Shaping the future of conduct in UAE financial institutions

The UAE financial services sector is entering a new phase in market conduct regulation. Over recent years, the introduction of Consumer Protection Regulations has laid the foundation for a more structured, customer-focused environment. Nowadays, the market is evolving beyond rule adoption towards conduct maturity, where embedding fairness, accountability, and risk-based supervision into everyday decision-making becomes paramount. Licensed financial institutions (LFIs) must adapt to this shift to consistently deliver fair customer outcomes and strengthen institutional resilience.

Author:

Karim El Kady

Evolving UAE Conduct Landscape

Download PDF (1MB) View PDF

The next phase of UAE market conduct is defined not just by new regulations but by how institutions embed customer fairness into governance, product design, and risk management. Regulators are moving towards risk-based supervision, focusing on whether conduct risk is understood, monitored, and actively managed. Key areas of focus include:

How customer outcomes are measured and evidenced
Whether product design reflects customer suitability
How complaints data informs root cause analysis and remediation
How governance structures drive accountability for conduct
Whether risk culture supports fair treatment of customers

Why conduct will continue to strengthen in the UAE

The UAE’s global reputation for trust and service quality depends on fairness in financial services. As the sector grows, supervisory focus on customer outcomes and fair treatment will deepen. This evolution is a continuation of an established path toward higher standards, not a change in direction.

Specialization is replacing generalization

A significant development in the UAE is the shift from broad consumer protection frameworks to deeper, specialized conduct disciplines. LFIs should treat conduct as a collection of critical risk areas requiring dedicated expertise, including:

Complaints and customer remediation

Moving from case handling to systemic root cause analysis and customer outcome measurement.

Responsible lending and product suitability

Emphasizing affordability, vulnerability, and long-term customer impact.

Governance and accountability

Clear ownership of conduct risk across the three lines of defense, supported by senior management oversight.

Financial inclusion and fair access

Ensuring products, channels, and communications serve a broad and diverse customer base.

What institutions should be doing now

Conduct must be addressed across the three lines of defense:

Internal audit

Moving from CPR reviews to specialist conduct assurance, covering complaints, responsible lending, governance, remediation, and frontline behavior.

Compliance and risk

Generating thematic insight across complaints, product governance, sales conduct, and vulnerable customer treatment. Quantifying conduct exposure and evaluating behavioral drivers.

Conduct leadership

Conduct differs from traditional control disciplines and requires deep expertise in customer harm, behavioral risk, governance accountability, and supervisory expectations.

Key areas of focus

Complaints as an early warning system

Complaint trends often reveal systemic issues before they escalate. Institutions that analyse root causes detect misconduct earlier and reduce customer harm.

Accountability strengthens lending discipline

Clear conduct ownership improves affordability and suitability decisions, reducing unsustainable debt and remediation exposure.

Affordability protects both customer and institution

Robust suitability assessments reduce defaults, complaints, and long-term conduct risk.

Preventive controls reduce misconduct

Behavioral monitoring, incentive alignment, and preventive controls lead to fewer conduct failures than reliance on post-event detection.

Did you find this useful?

Yes

No