This site uses cookies to provide you with a more responsive and personalised service. By using this site you agree to our use of cookies. Please read our cookie notice for more information on the cookies we use and how to delete or block them.

Bookmark Email Print page

Deloitte’s response to the ‘Initial review of relevant academic literature’

May 2012

Deloitte’s response to the ‘Initial review of relevant academic literature’

Background

Professor Vivien Beattie of Glasgow University prepared a review of academic literature for the Competition Commission (CC), published in April 2012. The Literature Review sought to present an overview of research in a number of areas, including audit quality, non-audit services, tendering, etc; and focuses on the more recent research.

Contents

In this paper, Deloitte sets out comments on a number of the key issues raised in the Literature Review, and concludes that the most up to date, empirical literature relating to the UK is broadly supportive of the perspective that Deloitte has set out to the CC. The Literature Review acknowledges:

  • The multi-dimensional nature of audit quality
  • That high concentration in a market does not necessarily imply the existence of market power/lack of competition
  • That when audit firms compete on price and quality, high levels of concentration do not indicate a lack of competition

Download

Download Deloitte’s response to the ‘Initial review of relevant academic literature’ (PDF)

Share this page

Email this Send to LinkedIn Send to Facebook Tweet this More sharing options
Follow:

Get in touch

More on Deloitte