This site uses cookies to provide you with a more responsive and personalised service. By using this site you agree to our use of cookies. Please read our cookie notice for more information on the cookies we use and how to delete or block them.

Bookmark Email Print page

Characteristics of long audit tenure companies

Deloitte’s response to the Competition Commission's working paper

Deloitte’s response to the Competition Commission’s characteristics of long audit tenure companies paper

Background

Deloitte has already addressed some of these issues in its response to the CC's Evidence on switching costs and its response to the CC’s Nature and strength of competition in the supply of FTSE 350 audits working papers.

Deloitte’s response also comments on the following areas:

  • Client size
  • Client retention and value for money
  • Switching events

Key Findings

Companies that have long engagements with their existing auditor are not in a fundamentally different position from companies which switch auditors more frequently. The fact that they may tend to be larger or more complex companies has been shown by the evidence before the CC to have no bearing on the competitiveness of the audit services those companies receive.

Companies that receive high quality services and good value for money have no reason to switch their auditor. On the other hand, companies that are not satisfied with their auditor do tender and switch auditor.

Download

Download Deloitte’s response to the Competition Commission’s characteristics of long audit tenure companies paper (PDF)

 

 

 

Share this page

Email this Send to LinkedIn Send to Facebook Tweet this More sharing options
Follow:

Get in touch

More on Deloitte