Skip to main content

The Internet of Things: A technical primer

The Internet of Things connects people, places, and products and, in so doing, it offers opportunities of value creation and capture for a full panoply of stakeholders. Organisations, however, should be careful in focussing on IoT initiatives that solve real business problems and create real business value―not just connecting stuff for the sake of connecting stuff.

Introduction

TODAY, it seems easy to imagine a world in which a manufacturing enterprise enjoys complete visibility and monitoring of stock as it enters the factory, gets processed, and leaves the factory floor. Or a world where it is possible to remotely track and optimise production asset effectiveness—through introduction, maintenance, and retirement—and even detect system failures as they occur to maximise uptime. Or still, another world in which products are given sensor capabilities to detect usage patterns and, on that basis, inspire still more products and income streams.

It is easy to imagine these and other such worlds because it is in fact the world of smart connectivity within which we live today—thanks to the capabilities offered by the Internet of Things (IoT).

But it wasn’t always so easy or so “obvious.”

In 1991, long before anyone ever used the term “Internet of Things,” Mark Weiser, chief scientist at Xerox, imagined a world of “ubiquitous computing” in which all objects could sense, communicate, analyse and act with respect to other objects and people.1 But it was only in 1999 that the term “Internet of Things” was coined by Kevin Ashton, a technologist specialising in sensors and radio-frequency identification (RFID) tags.2 Over the years since then, we have witnessed various IoT applications evolve from concept to fruition across the full range of industries and use cases.3

This primer provides an overview of the IoT—its market space, key drivers, underlying challenges, potential solutions, and the business value it creates. The piece is intended to help readers understand at a high level why they should proceed in considering the technology's current and potential business applications and associated benefits and outcomes.

Defining the IoT

There are several definitions of the IoT in technical literature and popular media. Our definition encompasses the key elements as follows:

The IoT is a suite of technologies and applications that equip devices and locations to generate all kinds of information—and to connect those devices and locations for instant data analysis and, ideally, “smart” action. Conceptually, the IoT implies physical objects being able to utilise the Internet backbone to communicate data about their condition, position, or other attributes.4

Creating and capturing value

The IoT focuses on the aggregation and use of information from several sources. Information, however, creates value only when it is utilised for modifying future action in beneficial ways. Ideally, this modified action gives rise to new information, allowing the learning process to continue. Information, then, can create value not in a linear value chain of process steps but, rather, in a never-ending process. One way of capturing this process is as an Information Value Cycle (IVC) with discrete but connected stages (figure 1).

For information to complete the cycle and create value, it passes through the cycle’s stages, each enabled by specific technologies.5 It starts with everyday business activities that generate data. This data is captured by sensors (attached to devices), creating information as a result, along an array of dimensions from vibration to humidity to movement, and beyond. Such information is communicated via a network, aggregated, and analysed, leading to insights. These insights—sometimes called “augmented intelligence”—may then either enable automated action or shape human decisions (“augmented behaviour”) in a manner leading to improved, more competitive business operations, thereby completing the cycle.6

Characterising the IoT market structure

When one thinks at a very high level, IoT market segments can be generally divided into three broad categories: enterprise/industrial, consumer, and services/public sector. Each of these segments is marked by distinct characteristics and market opportunities (table 1).

The enterprise/industrial segment involves relatively complex and rich data sets and far fewer devices relative to the consumer segment. The enterprise/industrial segment tends to also be driven by manufacturing operations and product development within a relatively private cloud environment. In contrast, the consumer segment is typically rooted in customer experience and a more public cloud environment. The services/public sector segment is generally something of a hybrid between the other two segments in terms of richness and complexity of data, number of devices, and a bias towards a particular cloud environment, although it tends to bear a closer resemblance to the consumer segment in terms of experience-driven use cases.

The fastest growing IoT segment appears to be enterprise/industrial, projected to capture slightly more than half of global IoT spending by 2020. A particularly strong driver of growth in IoT spending within the enterprise/industrial segment is digital supply network (DSN) applications. While there is a host of DSN use cases that is driving IoT spending within the enterprise/industrial segment, four seem to stand out in particular:

  • Condition-based monitoring/predictive maintenance: Monitoring and continuously evaluating key performance parameters of capital assets and, in the process, leveraging advanced analytics to predict failures before they occur
  • Asset tracking: Tracking location and movement of assets and/or materials using location-based sensors, enabling real-time reporting and optimisation of system performance
  • Dynamic routing and scheduling: Enhancing the productivity of both individual units and broad networks using deep and broad insights derived from aspects such as visibility on conditions and performance in real time
  • Asset and process optimisation: Evaluating and monitoring operational data and ambient conditions of critical assets and processes in real time to optimise performance and safety

Manufacturing is a substantial driver of spending within the enterprise/industrial IoT space as well as overall IoT spending.7 This may be attributed to Industry 4.0 and the ensuing wave of digital transformations that will likely drive significant demand for IoT capabilities across a broad spectrum of services within manufacturing. Other key sectors driving enterprise/industrial IoT include oil & gas, power & utilities, life sciences/health care, and transportation.

