Skip to main content

For every new entrant under 25 years, there are more than five utility workers who are 45 years and older—more than double the economywide ratio.1 No other major growth industry is simultaneously expanding and preparing to replace most of its experienced workforce.2 Artificial intelligence–driven growth and workforce aging have converged as AI transforms the workforce and the work itself in an “AI-ging” moment. Utilities must now address aging, growth, and AI all at once. Success hinges on workforce redesign to enable effective human-machine collaboration across a new generation of talent and technologies. Utilities that act now may find that the retirement wave presents an opportunity to reinvent how work gets done.

Historic growth ahead

AI has sparked a momentous surge in the utilities industry, building on long-term structural growth from electrification. The sector is among the nation’s fastest-growing, as are many of its occupations.3 Related careers may require some of the fastest-changing skills.

Deloitte estimates that the announced expansion of utility-scale grid-connected generation could create the equivalent of more than 1.2 million additional jobs in the United States by 2035.4 These include temporary construction jobs measured in job-years5 and permanent operational jobs in labor-intensive nuclear, hydroelectric, and geothermal generation, in addition to the solar, wind, storage, and gas projects that account for the bulk of planned generation (figure 1).

Utilities are the fastest-growing major industry sector of the US economy.6 Moreover, in terms of employment growth, the top three fastest-growing industries are tied specifically to electric power, with electric equipment manufacturing in the top five, and other electric power generation in the top ten (figure 2).7

Within these industries are the nation’s second and fourth fastest-growing occupations—solar photovoltaic installers and wind turbine service technicians—which also have rapidly evolving skill requirements.8 Over the past three years, about three-quarters of the skills required for these occupations have changed.9 Energy and nuclear engineers also rank among the top 20 occupations experiencing the highest levels of skill change.10

The utilities sector is short of both workers and the skills it needs to grow.11 And the shortfall is deepening at a time of intensified competition for the same talent pool from other AI infrastructure builders and operators.12 Also standing in the way of utilities seizing the opportunities that the AI economy has opened is a looming retirement cliff.

An aging workforce

Across industries, utilities have the highest concentration of older workers: Eighty percent of utility employment is at firms where at least a quarter of workers are over 55 years.13 By this metric, utilities are in a league of their own (figure 3). In manufacturing, the sector with the second-highest concentration, only 46% of employment is at firms with at least a quarter of workers over 55 years.

The utilities industry’s age profile has also changed over the past two decades. The concentration of older workers has risen sharply, outpacing all other industries.14

Historically, long tenures have contributed to utilities’ outlier workforce. Median employee tenure peaked at 9.5 years in 2018, the highest for any industry across private and public sectors and more than double the national median.15

While tenure has since declined, the ratio of retiring workers to young entrants remains high due to low turnover among the experienced workforce. As retirements accelerate, that imbalance could become one of the industry’s defining workforce challenges.

A closing window for action

These aging trends leave utilities with a limited window to act. There are more than five utility workers age 45 and older for every new entrant under age 25, compared with the economywide ratio of less than 2:1.16 With half of their workers being over 45 years, utilities could lose much of their current talent and knowledge base to retirements within the next decade (figure 4).

Complicating workforce planning is the uneven timing and distribution of utility workforce aging. The largest age cohort in utilities has shifted five times over the past decade, compared with just once for the US workforce overall (figure 5).17 Utilities should anticipate not only how many workers are expected to exit but also the moving target of when and where transitions will occur.

The challenge is uneven geographically too. Utility workforce trends do not align with broader state aging trends.18 The largest age cohort may be over 45 years for a state, but under 45 years for utilities in the state, and vice versa. Yet, in nearly half of the US states, older age groups already dominate their utilities sector (figure 6).

In business-as-usual times, a large generation of older workers exiting the sector without younger workers entering could pose an operational challenge. Today, it indicates a workforce shortage as the industry grows. Rapid expansion in capital investment has further impacted traditional approaches to building the workforce needed to keep pace with AI infrastructure execution demands.

Utilities may need to leverage AI itself to multiply what each worker can do.

“AI-ging” the utilities workforce

As it drives industry growth, AI is also redefining workforce capabilities. An aging workforce managing an aging grid under legacy models is not likely to deliver growth at the pace needed. Utilities could leverage AI to help.

