This site uses cookies to provide you with a more responsive and personalized service. By using this site you agree to our use of cookies. Please read our cookie notice for more information on the cookies we use and how to delete or block them.

Bookmark Email Print this page

Battle for Dominance in the M&A Advisory Business

Bulge-brackets vs. the boutiques


Wall Street, like Washington and football coaches, seems to have a special fondness for battle metaphors. Executives read “The Art of War,” headlines speak of “corporate raiders,” and the language of combat and victory pervades analysis of competitive trends.

Amid the noise and war whoops, it is possible that the true battles for industry dominance are being waged with little fanfare. One such battle is the ongoing contest between bulge-bracket investment banks and boutiques, played out on the fields of the mergers and acquisitions (M&A) advisory business. Boutiques have been a major competitive force since at least the 1990s and in recent years have further boosted both their share of the business and marketplace prominence. Still, a number of questions remain. How significant are boutiques’ gains? How have different factors driven boutiques’ achievements? Are these drivers sustainable and how severe is the threat to bulge-brackets?

This paper looks at the evolution of the competitive landscape in M&A advisory and examines the drivers of change. It also provides insights into the future of the competitive landscape and considerations for both boutiques and bulge-bracket banks.

View the paper and infographic to learn more.

As used in this document, “Deloitte” means Deloitte LLP [and its subsidiaries]. Please see for a detailed description of the legal structure of Deloitte LLP and its subsidiaries. Certain services may not be available to attest clients under the rules and regulations of public accounting.

Share this page

Email this Send to LinkedIn Send to Facebook Tweet this More sharing options

Stay connected