This site uses cookies to provide you with a more responsive and personalised service. By using this site you agree to our use of cookies. Please read our cookie notice for more information on the cookies we use and how to delete or block them.

Bookmark Email Print page

Barriers to entry: international networks

Deloitte’s response to the Competition Commission's working paper

Deloitte’s response to the Competition Commission's international networks paper

Background

Deloitte’s response comments on the following areas:

  • The reasons for developing an international network
  • Views on the possible effect of a network on competition

Some of these issues are also covered in Deloitte’s responses to other working papers, namely a) Framework for the CC’s assessment and revised theories of harm, and b) Restrictions on entry and expansion.

Key Findings

Deloitte’s view, which is backed up by the experiences and evidence of the mid tier firms, is that the major mid tier firms all belong to large, established and growing international networks.  No firm has submitted to the CC that investment in its international network is a barrier to its growth with respect to FTSE 350 audits.  It is incorrect to conclude, therefore, that international networks are a barrier to entry that prevent mid tier firms from competing against top tier firms for a significant proportion of FTSE 350 audits.

Download

Download Deloitte’s response to the Competition Commission's international networks paper (PDF)

Share this page

Email this Send to LinkedIn Send to Facebook Tweet this More sharing options
Follow:

Get in touch

More on Deloitte