This site uses cookies to provide you with a more responsive and personalized service. By using this site you agree to our use of cookies. Please read our cookie notice for more information on the cookies we use and how to delete or block them.

Bookmark Email Print this page

IRS Insights - July 2014


Deloitte ImageWelcome to the bimonthly publication, IRS Insights, produced by the Deloitte Tax Controversy Services group to keep our clients abreast of current issues related to the Internal Revenue Service.

In this month's issue:

  • District Court Concludes that Attorney-Client/Tax Practitioner Privileges and Work Product Doctrine Did Not Protect Tax Memorandum from Disclosure in Summons Enforcement Case
    - The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York considered whether the attorney-client/tax practitioner privileges or the work product doctrine applied so as to protect from disclosure a memorandum prepared by Ernst & Young, along with other related documents. The Court denied Petitioner’s petition to quash the summons, concluding that the documents at issue were not protected from disclosure under either the attorney-client/tax practitioner privilege or the work product doctrine.
  • Third Circuit Concludes that a Taxpayer May Be Able to Establish Reasonable Cause for Missing Tax Payment Deadline Due to Reliance on an Advisor
    - The Third Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed a Pennsylvania district court’s decision denying the estate’s refund claim for the amount of a late-payment penalty that it was assessed and paid. The Third Circuit vacated the district court’s decision, which granted summary judgment to the United States, and remanded the case, concluding that there was a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether the taxpayer reasonably relied on an advisor in good faith. Distinguishing the facts of the instant case from the situation presented in United States v. Boyle, 469 U.S. 241 (1985), the appellate court held that a taxpayer’s reliance on the advice of a tax expert may be reasonable cause for a taxpayer’s failure to pay by the deadline.
  • Supreme Court Requires Taxpayers to Offer Specific Facts Plausibly Raising an Inference of Bad Faith to Conduct an Examination of IRS Motives for Issuing Summons
    - The U.S. Supreme Court determined that a taxpayer has the right to conduct an examination of Internal Revenue Service officials regarding their reasons for issuing a summons when the taxpayer points to specific facts or circumstances plausibly raising an inference of bad faith.
  • IRS Adopts Taxpayer Bill of Rights
    - The Internal Revenue Service formally adopted a Taxpayer Bill of Rights, advanced by the National Taxpayer Advocate, to make taxpayers’ existing rights more clear, more understandable, and more quickly available to taxpayers.

See attached file for details.

Visit the IRS Insights archive for issues from the past year.

Deloitte Image Subscribe to IRS Insights

Share this page

Email this Send to LinkedIn Send to Facebook Tweet this More sharing options

Stay connected