This site uses cookies to provide you with a more responsive and personalized service. By using this site you agree to our use of cookies. Please read our cookie notice for more information on the cookies we use and how to delete or block them.
This series examines today’s most pressing business issues from many angles. The Debates offer a healthy discussion of options, immediate impacts and long-term consequences. The following Debates address some of your supply chain-related concerns.
There is no question that financial institutions will face a broad range of new data requirements as a result of the Dodd-Frank law. One question is what to do about it.
Increased regulation, stakeholder activism and changing consumer behaviors have made companies realize that sustainability is more than just a public relations issue. But when it comes to M&A, is sustainability really a critical deal issue?
Talent strategies are designed to attract, motivate, and retain employees. In the current economy, what compensation and talent strategies are the most effective for financial services companies?
Program Management Offices (PMOs) are traditionally responsible for improvements in management of IT programs. However, as more value is needed from IT, is the PMO able to shoulder the burden of complex projects, or is something more needed?
For life sciences companies, is it better to start investing now to help develop EHR standards and capitalize on the potential benefits? Or wait and then follow the crowd?
M&A can be risky. Therefore, it’s important to make informed decisions about managing risk. Some companies choose an integrated approach; others limit the responsibility to a specialized deal group. Which approach works better?
What role should a government sponsored health plan play in achieving health reform goals, and would it result in fewer choices or suboptimal care? Learn about both sides of the Debate.
Having trouble finding the right balance between products and services? Take a look at the major issues companies are wrestling with and some practical thoughts on ways to tackle the problem.
Traditionally, organizational transformations are closely watched to prevent them from boiling over. Another approach is to run them like a start-up. So, do you keep the transformation close? Or give it some breathing room?