TEN years ago, Richard Thaler and Cass Sunstein’s book Nudge introduced the powerful concept of choice architecture: the idea that subtle tweaks to choice environments can significantly impact our decisions. By designing choice environments in ways that work in harmony with human psychology, we can prompt better decisions—decisions that individuals would make if they had unbounded cognitive abilities and no self-control problems.
Behavioural science, or “nudge thinking,” is the use of choice architecture and other techniques to try to influence the choices people make. Academic research has provided powerful theories about human decision-making and these theories have shown impact in real-world settings across the globe. It turns out that human beings are often busy, distracted and socially motivated. As a result, our “decisions” are often the result of subconscious, nonrational influences. If the default option for our 401(k) is to invest, we are more likely to save for retirement. If we know our neighbours are recycling, we are more likely to recycle. And if the financial aid form is prepopulated with the family’s income data, the student is more likely to attend college.
Though private companies are increasingly taking notice, government agencies have been in the vanguard of this movement, testing nudge theories in hundreds of real-life settings around the world.
In 2010, the United Kingdom’s Behavioural Insights Team became the first governmental “nudge unit” to study and harness behavioural patterns for more informed policymaking and improved government services.1 Since then, there has been a proliferation of formal and informal nudge groups within government agencies, as hundreds of countries, states and cities have applied the concepts of nudge thinking to improve outcomes.2
Broad use cases across government. In recent years, nudges have gone from being a novelty to a commonly used tool in the public sector, thanks to the presence of hundreds of government nudge units and their impressive track record of beneficial results. Nudges have increased tax compliance in the UK 3 and the US, 4 and reduced littering in Scotland. 5 Nudges have encouraged citizens to save more for their retirement in Oregon, 6 more businesses to comply with regulations in Ontario, Canada, 7 and pedestrians to stop jaywalking in Bogota, Colombia. 8
In public health, in order to reduce antibiotic over-prescribing, the Australian Department of Health's Behavioural Economics and Research Team (BERT) identified general practitioners with high antibiotic prescribing patterns and sent them letters that compared their prescribing patterns with those of other doctors. This intervention, based on a behavioural concept called “social proof”, proved successful: BERT was able to reduce the number of antibiotic prescriptions by more than 125,000 over a six-month full stop. 9
Partnerships. Another way many governments are using behavioural insights to develop effective policies is to partner with academia, charities and multilateral organisations. For instance, the World Bank's Mind, Behaviour and Development Unit works closely with local governments worldwide on some of the biggest economic and social problems by evaluating behavioural patterns and designing appropriate interventions. 10 In Tanzania, the World Bank, in partnership with a local mobile service provider, developed behaviourally informed text messages to encourage low-income individuals to save more; the highest savings achieved here was more than 11 per cent. 11
Next-generation nudges. Some governments have also begun transitioning to the next generation of nudges, which increasingly embed design thinking, data and predictive analytics into government programmes. Predictive models based on big data can be used to flag the issues most in need of attention, while behavioural insights can provide the tools to prompt the desired behaviour change. 12 Small, often inexpensive changes can yield outsized results. By leveraging big data and machine learning, government agencies can create prescriptive nudges, customised to provide the right nudge to the right person at the right time, thereby maximising impact. Analogous to precision medicine, the “3D” trifecta of data, digital and design can ultimately enable what might be called “precision engagement.” 13
New Mexico's Department of Workforce Solutions has applied these tools to tackle a thorny problem: claimants improperly collecting unemployment insurance benefits due to inaccurate disclosure of earnings and other information. 14 Officials recognised that most improper claims were minor, rather than serious, scams. So, rather than taking the traditional (and expensive) approach of criminal enforcement, they used low-cost “fizzy drink-ups” and other nudges—customised using machine learning—to prompt more accurate disclosure. 15 In the year after the smarter system went live, improper payments fell by half and unrecovered overpayments have shrunk by almost 75 per cent, saving the state almost US$7 million annually. 16
While the application of behavioural insights has succeeded in accomplishing a variety of effective policy outcomes, there are certain risks associated with the approach. In some cases, government nudges may come off as overly paternalistic, or worse, manipulative. Richard Thaler says that whenever he autographs a copy of Nudge, he writes, “Nudge for good!” Good nudges can help individuals overcome natural human limitations to make better choices. In contrast, choice architecture can also be used in ways that manipulate or exploit our human limitations. (Some commercial nudges—“buy now, pay later!”—autumn into this category.) Furthermore, poorly designed nudges may produce counterproductive results or unintended consequences—making thoughtful design and a commitment to testing and learning critical. Despite these concerns, nudge thinking has shown its effectiveness and should be considered for any policy that involves human behaviour.
Read more on how governments are applying behavioural science for better policymaking in the Behavioural economics and public policy collection.
Faced with shrinking budgets, increasing mission demands and limited tolerance for risk on the part of citizens and stakeholders, government leaders require new thinking, tools and approaches to tackle the wicked problems they face. At Deloitte Consulting LLP, we have developed a suite of innovation services tailored to the needs of public sector organisations. Our innovation services help governments and public sector leaders develop innovation strategies; design, launch and scale innovations; and build their internal innovation capabilities to generate and implement more, better, higher-impact solutions to improve the way government serves its citizens.