory Memorandum. This means that the roll-over of the original acquisition value should be approached as a whole and thus without considering the position of individual partners.
Notwithstanding the minister’s clarifications, the calculations of the taxable base will cause the necessary complexity and administrative burden.
Unexpectedly the minister confirms that the transfer for consideration of the shares of an ordinary partnership not holding any financial assets falls within the capital gains tax’ scope. This would imply that ordinary partnerships holding art, real estate, or classic cars would be subject to capital gains tax when their shares are sold.
Impact on the foundation-administration office (STAK)
Also important is the impact of the capital gains tax on other tax transparent structures (such as the foundation-administration office (StAK)). The Explanatory Memorandum is reassuring regarding StAKs falling under the scope of the certification law. The regime of tax neutrality of certification is therefore not jeopardised.
Impact of the marital property regime
It was unclear whether the contribution of a portfolio to the marital community between spouses gives rise to any form of capital gains tax. According to the finance minister the answer is negative. Although there is a transfer (at least economic) of the portfolio, it does not constitute a transfer for consideration.
To qualify for the substantial interest regime each individual shareholder needs to have a 20% participation. When shares belong to the marital community the minister has clarified that the marital community needs to own 40% of the shares. Regarding shares for which titre et finance applies the finance minister specifies that the spouse in whose name the shares are registered needs to hold a participation of 20% of the shares of the company in order to qualify for the regime.
Usufruct situations
If a financial asset is encumbered by an usufruct and the full property (or bare property) of the financial asset is sold, the law designates the bare owner as the taxpayer.
Furthermore, the finance minister has clarified that there is no taxable capital gain upon the mere sale of usufruct by the usufructuary. This is also the case when the usufruct is converted into a sum of money. Following the finance minister there is equally no realization upon extinction of the (statutory) usufruct by, for example, death. However, the finance minister also points out that the tax administration will monitor for potential abuse or artificial avoidance of capital gains tax through usufruct transfer techniques.
Stock options
Stock options that are accepted in writing within 60 days following the offer are taxable at grant in Belgium and no longer at exercise. Today, no further taxation takes place at the moment of the sale of the shares.
As of 1 January 2026, the capital gain realized at later sale of the shares will be calculated on the value increase after exercise. The acquisition value of the share for capital gains tax purposes will thus not be based on the exercise price of the option. This entails that the exercise gain itself will not be subject to the new capital gains tax.
Example
If options with an exercise price of 10 EUR are worth 12 EUR at exercise and are sold for 15 EUR, 3 EUR will be subject to capital gains tax.
For tradable options that are offered as alternative pay-out methods for short-term incentives (so-called warrants and over-the-counter options offered by financial providers), the acquisition value of the option will be determined based on the higher of (1) the market value at the time the option becomes tradeable or (2) the taxable value under the stock option law. For the over-the-counter options, this means the value at expiry of the one-year waiting period will in practice be taken into account.
Example
If over-the-counter options are worth 10 EUR at offer, 11 EUR at the end of the blocking period and 13 EUR when they are sold to the bank, 2 EUR will be subject to capital gains tax.
Free or discounted shares
For free shares (e.g. restricted and performance share plans) and shares purchased with a discount, the discount, which was already taxed as professional income or exempt under the 100/120-rule, will not be taxed again.
For shares acquired at a discount under the specific tax regime of article 7:204 of the Code of Companies and Associations (tax-free discount of 20% for shares that are inter alia blocked for 5 years), the value at the moment of acquisition will be considered (not the price paid).
Example
For shares bought at 80 EUR whilst the stock price is 100 EUR, capital gains tax will be due on 10 EUR if they are sold for 110 EUR.
Management Incentive Plans
In the context of a private equity investment or buy out, often co – investment is envisaged for key stakeholders – individuals (investment managers, executives). These schemes will also be targeted by the new legislation, to the extent the realized gains do not qualify as miscellaneous or professional income.
During the parliamentary process, the finance minister emphasized that under the new law co-investment structures and MBO structures are not at risk to fall in scope of the internal capital gains regime. To provide more legal certainty, the finance minister has announced that this position will also be confirmed in a circular letter later.
Structures though whereby such co – investment is done via an investment into a private privak, would remain out of scope though (given the exemption of withholding tax for distributions stemming from sales of shares by the privak).
Apart from a more increased compliance burden for the financial sector (new withholding tax obligation, additional ‘DAC 6 – like’ obligations, it is also expected that the combination of the new tax, with the application of the Reynders Tax, will lead to more complex calculations and obligations.
The Reynders Tax will continue to apply alongside the new capital gains tax on financial assets. Specifically, for funds falling in scope of the Reynders Tax, the interest component of capital gains realised on investment funds subject to the Reynders Tax will be taxed at 30%, while the remainder of the capital gains exceeding the EUR 10,000 / EUR 15,000 exemption threshold will be taxed at 10%. This implies that the reporting requirements related to investment funds under the Reynders Tax (such as Asset Test and TIS computations) will continue to apply. An additional layer of complexity in the reporting computations will be that both the interest component (for Reynders tax purposes) and capital gain component (for the new capital gains tax purposes) need to be determined for each Net Asset Value (NAV), and that furthermore for the capital gain component NAV as per 31 December 2025 needs to be determined as historical capital gains built up before 1 January 2026 are exempt.
Transparent funds (such as an SCSp or LP) remain tax transparent - including for capital gains tax - provided their managers supply investors with sufficient information regarding underlying income (often referred to as ‘ventilation’). However, practical difficulties may arise, particularly concerning the deemed exchange moment for open-ended funds. For Belgian investors participating via a Private Privak/Pricaf Privée, the finance minister has confirmed that the tax exemption for dividends derived from capital gains realized by the vehicle remains in place.
The finance minister also clarified that gains realized upon the redemption of bonds at maturity, as well as cash settlements of derivatives, fall within the scope of capital gains tax.
The legislation introduces the need for valuation of the shares in the top tier entity of the group, at the cut-off date of 31/12/2025. It is important to be mindful that various ‘instances’ in a corporate group and its ownership chain, may lead to a valuation triggering event under the new law of capital gains tax (inheritance or donation of shares in context of estate planning; an intra group sale of a part of the business for TP purposes; the issuance of stock options by the group under the Law of 1999; etc.). One needs to be sure that the valuation methodology used is consistent across the board, and that there is an ‘info sharing’ governance foreseen from owner to management and vice versa, to mitigate risk of discrepancies, causing potential tax risks.
Did you find this useful?
To tell us what you think, please update your settings to accept analytics and performance cookies.