US energy and chemicals workforce: Transforming for a resilient future

Operating amid the new normal of economic variability and technology disruption, workforce transformation has become a top priority for the US energy and chemicals sector

Rick Carr

United States

David Yankovitz

United States

Nichelle McLemore

United States

Kate Hardin

United States

The US energy and chemicals (E&C) sector contributes over US$1.2 trillion to GDP and accounts for nearly 23% of exports.1 Additionally, almost 96% of all manufactured goods are directly affected by the business of chemistry.2 The sector also creates significant employment opportunities: For every person needed to produce and transport oil and gas (O&G), nearly 5.25 people are required to convert it into gasoline, chemicals, or plastics.3

Over the last decade, the E&C sector has utilized market shifts as opportunities to catalyze innovation and productivity increases. Growing macroeconomic uncertainty amid a renewed focus on US energy and manufacturing may provide further opportunity for innovation. How can companies upskill their workforce to lead the next round of technological advancement and build a sustained advantage in the industry?

The answer is complex due to an aging workforce, competition for skilled employees even beyond the energy sector, the physically demanding nature of some roles, and the cyclical nature of some subsectors.4 Further, the sector is addressing rising cost pressures, the disruptive impact of generative and agentic AI, and the ongoing evolution of end markets.5

To help gain a deeper understanding of the E&C workforce, consider a holistic view—one that goes beyond headline direct employment numbers and considers other ways the sector manages its operations. For example, our analysis (see key highlights below) suggests that the sector’s implied employment6 has declined by only 2.1% since 2014, compared with a 6.5% fall in direct employment.7 This includes adjustments for productivity gains and the use of external talent ecosystems (third-party contractors and outsourced IT staff). The collapse of oil prices in 2014 and again in 2020 prompted the O&G sector, particularly the upstream and oilfield services subsectors, to focus on process innovations (such as multi-pad drilling and longer laterals) and digital transformation to boost productivity. Meanwhile, the downstream refining and chemical subsectors, with established processes and input-output ratios, have not experienced the same increase in labor productivity.8

Therefore, the key to honing a competitive edge is to adopt a targeted transformation approach to talent, covering employment structures, occupational composition, skills and capabilities, and mobility of both tasks and people.

  • Market shifts have contributed to E&C companies looking to optimize their internal versus external capabilities, highlighting the sector’s growing agility. Investment numbers indicate that companies are equipping their workforce with more digital assets and broadening the scope of shared services.9 Likewise, maximizing the benefits of the external workforce can include integrated management of business operations and strategic utilization of the alliance ecosystem.
  • A demand-supply imbalance exists for both critical (for example, operations specialists, technicians, and certain engineering areas of expertise) and essential occupations (such as mechanics, maintenance, and vehicle operators).10 Meanwhile, E&C companies continue to prioritize safety, compliance, and automation roles.11
  • According to Deloitte’s analysis, nearly two-thirds of tasks in the E&C sector are expected to remain human-driven, but the remaining third presents opportunities to deliver higher value, reduce risk, and improve speed and accuracy through the synergy of humans, machines, and generative and agentic AI.12 Some companies are beginning to place greater emphasis on skills rather than solely focusing on core engineering knowledge.
  • Virtual, onsite, and hybrid ways of working are being reevaluated. Taking jobs to people by offering remote work operations in nontraditional cities (for the E&C sector) such as San Francisco and Seattle may be needed for specific skill sets, but the availability of the digital talent pool is increasing even in less expensive cities such as Phoenix.13 Similarly, companies are bringing people to jobs in Houston and reemphasizing the importance of onsite operations. Companies could explore other cities near traditional hiring locations (for instance, in Louisiana, Colorado, and Pennsylvania) and evaluate the mobility of tasks (from remote and harsh environments to onshore in-office locations) to help broaden their talent sourcing strategy and stay competitive.14

Over the next 10 years, rapid digital developments, particularly in generative and agentic AI, are expected to alter workforce composition and productivity trends. The sector’s direct workforce employment is projected to increase by 4.1%.15 However, rather than focusing solely on direct employment numbers, consider enhancing workforce effectiveness and empowerment enabled by advanced analytics, next-gen tools and systems, and targeted upskilling—leveraging the full scale of talent from internal to external sources. Additionally, the leadership of US E&C companies will likely need to manage people and virtual agents/bots. They are also expected to face a challenge of upskilling nearly 60% of their workforce over the next decade.16 How companies respond could determine whether they drive the next wave of innovation and strengthen their position in the industry.

