Skip to main content
David Ciampa
Jeff Loucks

And with a limited number of established companies available, M&A deal premiums have risen—bringing into question how companies should approach M&A going forward. The skyrocketing cost of M&A deals is especially critical due to the flurry of new direct-to-consumer streaming options and companies’ need to fill those services with often-expensive proprietary content.

According to Deloitte’s latest Digital media trends survey, consumers can now choose from more than 300 streaming options,2 with more on the way in 2020.3 No surprise that many consumers are feeling “subscription fatigue,” potentially limiting the number of streaming providers likely to survive and win in this space. These highly competitive dynamics, fueled by new entrants such as technology leaders Amazon and Apple, are intensifying the race to build the biggest and best streaming options to compete with Netflix’s first-mover advantage.

Since 2014, US companies in the TME sector have executed more than US$500 billion4 of M&A deals,5 highlighted by landmark transactions such as Walt Disney’s acquisition of 21st Century Fox’s entertainment assets, and by AT&T’s acquisition of Time Warner, including HBO and Turner assets. While this consolidation wave has been seen across the industry, these two transactions alone accounted for almost a third of the sector’s total deal value over the past five years.

This surging takeover activity has contributed to control premiums (the amount the acquirer must pay above the pre-bid value of the acquisition target to take control) from an annual level of 27 percent in 2014 to as high as 57 percent in 2017 (see figure 1).6

M&A premium trends in the US TME sector, according to Deloitte analysis:

  • 2014 to 2016 average takeover premium: 38 percent
  • 2017 to 2019 average takeover premium: 55 percent

This trend has materialized outside the United States as well, albeit less dramatically. Since 2014, around US$250 billion7 of M&A deals (including a US$500 million-plus transaction value) have been executed in the non-US TME sector. However, the takeover premiums have generally been lower elsewhere in the world.

M&A premium trends in the non-US TME sector:

  • 2014 to 2016 average takeover premium: 12 percent
  • 2017 to 2019 average takeover premium: 15 percent

What does this mean for buyers and sellers?

Clearly, the surge in consolidation across the TME industry can drive higher valuations, and this naturally favors sellers. In addition, after some major mergers, fewer target assets are available, further boosting valuations. And the lower frequency of deals in recent years signals that there could be less-viable targets remaining. Further, some targets may have convoluted ownership structures that could discourage potential suitors.

But there could be some good news for buyers: Some diversified TME players may be weighing opportunistic divestitures to meet the supply shortfall. Buyers, though, should act cautiously. Iain Bamford, Deloitte’s TME sector lead, sums up: “Buyers should be focused on understanding their unique market positioning to develop short- and long-term content strategy prior to jumping into costly M&A activity.”

Given the steady rise of M&A deal premiums, TME companies need to be focused on finding the right targets that will bolster their existing content strategies to gain the most value from M&A activity.

Did you find this useful?

Thanks for your feedback

If you would like to help improve further, please complete a 3-minute survey