Przejdź do głównej treści

Transfer pricing debt capacity and creditworthiness analyses for intra-group financing

Transfer pricing support for intra-group financing, including debt capacity analysis, creditworthiness assessment, credit rating determination.

Intra-group financing transactions are increasingly subject to scrutiny by tax authorities, particularly where related-party loans, interest expenses or financing structures may have a material impact on taxable income. Under the arm’s length principle, the terms and conditions of financial transactions between associated enterprises should be consistent with those that would have been agreed between independent parties in comparable circumstances. For this reason, taxpayers should not only support the arm’s length level of interest rates applied to intra-group financing but also demonstrate that the borrower had sufficient creditworthiness and debt capacity to obtain and manage the financing under market conditions.

Why debt capacity matters in transfer pricing

In the context of intercompany financing, tax authorities may examine whether the borrower would have been able to obtain a comparable level of debt from an independent lender and whether the financing should be respected as debt from a transfer pricing perspective. The OECD guidance on financial transactions refers to the accurate delineation of intra-group financial transactions, including the borrower’s ability to repay the debt and the economically relevant characteristics of the arrangement.  

A lack of sufficient debt capacity or creditworthiness may increase the risk that the tax authorities challenge the deductibility of interest expenses, question the arm’s length nature of the transaction or seek to recharacterise the financing arrangement. 

Therefore, a robust transfer pricing analysis of intra-group financing should address not only the interest rate, but also the commercial rationale, borrower credit profile, repayment capacity and market-based financing terms. 

Our transfer pricing support for intra-group financing

We assist taxpayers in preparing transfer pricing analyses for related-party financing transactions, including: 

  • Creditworthiness analyses of borrowers based on financial data, business performance and forecast information. 
  • Credit rating determination for transfer pricing purposes. 
  • Market interest rate benchmarking analyses based on comparable financing transactions. 
  • Debt capacity analyses assessing the borrower’s ability to incur and manage debt under arm’s length conditions. 
  • Review of intra-group loan terms, including maturity, currency, repayment schedule, collateral, subordination and other economically relevant features. 
  • Support in preparing transfer pricing documentation for financial transactions. 
  • Assistance during tax audits and disputes concerning intragroup financing. 

Key elements of an intra-group financing analysis

Credit rating determination is typically the starting point for transfer pricing analyses of intra-group financing. 

The objective is to determine the borrower’s credit profile based on actual or forecast financial data, taking into account relevant financial ratios, business circumstances and the broader economic position of the borrower. 

A credit rating analysis may be used to support the pricing of intra-group loans and to assess whether the applied interest rate reflects market conditions. 

A market interest rate benchmarking analysis aims to determine the arm’s length level of interest applicable to a related-party loan or other financing arrangement. 

The analysis is generally based on comparable third-party transactions or market data, taking into account key loan characteristics such as: 

  • loan amount, 
  • currency, 
  • maturity, 
  • seniority, 
  • security or guarantees, 
  • repayment profile, 
  • borrower credit rating, 
  • market conditions at the time of financing. 

The purpose of the analysis is to support the conclusion that the interest rate applied between related parties is consistent with the arm’s length principle. 

A debt capacity analysis assesses whether the borrower would have been able to obtain and service the financing under market conditions. 

The analysis typically focuses on the borrower’s ability to generate sufficient cash flows to meet interest and principal repayment obligations over the term of the financing. It may also consider market-based financial covenants, leverage ratios, debt service coverage ratios and other indicators used by independent lenders. 

This analysis is particularly important where the level of intra-group debt is significant or where the borrower’s financial position may raise questions regarding its ability to service the financing. 

Why work with us?

Our team provides practical and technically robust support in transfer pricing analyses for financial transactions. We combine transfer pricing expertise with experience in financial modelling, credit risk assessment and tax audit defence. 

By working with us, clients benefit from: 

  • extensive experience in intra-group financing and transfer pricing projects, 
  • a dedicated team specialising in benchmarking and financial transaction analyses, 
  • practical support in managing tax risk, 
  • robust documentation aligned with market practice and tax authority expectations, 
  • assistance in developing a defensible transfer pricing position before a tax audit begins. 

Preparing a debt capacity analysis at the time of entering into a financing transaction may significantly improve the taxpayer’s position in the event of a future tax audit. 

In one of our projects, the tax authority initially focused on challenging the interest rate applied to an intra-group loan. Tax authorities argued that independent parties would not have agreed to the level of interest applied in the transaction. 

During the proceedings, they questioned both the benchmarking methodology and the results of the interest rate analysis. We supported the client in demonstrating that the benchmarking analysis had been prepared with due care and in line with generally accepted transfer pricing practice. 

Following the exchange of written explanations, the authority shifted its focus from the interest rate itself to the borrower’s overall financial position and cash flow generation. The authority attempted to argue that, given the level of interest expense, the borrower would not have been able to operate on the market without support from related parties. 

This approach illustrates a broader trend in tax audits of related-party financing. Tax authorities may increasingly examine not only whether the interest rate is arm’s length, but also whether the borrower had sufficient capacity to incur and service the debt. 

For this reason, taxpayers should verify debt capacity and creditworthiness at the time of concluding an intra-group financing transaction, rather than only after a tax audit has started. A proactive analysis helps to build a stronger defence file and reduces the risk of disputes concerning interest deductibility and the arm’s length nature of financing arrangements.