Quantifying the IoT market potential

The IoT is a complex ecosystem—there are different approaches to its market sizing. One of the common ways of describing the market is in terms of connected devices. In 2016, the number of IoT-connected devices was estimated at 18 billion units and is expected to grow at approximately 15 per cent CAGR to reach about 31 billion units by 2020.8 Other estimates place the projected number of connected devices at somewhat less than this figure.

Alternatively and without regard to the end-use segment, the IoT market can be characterised in terms of four categories of products―device hardware, systems integration, network connectivity, and platforms/applications/cloud solutions.9 These four categories taken together (which comprise the global IoT market) had an estimated market value of $0.4 trillion in 2015, and is forecasted to expand at approximately 20 per cent CAGR to reach around $1.1 trillion by 2020 (figure 2).10 As mentioned, the enterprise/industrial sector is expected to account for by far the largest share of this global IoT market by 2020 at about 50–60 per cent of total spending.11

We briefly describe the four product categories below:

  • Device hardware: Components used in machines and devices such as sensors and circuits to collect information
  • Systems integration: Hardware and software to integrate different proprietary systems with each other and with open systems in order to increase interoperability
  • Network connectivity: A host of established network technologies (such as Wi-Fi and Bluetooth) and emerging technologies (such as 5G and Low-Power, Wide-Area [LPWA]) for connectivity among different IoT devices12
  • Platforms/applications/cloud solutions: Software solutions to facilitate integration of the other three elements in order to provide a secure user interface and drive on-ground applications; includes data aggregation, visualisation and security; analytics; and action management

Among these four major categories, platforms/applications/cloud solutions account for the largest share (40–45 per cent over the forecast period). However, the fastest growing segment is systems integration, which is expected to grow at 52 per cent CAGR from 2015 to 2020, tripling its share of global IoT spending from 5 per cent to 15 per cent.13

Enabling technologies and industry undercurrents driving the IoT despite some impediments

The growth of the IoT over the last few years can be attributed to a number of beneficial factors, some of which are discussed below:

  • Bandwidth, data storage and computing prices declining: Costs associated with transferring, storing, and analysing data have declined precipitously over the last two decades (figure 3).14
  • Growing analytics applications driving the use of augmented intelligence: IoT applications are increasingly driven by both decreasing storage costs (figure 3) and volumes of big data (figures 4)—coupled with growth in advanced analytics tools, proprietary as well as open-source, such as the R package (figure 5). We are witnessing applications of augmented intelligence for not just analysing past business performance but also making predictions about customer demand, supply chain optimisation, machine performance, etc.15
  • Expanding use of augmented behaviour from simple automation to complex decision-making: Improved functionality at lower prices (figure 6) is driving higher penetration of industrial robots (figure 7). For situations where a user needs to take the action, machines are increasingly being developed with basic behavioural science principles in mind, allowing them to influence human behaviours in positive and effective ways.16
  • Sector-specific undercurrents also driving demand: Beyond industry-agnostic technical drivers of the IoT reside sector-specific demand conditions. In manufacturing, for example, a broad digital transformation seems to be taking place under the banner of Industry 4.0 that undergirds the deployment of advanced analytics IoT capabilities. Within the power and utilities sector, a desire to “reach beyond the meter” in optimising network performance, among other factors, appears to be driving IoT investments. The call for integrated smart city initiatives is likely driving public sector IoT spending. The explosion of health-related data and unyielding demand for health care delivery options “anytime, anywhere” seem to be driving IoT solutions within life sciences and health care. Other examples of sector-specific IoT demand drivers abound.

While we discussed above some key factors that seem to be driving the growth of the IoT, we should be mindful of some of the issues hindering IoT applications, and their corresponding potential solutions. Table 2 offers a set of some of the technical challenges that confront continued IoT development.