Securing a future-ready workforce likely goes beyond like-for-like replacement of retiring workers and headcount growth. For utilities, the path forward may include redesigned processes that can unlock true human-machine collaboration in managing knowledge and delivering value. As utility work is broken into tasks, effort can gradually shift from today’s aging workforce to a new generation of workers in redefined roles, supported by AI that becomes increasingly embedded in workflows as it matures across generative, agentic, and physical forms. Orchestration of AI-enabled people and processes toward outcomes will likely become a premium human skill, as will the ability to operate assets manually if needed. 

AI is expected to impact most utility roles, albeit in different ways and on different timelines.19 Foundational data capabilities should be in place to help enable AI-assisted, -augmented, and -powered solutions. Resistance to adopting new processes that change decades-long practices can also be a challenge. But once these solutions are implemented alongside operating model changes, they can help counter workforce aging through “AI-ging”—the transformation of workforce roles and skills and the work itself as AI reshapes talent needs (figure 7).

While AI can help utilities maximize the capabilities of each worker, it will likely also be important to help address the underlying talent pipeline issues. Few organizations have succeeded in offsetting workforce aging and related outflows while attracting sufficient new talent to meet historic growth. But if utility firms can close the gap with AI-fluent workers, their odds of rising to the occasion might improve.

A gen AI to Z opportunity

Untapped opportunities exist to connect AI-fluent workers’ capabilities with the industry’s growing workforce needs. Demand for AI talent is accelerating: The share of utility job postings requiring AI skills rose by more than 44% between 2024 and 2025.20 Utility workers are adopting gen AI faster than the US workforce overall, yet they report saving less than half as much time as AI users economywide (figure 8).21 This suggests that realizing AI’s full value may first require improved processes and workforce readiness.

Younger workers may be well positioned to help meet these needs. Gen Z leads in AI adoption, ease of use, and productivity gains.22 Gen Z’s familiarity with AI could help accelerate effective adoption, while experienced workers could contribute domain expertise and operational judgment. Research suggests that Gen Z achieves its greatest productivity gains when advancing AI initiatives on generationally diverse teams.23

Intergenerational collaboration can be especially valuable for utilities. Workers who are new to the industry may benefit from greater guidance in an industry where AI implementation often proceeds with limited communication from leadership—the complexities of utilities’ regulated operating environment may help explain this “stealth adopter” behavior.24 This type of collaboration can also help bridge generational divides. Utilities have an opportunity to intentionally pair experienced workers’ institutional knowledge with AI fluency to strengthen knowledge transfer, accelerate effective AI adoption, and improve productivity. The result might be capabilities that no single generation could achieve alone.

The Gen Z talent equation

Winning Gen Z talent will be important for this opportunity. Backfilling retiring workers and accelerating the industry’s AI transformation may depend on attracting a generation that remains underrepresented in utilities.25 It will likely take more than posting open positions. With relatively low appeal among Gen Z,26 utilities should consider both the career opportunities they offer and how they communicate them to help compete for the next generation of talent.

Despite recruiting challenges, utilities possess strong early-career value propositions in the economy, particularly for the growing number of Gen Z workers choosing trades over a four-year degree.27 These core trade roles are where the retirement wave is arriving first and hiring demand is growing fastest.28 In plant operator and trade occupations, Gen Z entrants can advance quickly and earn more than peers in other occupations requiring a certificate or associate degree.29 Construction and technical trades are among the four certificate programs whose graduates earn more within five years of enrollment than comparable individuals who never enrolled, and they are also the two associate-degree fields with the largest earnings gains (figure 9).30

Competitive compensation is only part of the equation. To attract Gen Z, utilities should also align with the generation’s workplace expectations. Work/life balance ranks among the top workplace priorities for Gen Z, reflecting a broader emphasis on well-being.31 Meeting those expectations can be challenging in field operations, which offer less flexibility than the hybrid and remote arrangements that office roles may offer. Even where work from home is possible, it can constrain progression unless utilities provide mentorship and on-the-job learning.32

Purpose is even more important.33 Gen Z considers a sense of purpose crucial to both job satisfaction and well-being, with 80% of Gen Z adults surveyed seeking careers centered on making a positive impact, although fewer than half of Gen Z workers surveyed say they have found one.34 Here, utilities may be underselling one of their strengths. While the industry’s current growth story centers on powering AI, younger workers may connect more strongly with a broader mission such as the energy transition. Indeed, Gen Z’s engagement with renewable energy suggests that this mission may be resonant: According to the March 2026 Deloitte ConsumerSignals survey, 53% of US Gen Z respondents regularly power their home with renewables, compared to 17% for Gen X, boomers, and older generations combined.35

