Today, Hungarian courts hearing public administration cases and the European Court of Justice both play an increasingly important role in establishing legal practice in the field of tax controversies. The appropriate mapping of potential legal remedies is ever more important if taxpayers want to take an effective stand against authority resolutions in contested matters.
Deloitte Hungary conducted a survey among Hungarian medium and large companies regarding legal remedy proceedings launched in tax issues to obtain a clear view of Hungarian legal practice and potential unexploited opportunities.
Main topics of the survey:
In spite of the positive tendencies in the expertise of courts, companies do not yet trust that court resolutions will go against authority positions. Our experience, however, shows that such fears are unjustified: contested authority resolutions may efficiently be challenged based on well structured and represented legal arguments. Other concerns are the length of procedures, the required resources and additional costs, which can be greatly reduced e.g. through a success fee arrangement or by engaging an expert who learned about the case already during the administrative phase. Taxpayers are typically not aware of the detailed rules (especially regarding court procedures) even though these are essential. If, however, one disposes of the appropriate technical knowledge and experience, challenging unlawful authority resolutions before the court should be considered; further, authority resolutions should also be reviewed in light of the provisions of EU law.
|Deloitte Legal in Central Europe
With a network of member firms in 11 countries, 19 offices with more than 150 highly qualified, experienced and specialized lawyers, Deloitte Legal is capable to answer several complex international and national legal issues.
|Litigation & dispute resolution
Szarvas, Falcsik and Partners Law Firm - Correspondent law firm of Deloitte Hungary