Beyond the scope of these technical challenges seem to reside some very real challenges of cultural resistance to the adoption of the smart solutions that IoT offers. Some of this resistance stems from the workforce itself, perhaps slow in accepting a “new way of doing things.” Some of this resistance seems to also stem from a reluctance on the part of organisations that don’t yet understand or are otherwise unable to articulate the IoT value proposition. And, still others believe in the IoT value proposition, but misapply it in ways that merely pursue connectivity for its own sake, without a real plan to address real business problems. We will speak more on this shortly.

Exploring a range of IoT applications

The IoT is transforming business models, given its applicability for a wide range of applications in different industries and geographies. A sampling of the current and emerging IoT-related applications is described in table 3 by industry.

Key considerations for organisations

The IoT is emerging as an important digital transformation technology irrespective of the industry, business function, or geography. Costs associated with data collection, transfer, processing, storage, and computing have together come down to a point where they can drive significant mainstream IoT applications. With fast-evolving and expanding applications, the IoT seems to be shaping into an increasingly complex ecosystem that offers opportunities of value creation and capture for different stakeholders, including individuals, societies, companies, consortia, and governments. As such, the IoT is increasingly influencing the way we run businesses and live our lives. Additionally, the IoT is also expected to drive and support a number of related yet different technologies such as augmented/virtual reality, automation, and robotics.

All of this said, however, organisations should bear in mind that “connectivity” in and of itself is not a strategy that necessarily provides real business value. Unfortunately, many IoT initiatives end up being “shiny” solutions in search of a problem, concepts that have popular appeal but don’t deliver real-world value. And organisations should be focussing on IoT initiatives that create real business value―not just connecting stuff for the sake of connecting stuff.

Indeed, the real power of the IoT likely resides in harnessing its incredible potential in solving real problems and, in so doing, creating real business value. From asset monitoring and predictive maintenance to fleet management and logistics to smart supply chains to smart mobility and well beyond, the IoT—when used strategically—can help solve some of the most nettlesome challenges that organisations of all kinds face today. As IoT applications are evolving with each passing day, companies may wish to think through their current and future strategic positioning and build product and service offerings accordingly.

And towards that end, companies can adopt a commonsense approach in implementing IoT solutions successfully. First, companies should think big. Push the envelope in developing an ambitious and forward-looking IoT vision that cuts across organisational silos. Second, companies should actually start small. Target the most promising opportunity areas, launch small and swiftly, and go for the rapid wins. Third, companies should scale fast. Once an IoT initiative is proven successful, companies should scale up quickly to maximise benefits. Finally, companies should consider turnkey solutions that may help to jump-start the process—solutions that are geared towards a particular industry or business application in line with the organisation’s objectives.

There is no magic formula when it comes to successful IoT implementation. But companies that know what they want to achieve in relying on the IoT—and approach it with a vision that is grounded in real-world issues—may very well have a leg up in achieving strategic objectives.

Final thoughts

The next few years will likely be marked with increasing applications of the IoT in different industries. In developing this primer, our objective was to help organisations review the market potential and assess current and potential applications, think through different opportunities for value creation and capture, and address key challenges to adoption. Additionally, as the IoT supports different technologies such as robotics, augmented reality, and automation, this primer should serve as reference material for several other technologies that we will discuss in individual primers.

For more information, including IoT-related industry perspective and use cases, please refer to the Internet of Things collections page on Deloitte Insights.

Andy Daecher leads Deloitte Digital’s IoT practice and is based in San Francisco, California. He can be reached at adaecher@deloitte.com.

Mark Cotteleer is the director of Deloitte's Center for Integrated Research and is based in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. He can be contacted at mcotteleer@deloitte.com.

Jonathan Holdowsky is a senior manager with Deloitte’s Center for Integrated Research and is based in Boston, Massachusetts. He can be reached at jholdowsky@deloitte.com.

This paper would not have been possible without the diligent contributions of Monika Mahto and Hemnabh Varia of Deloitte Services India Pvt. Ltd.  This paper also benefitted from the support of Andy Daecher of Deloitte Consulting LLP, as well as Joe MarianiGeri GibbonsJennie Chang, and Janet Chang of Deloitte Services LP.  Jonathan Holdowsky of Deloitte Services LP provided overall support and editorial guidance in the development of this paper.

 Cover image by: Mengxin Li

  1. Michael E. Raynor and Mark Cotteleer, The more things change: Value creation, value capture, and the Internet of Things, Deloitte University Press, July 27, 2015.

    View in Article
  2. Jim Eckenrode, The derivative effect: How financial services can make IoT technology pay offThe Internet of Things in the financial services industry, Deloitte University Press, October 13, 2015.