Finally, there are gaps between Gen Z expectations and experiences with their supervisors in the workplace. Fifty-three percent of US Gen Zs surveyed in the energy and industrials sector expect managers to coach employees, but only 33% experience such coaching.36 Meanwhile, 42% of US Gen Zs in the sector expect close supervision of day-to-day tasks, but 58% experience it.37

An industry’s age profile can shape workplace norms, technology adoption, and employee expectations, reinforcing itself over time. Workers of the same age tend to cluster, creating a workplace that reflects their preferences.38 Without stronger recruitment, utilities could risk becoming more digitally constrained just as AI capabilities become increasingly important. On the other hand, attracting and empowering more Gen Z workers could inject the digital fluency, evolving workplace expectations, and cultural momentum needed to transform utilities into truly AI-native organizations.

Pathways to close the talent gap

In utilities, an acute workforce aging trend has run up against explosive growth. To help manage both, utilities should look to redesign work with AI-enabled processes that augment knowledge transfer and skill development. Utility leaders can consider the following actions (figure 10).

  1. Test transition timelines. Scenario plan around workforce turnover, demographic trends, and AI usage and exposure. This can help define the windows for action to maintain and manage knowledge by role. It can also lay the foundation for longer-term strategic workforce planning.
  2. Capture, codify, and communicate knowledge. Identify critical and concentrated core role knowledge. Accelerate the capture of siloed knowledge. Consolidate and codify content to help it be consumable and usable across age cohorts, platforms, and worksites.
  3. Gauge the gap to growth. Assess ways to fill the gap between retirement-driven workforce losses and AI-driven demand. Rethink the size, scope, and complexity of roles across the core, contingent, and contractor workforces. Segment categories of talent to recruit, onboard, train, and retrain for existing and new roles and skills. Compare these needs with local workforce and skill availability, especially as manufacturers increasingly compete for the same talent.
  4. Draw out hidden and ladder skills. Recognize skills learned on the job that may not be documented. Quantify the operational continuity risk of these hidden skills sliding down the chute as talent retires. Identify ladder skills that workers could climb more quickly by leveraging AI.
  5. Tailor training to top off and attract. Develop appealing, accessible, and calibrated training that tops off uncovered skills and employees’ existing skills. Implement new forms of delivery informed by real-time workforce analytics. Tie training more closely to industry purpose. Partner with educational and workforce development institutions, unions, manufacturers, and tech companies to create training centers and expand the locally available talent pool for shared core roles facing shortages.

In a broader national context of workforce aging and “AI-ging”—trends that could complement, complicate, or compound each other—utilities can act based on measured realities and the unknowns those measurements reveal. Utilities facing the paradox of aging fast while growing faster could integrate gen AI and Gen Z to help resolve it. The retirement wave could become an opportunity to reinvent the organization.

Continue the conversation

Meet the industry leaders

Thomas L. Keefe

Vice Chair, US Power, Utilities & Renewables Leader | Deloitte & Touche LLP
Deloitte United States

Zac Quayle

Principal, Deloitte Consulting LLP
Deloitte United States

Kate Hardin

Executive director | Deloitte Research Center for Energy & Industrials | Deloitte Services LP
Deloitte United States

by

Michael Cleveland

United States

Zac Quayle

Deloitte United States

Chris Murphy

United States

Kate Hardin

Deloitte United States

Carolyn Amon

Deloitte United States

ENDNOTES

  1. Deloitte analysis of data from US Census Bureau, Quarterly Workforce Indicators, accessed June 2026.

  2. Deloitte analysis of US Bureau of Labor Statistics, “Employment projections,” accessed September 2026.

  3. Ibid.

  4. Deloitte analysis of data from S&P Global for planned generation; DC Byte for planned data centers; Angela Ryu and Shon R. Hiatt, “Combined cycle gas turbine (CCGT) plants employment forecast analysis,” Hamm Institute for American Energy at Oklahoma State University, Dec. 22, 2025 for gas employment factors; Jay Rutovitz, Rusty Langdon, Chris Briggs, Franziska Mey, Elsa  Dominish, and Kriti Nagrath, “Updated employment factors and occupational shares for the energy transition,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 212 (2025) for renewable generation employment factors; and company announcements and Department of Energy, “Pathways to commercial liftoff: Advanced nuclear,” and “Quantifying socioeconomic impacts of electricity generating technologies,” 2024 for nuclear.

  5. A job-year refers to one year of one job. This unit of measurement is used for the duration of inherently temporary construction jobs due to their limited nature. A project that creates 600 job-years could be a project that employs 600 construction workers for one year, 300 construction workers for two years, or 200 construction workers for three years.