To learn more about how sector leaders can redefine their work, workforce, and workplace strategies to thrive in an evolving landscape, download the full report.

Continue the conversation

Meet the industry leaders

Rick Carr

Vice Chair, U.S. Energy and Chemicals Leader | Deloitte

David Yankovitz

Principal | Deloitte Consulting LLP

Nichelle McLemore

US Oil & Gas Leader, Deloitte

Stephanie Stachura

Senior Manager | Human Capital Manufacturing

Kate Hardin

Executive director

by

Rick Carr

United States

David Yankovitz

United States

Nichelle McLemore

United States

Kate Hardin

United States

Anshu Mittal

India

Endnotes

  1. Deloitte analysis of data accessed from the US Bureau of Economic Analysis.

    View in Article
  2. American Chemistry Council, “Consumer safety and aliphatic diisocyanates,” accessed April 28, 2025.

    View in Article
  3. Deloitte analysis of data accessed from the US Bureau of Labor Statistics.

    View in Article
  4. US Energy Information Administration, “Short-term energy outlook: Global oil markets,” April 10, 2025; US Bureau of Labor Statistics, “Labor force statistics from the current population survey,” Jan. 29, 2025.

    View in Article
  5. Gartner, “Forecast analysis: Generative AI models,” December 2024.

    View in Article
  6. Implied employment includes internal/direct employment, employment savings from improved labor productivity, and third-party workforce.

    View in Article
  7. Deloitte analysis of US Bureau of Labor Statistics and Gartner Enterprise IT Spending Q4 2024.

    View in Article
  8. Deloitte analysis based on data accessed from US Bureau of Labor Statistics and S&P Capital IQ.

    View in Article
  9. Deloitte analysis of Gartner Enterprise IT Spending Q4 2024.

    View in Article
  10. Deloitte analysis of data from Lightcast database.

    View in Article
  11. Deloitte analysis of occupation data from US Bureau of Labor Statistics’ Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics program. 

    View in Article
  12. Deloitte analysis of data from Occupational Information Network (O*NET) and US Bureau of Labor Statistics.

    View in Article
  13. Deloitte analysis of data from Lightcast database.

    View in Article
  14. Ibid.

    View in Article
  15. Deloitte analysis of data accessed from the US Bureau of Labor Statistics and O*NET databases.

    View in Article
  16. Ibid.

    View in Article

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Abhinav Purohit, Ankhi Biswas, and Vamshi Guguloth for their extensive contributions to this report, including their extensive research, in-depth analysis, and narrative development.

The authors would like to extend a special thanks to Rajesh Medisetti and Akshay Prabhu from the Center for Machine Intelligence and Data Science (MInDS) team for their contri- butions to this piece, and to Thirumalai Kannan D. of the Deloitte Center for Government Insights for his contributions to the analysis.

The authors would also like to thank Stephanie Stachura, Kevin Gregory, Jim Rose, and Julia Tavlas for their subject matter input and review.

Finally, the authors would like to acknowledge the support of Clayton Wilkerson for orchestrating resources related to the report; Randy Brodeur, Katrina Drake Hudson, and Dario Failla who drove the marketing strategy and related assets to bring the story to life; Alyssa Weir for her leadership in public relations; Rithu Thomas from the Deloitte Insights team who edited the report and supported its publication; and Molly Piersol and Natalie Pfaff for the visual design.

Cover artwork: Pooja Lnu and Rahul Bodiga