    View in Article
  3. Deloitte analysis; Airbus, “Airbus moves forward with its “factory of the future” concept,” accessed October 12, 2017; IoT Agenda, “ How IoT will change auto insurance,” accessed October 17, 2017; Andrew Meola, “Automotive industry trends: IoT connected smart cars & vehicles,” Business Insider, December 20, 2016; other analyst reports.

    View in Article
  4. Surabhi Kejriwal and Saurabh Mahajan, Smart buildings: How IoT technology aims to add value for real estate companies, Deloitte University Press, April 19, 2016.

    View in Article
  5. The elements of each stage of the IVC in figure 1 are presented for illustrative purposes.

    View in Article
  6. Ibid. 

    View in Article
  7. Jenny Lai, Anderson Chow, Carrie Liu, and Chi Tsang, The industrial Internet of Things, HSBC Global Research, November 2016, p. 14.

    View in Article
  8. Statista, “Internet of Things (IoT) connected devices installed base worldwide from 2015 to 2025 (in billions),” accessed November 1, 2017. 

    View in Article
  9. Lai, Chow, Liu, and Tsang, The industrial Internet of Things, p. 14.

    View in Article
  10. Ibid, p. 8 and p. 13.

    View in Article
  11. Ibid, p. 14.

    View in Article
  12. For more information on network technologies, please see the IoT primer on Deloitte Insights.

    View in Article
  13. Lai, Chow, Liu, and Tsang, The industrial Internet of Things, p. 8 and p. 13.

    View in Article
  14. Raynor and Cotteleer, The more things change; John Greenough, “The Internet of everything: 2015 [slide deck]” Business Insider, December 30, 2014.

    View in Article
  15. Jonathan Holdowsky, Monika Mahto, Michael E. Raynor, and Mark Cotteleer, Inside the Internet of Things (IoT), Deloitte University Press, August 21, 2015.

    View in Article
  16. Ibid. 

    View in Article
  17. Constrained Application Protocol (CoAP) is an open-source protocol that transfers data packets in a format that is lighter than that of other protocols such as Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP), a protocol familiar to many, as it appears in most web addresses. While CoAP is well suited for energy-constrained sensor systems, it does not come with in-built security features, and additional protocols are needed to secure intercommunications between sensor systems.

    View in Article
  18. Holdowsky, Mahto, Raynor, and Cotteleer, Inside the Internet of Things (IoT).

    View in Article
  19. Power-aware routing protocols determine the routing decision based on the most energy-efficient route for transmitting data packets; sleep-scheduling protocols define how devices can “sleep” and remain inactive for better energy efficiency without impacting the output.

    View in Article
  20. Mikael Hagstroem, "Big data analytics for inclusive growth: How technology can help elevate the human condition," World Economic Forum, accessed October 26, 2017.

    View in Article
  21. Ben Woo, “Combating the big data skills shortage,” Forbes, January 18, 2013. 

    View in Article
  22. Wayne Eckerson, Big data analytics: Profiling the use of analytical platforms in user organizations, Beye Network, 2011.

    View in Article
  23. Vincenzo Sinibaldi, “Airport 3:0: How smart technologies are transforming air travel,” City Metric, May 4, 2016.

    View in Article
  24. Freddie Roberts, “Honeywell’s IoT connected aircraft takes flight,” Internet of Business, June 19, 2017.

    View in Article
  25. LeAnne Graves, “Selfies help travelers clear immigration at Dubai International as border control goes biometric,” National, June 27, 2017.

    View in Article
  26. IoT Agenda, “How IoT will change auto insurance,” accessed October 17, 2017.

    View in Article
  27. Visa, “Visa and IBM collaborate to bring payments to the Internet of Things,” accessed October 12, 2017.

    View in Article
  28. Nicholas Fearn, “US Air Force mulls IoT deployment,” March 29, 2016. 

    View in Article
  29. Rice University News & Media, “Rice and IBM explore Watson-powered robot designed to aid elderly and caregivers,” December 8, 2016.

    View in Article
  30. Romain Dillet, “Augmedics is building augmented reality glasses for spinal surgery,” Tech Crunch, September 19, 2017. 

    View in Article
  31. Meola, “Automotive industry trends.” 

    View in Article
  32. Laurie Winkless, “Reading the road: How will driverless cars talk to pedestrians?,” Forbes, January 4, 2017.

    View in Article
  33. Hyundai, “How will the Internet of Things transform the car industry?,” March 28, 2017.

    View in Article

Did you find this useful?

Thanks for your feedback

If you would like to help improve Deloitte.com further, please complete a 3-minute survey