  6. US Bureau of Labor Statistics, “Employment projections,” accessed September 2026.

  7. Ibid.

  8. Deloitte analysis of US Bureau of Labor Statistics and Lightcast data.

  9. Deloitte analysis of Lighcast skills disruption index.

  10. Deloitte analysis of Lightcast data.

  11. Deloitte analysis of data from Lightcast, US Bureau of Labor Statistics, US Census Bureau, S&P Global, Hamm Institute, and Rutovitz et al.

  12. Zac Quayle, Kate Hardin, Jaya Nagdeo, Shih Yu (Elsie) Hung, and Carolyn Amon, “In the AI age, data centers and power companies compete for the same core workforce,” Deloitte Insights, March 31, 2026.

  13. Deloitte analysis of US Census Bureau, “Business dynamics statistics of human capital,” April 2025.

  14. Ibid.

  15. Deloitte analysis of US Bureau of Labor Statistics data, accessed September 2026.

  16. Deloitte analysis of data from US Census Bureau, Quarterly Workforce Indicators, accessed June 2026.

  17. Deloitte analysis of data from the US Bureau of Labor Statistics, accessed September 2026.

  18. Deloitte analysis of data from US Census Bureau, Quarterly Workforce Indicators, accessed June 2026.

  19. Deloitte analysis.  

  20. The Stanford AI Index Report 2026.

  21. Project on Workforce at Harvard, “Generative AI adoption tracker,” accessed June 2026.

  22. Deloitte analysis of data from Daniel Jolles and Grace Lordan, “Bridging the generational AI gap: Unlocking productivity for all generations,” The Inclusion Initiative at the London School of Economics and Protiviti, October 2025; Ipsos, “Ipsos generations report 2026: Continuity vs rupture,” May 2026.

  23. Ibid.

  24. Deloitte analysis of industry scores from Felipe Ost Scherer, “How to read the 2026 AIDE Index,” AI-Driven Enterprise Institute, June 1, 2026.

  25. Deloitte analysis of data from US Census Bureau, Quarterly Workforce Indicators, accessed June 2026.

  26. International Energy Agency, “World energy employment 2025,” Dec. 5, 2025.

  27. Deloitte analysis of growth in wages over time across occupations in Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development’s Employment Outlook 2025 and National Student Clearinghouse, “Final fall enrollment trends,” Jan. 15, 2026.

  28. Deloitte analysis of Lightcast data.

  29. Postsecondary Commission, “Associate’s degree seekers: Programmatic cohorts,” accessed June 2026; Postsecondary Commission, “Certificate seekers: Programmatic cohorts,” accessed June 2026.

  30. Ibid.

  31. Bank of America, “Gen Z and the cost of adulting,” May 2026.

  32. Federal Reserve Bank of New York; Natalia Emanuel, Emma Harrington, and Amanda Pallais, “Remote work leaves younger workers sidelined,” June 1, 2026.

  33. World Economic Forum and Global Shapers Community, “Youth pulse 2026: Insights from the next generation for a changing world,” January 2026.

  34. Gallup, Walton Family Foundation, Making Caring Common project at Harvard University, “Gen Z wants to do good: How helping others supports meaning and wellbeing,” June 2026.

  35. Analysis of generational and income data from the Deloitte ConsumerSignals survey fielded in March 2026.

  36. Analysis of data cuts for US workers in the energy and industrials sector of the Deloitte Global 2026 Gen Z and Millennial Survey.

  37. Ibid.

  38. Martha Stinson and Sean Wang, “US workforce is aging, especially in some firms,” US Census Bureau, Dec. 2, 2025.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors would like to thank Elsie Hung, Anju Chalil, Tom Keefe, and Ethan Erickson for their subject matter input and review, and Paula Payton, David Levin, and Sameen Salam for their data science expertise.

The authors would like to acknowledge the support of Clayton Wilkerson for orchestrating resources related to the report; Kim Buchanan, who drove the marketing strategy and related assets to bring the story to life; Mariel Balaban for her leadership in public relations; Rithu Thomas and Aparna Prusty from the Deloitte Insights team who edited the report and supported its publication, and Harry Wedel for the visual design.

Editorial (including production and copyediting): Rithu Thomas, Cintia Cheong, Pubali Dey, and Aparna Prusty

Design: Harry Wedel, Pooja Lnu

Cover image by: Pooja Lnu

Knowledge services: Vanapalli Viswa Teja

COPYRIGHT